This year's netizens have reached a new level in choosing words and sentences: The Golden Rooster Awards were presented a few days ago. Post-2000 actor Li Gengxi defeated Ma Li, Zhang Zifeng and others to win the Best Actress award with "Let's Shake the Sun Together". N

This year’s netizens have reached a new level in choosing words and sentences: the Golden Rooster Awards were presented a few days ago.

Not only did someone shout "shady" at the scene, but afterward, netizens also named her:

The prefabricated movie queen.

It can be said that this is probably the most fiercely questioned Golden Rooster Award for Best Actress in so many years.

Is it Li Gengxi who is not qualified?

Perhaps behind everyone’s doubts about Li Gengxi, it is more dissatisfaction with the current domestic entertainment. Li Gengxi's award has completely put an end to this dissatisfaction.

1

Let me talk about the conclusion first:

Li Gengxi is a relatively good one among the new generation of young actors. But she is still far from being a movie queen. How do you say

?

In fact, Li Gengxi's performance in "Let's Shake the Sun Together" is not bad.

A clip:

A uremic patient waited for a kidney, but her hopes were disappointed. How did she behave?

took just a few seconds, and went from nervousness to disappointment, to letting go of the psychological burden and letting out a sigh of relief, pretending to be indifferent. Her expressions and body movements quickly convey all of the character's emotions. Even if it's not stunning, it's still very touching.

In this film, because the creator focuses on tear-jerking, empathy, and touching people, he often amplifies the actors' performances, making such scenes common.

Lee Gengxi not only meets the audience's expectations for the character Ling Min, but also makes us feel the pain of externalization.

But can such a performance win the Best Actress?

certainly not.

As we all know, in most (without moisture) selections, whether a person can win the performance award depends on two factors.

either has qualifications: he has a large number of successful performance endorsements in previous works, making this award a natural progression. Just like Carina Lau who won the gold medal ("Detective Detective").

Or Tony Leung won the Best Actor Award ("Goldfinger").

even have the same doubts.

But in front of the actor's amazing resume, everyone can only make fun of him.

And what about the second factor?

is amazing enough: just like Wen Qi . In 2017, she starred in "Carnival" and "Blood Guanyin", one was nominated for the Golden Horse Best Actress, and the other won the Golden Horse Best Supporting Actress.

Why?

Take a detail in "Blood Guanyin" as an example. When she was teased, her reaction was that the muscles on her face twitched slightly and her eyes darted left and right.

In the few seconds of the scene, several expressions are extremely difficult to control, which is really wonderful.

So that year, even though she was only 14 years old, even though she had not acted in a few movies, because the temperament she showed in the movies was much higher than her age, there was almost no doubt about giving her this award. .

and Li Gengxi have neither.

is correct. She does have malleable qualities. Such as nature.

Just like in "Rabbit Violence", facing the mother who has been missing since childhood, how does she face the time spent with her mother?

play like friends. Sitting in her mother's car and playfully sticking her head out of the window, there is no need for a painful "reunion" drama, the emotions are revealed completely naturally and easily. (And this action was Li Gengxi’s improvisation)

or stubborn. As shown in a large number of works such as "The Long Season", Li Gengxi's face always reveals stubbornness in his simplicity, which is currently lacking in many young actors in China.

But obviously, on the one hand, her appearance has not fully reached the mature level, and on the other hand, the scripts she gets often have explicit requirements for the emotional expression of the characters.

This means that these characteristics of Li Gengxi are only on the surface.Under such circumstances,

rashly gave her the title of "Best of the Year" just because of a good work and a passable performance.

If you want to convince netizens, then you are in trouble.

2

But the question is, are netizens’ doubts really just directed at Li Gengxi himself? Neither does

.

sir feels that behind the overwhelming ridicule of is actually dissatisfaction with "a certain path to success".

Think about it, the word actor has long been demonized. If this actor uses an abnormal channel, such as capital support, to squeeze out other people's resources and rise at a rocket-like speed, wouldn't it be even more disappointing?

netizens’ doubts are actually reasonable.

Take the entry for "pre-made dish movie queen" as an example. Why is it called "pre-made dish"?

is actually an industrial copy of .

For example, if "Little Farewell" became popular, she would film a similar "Little Joy".

For example, after "The Hidden Corner" became popular, she filmed Xin Shuang's next film "The Long Season".

For example, after "Send You a Little Red Flower" became popular, she filmed Han Yan's "Let's Shake the Sun Together".

There are completely rules to follow.

It’s hard not to think of her in the circle, such as Xu Jinglei, Ni Ping and others’ personal connections.

and even more outrageous. The major awards in recent years seem to be catering to this trend.

They have made people suspicious from the shortlisting stage, making the audience feel that they are "creating conditions for winning".

For example, this year's Hundred Flowers Award for Best Actor Zhu Yilong .

is on this nomination list (the other finalists are Andy Lau, Yi Yang Qianxi, Wang Junkai, Zhang Yixing), it seems that there is no big problem for Zhu Yilong to win the award. But it is hard to understand why Zhang Yi, Shen Teng, Huang Bo and others are not even qualified to be shortlisted.

or this Golden Rooster Award.

Yes, just looking at the shortlist of Best Actress, Li Gengxi doesn’t seem to have much problem winning the award. But last year's good actresses, such as Zhou Xun in "Crossing the Angry Sea" or Jiang Qinqin in "The World of Grass and Trees", why are they not even qualified to be shortlisted?

Under this crazy "star-making" method and the selection method full of loopholes.

People then thought: We working hard here are working hard to increase your popularity, but you second-generation people enjoy all the conveniences and even stop pretending to be eager for quick success and instant gain. How can you bear it?

And just at this moment, there is another positive case that can be used as a comparison.

The Best Supporting Actor at this year's Golden Rooster Awards, Wang Xiao.

A familiar face that often appears in film and television works in recent years.

He is also a veritable "second generation". But because he has followed a very "steady" path, everyone is familiar with him from his solid small roles and recognizes that every role he plays is very accurate. When he wins the award, it will be a matter of course.

This further highlights Li Gengxi’s “unmatchedness”.

So in the final analysis. Perhaps what people are dissatisfied with is not Li Gengxi himself. What people are dissatisfied with is actually the word "resource cafe".

is the entertainment in this mess.

Even becoming a "prepared dish" requires a strong background of absurdity.

3

Then again: if there are pre-prepared dishes, of course there must be traditional hand-made fine dishes.

The question is, is the latter really still available?

Remember what sir said before: Li Gengxi is a relatively good actress among the post-00s generation.

This is not a compliment to Li Gengxi.

but disappointment in the present.How do you say

?

Take Li Gengxi’s generation as an example. There are many actresses who debut every year, but how many of them can really make it? Sir can only think of Zhang Zifeng , Liu Haocun and Wen Qi. Among them, Zhang Zifeng was born as a child actor. His smile in "Detective Chinatown" stunned everyone, but nowadays, he is often questioned about his acting skills. Not to mention Liu Haocun, she faces more doubts than Li Gengxi.

And what about Wen Qi?

seems to be representative in terms of acting skills, right? But at this year's Weibo Movie Night party, she also "joked" that she is very free now. (No drama to film)

Why is this happening?

sir believes that it is related to the internal entertainment environment. For example, in the current entertainment industry, what can a new actor rely on to become famous?

is not a movie, but an ancient puppet.

According to incomplete statistics, young actors who now occupy a certain say in the entertainment industry, such as Yu Shuxin, Zhao Lusi, etc., all became famous through ancient puppets.

This way of becoming famous is obviously much simpler than starring in Zhang Yimou's movies.

But as a certain ancient puppet actor said: Ancient puppets do not require acting skills.

So in such an environment, new actors who enter the entertainment industry have a big question: how many opportunities do they have to practice their acting skills and how many opportunities do they have to face up to their own shortcomings?

What about famous actors? Some people prefer to "stay put": Zhang Ailing said, "You must become famous as early as possible."

But they have prematurely entered the mode of mainstream stars, participating in traffic dramas, hit dramas, and participating in variety shows. On these occasions, they You only need to condense your own characteristics into a fixed set of performance methods and build your own "comfort zone."

also lost the motivation to go further.

On the other hand, those who don’t want to stay in their comfort zone are struggling:

sir will not repeat Wen Qi’s example.

From another actress, we can see the absurdity here even more. That is Zhou Dongyu.

In Sir's opinion, Zhou Dongyu is a rare actor in domestic entertainment. Even though he is already famous, he did not follow the mainstream trend of domestic entertainment, but chose to challenge difficult roles as an actor.

Among the several works she has performed in recent years, such as "Parrot Killing", "Morning Clouds and Mud Rain", "Burning Winter", etc., they all have a bad reputation.

But look at her performance. It is obvious that what she is doing is trying to put aside the past. What is the result of

? Whether in terms of popularity or reputation, she is being questioned by the public.

Even worse, many people directly concluded based on its low popularity: Zhou Dongyu can no longer act.

emm......

In such an environment, how many really good young actors can we produce? Of course

sir is not denying Li Gengxi.

But what I have to admit is:

If everyone follows the rules of this game, they hope to stand out in this battle of "prepared dishes".

So what we end up seeing.

I am afraid that there will only be a steady stream of "Lee Gengxi".

Speaking of this, sir remembered a famous line from "The King of Comedy".

Yin Tianqiu is a sidekick. Because I wanted to carefully figure out the character's personality and mentality, I always "couldn't die".

At this time, the big star got angry:

Do you know how many seconds, how many frames of film, how much money were wasted because you didn’t want to die?

and how much staff’s time and effort

Is that wrong? No.

Yin Tianqiu's seriousness unintentionally cost others.

But the problem is that because of these financial and interpersonal considerations, everyone in the current entertainment industry has to follow the same set of industrial rules. They continue to cater to the expectations of fans and grow into the same look in a similar mold.

almost eliminates the possibility of accidents.

So, this circle is a huge "prepared dish".

So in the end, those who want to do things seriously will probably only become the ones who fail and "go around" in the eyes of everyone.

The pictures in this article come from the Internet

Editorial Assistant: Mao Lian Lei Gong Mou Lang Hammer