On November 12, a hot search trended on the Internet. The name of this hot search is "Zhang Yimou said that what is broadcast on the Internet platform is not called a movie." The most popular publisher and "topic host" is "Farmer Channel". This "Farmer Channel" is Blue V certifie

On November 12, a hot search trended on the Internet. The name of this hot search is "Zhang Yimou said that what is broadcast on the Internet platform is not called a movie." The most popular publisher and "topic host" is "Farmer Channel". This "Farmer Channel" is Blue V certified, Hebei Radio and Television Station Farmer Channel. Many viewers outside Hebei Province don’t know this channel. It is a terrestrial channel of Hebei Station. The hot search

is itself problematic and is a misinterpretation of Zhang Yimou’s original words. After the Farmer Channel created this hot search, the text published is as follows:

Recently, in an interview, Zhang Yimou called on the audience to go to the theater to watch movies. He also said that the sense of ritual and immersion in watching movies cannot be replaced online, and the short video of movie commentary is really speechless...Zhang Yimou: "If a movie is broadcast on an Internet platform, it is not called a movie." After publishing this text content, the

Farmer Channel also Zhang Yimou's interview content was distributed accordingly. However, these interviews were edited. Although Zhang Yimou’s voice did include the words “If a movie is broadcast on an Internet platform, it would not be called a movie.” However, this voice has no beginning and no end, and is classified as a pinch. Cutting off the tail and leaving the middle is a typical quote out of context. (Part of the illustration in this article adopts the content of the movie poster directed by Zhang Yimou)

If a movie is broadcast on an Internet platform, it is not called a movie? This is obviously not the argument of director Zhang Yimou, but an argument maliciously edited by the Farmer Channel. Are film works broadcast on Internet platforms called movies? This is not controversial. Of course it's called a movie. Each of the major genuine video platforms has its own version of the movie channel. How can it be broadcast on the Internet and not be called a movie? This is obviously nonsense.

For the farmer channel that released this edited video, they seem to know better what it means to speculate in traffic. Trim the content of Director Zhang Yimou's interview, retain one or two controversial words, and throw it on the Internet in an attempt to sow discord between Director Zhang Yimou and netizens, stir up controversy, and gain traffic. This approach itself is Disgraceful. Professional media platform organizations should publish professional content. Where are the complete interview videos of Director Zhang Yimou and the unedited content of Director Zhang Yimou’s interview with the Farmer Channel?

This requires a positive response from the Farmer Channel.

Judging from these "out of context" fragmented words released by the Farmer Channel, I tend to believe that at that time, Director Zhang Yimou was talking about the difference in experience between watching movies in theaters and watching movies on other platforms. Director Zhang Yimou's words, The focus is on these differences in experience, not on who is called a movie and who is not. At the same time, what director Zhang Yimou denies is also the movie commentary content of watching a movie in three minutes, not the form of playing movies on the Internet.

"Watching a movie in three minutes" is first of all an infringement of movie copyright. All the movies have been edited into the stories of Xiaomei and Xiaoshuai, and the video content comes from the original film content without copyright. These "three-minute movies" are not authorized by the film copyright owner. The popularity of this kind of thing is itself an infringement of film intellectual copyright.

Secondly, the popularity of such things is also harmful to the IQ of movie fans. I tend to think that Zhang Yimou seriously discussed the problems of this type of quick interpretation works in the interview, and the Peasant Channel edited out the parts of director Zhang Yimou's serious interpretation and focused on the words that may cause misunderstandings among netizens. Their behavior is wrong. Yes, it's disgusting.

Why does "watching a movie in three minutes" damage the IQ of movie fans? Because this kind of content seems to directly give a story, in fact, it damages the beauty of the details of the movie. Movie fans who always eat these "instant noodles" have lost the ability to eat real good noodles. Fans who are addicted to "three minutes" have also lost the ability to accept the narration of a film. This group of people have entered a truly impetuous state, and are more like useless people.

We often see drunkards who can no longer listen to other people's words. They are addicted to their own convoluted words and have lost their basic logical thinking ability. Many of the content of "Three Minutes Movie" is to train its audience in the direction of drunkards, allowing them to indulge in this kind of "happiness" that does not require thinking. A truly excellent movie requires thinking, and it achieves this thinking through its own details. Director Zhang Yimou was interviewed and criticized the content of these quick "movie watching", which is really responsible for the brains of movie fans.

I believe that the reporters from the Farmer Channel understand the original words of Director Zhang Yimou. I believe even more that Director Zhang Yimou’s interview has a detailed argumentation process, is well-intentioned, and has real value.However, after the Farmer Channel was released, it was very wrong to take it out of context and try to win over the audience! Good and valuable interview content was ruined by a malicious hot search. Farmer Channel is sorry for its media responsibilities! (Text/Ma Qingyun)