"Hua Er and Youth Silk Road Season" (hereinafter referred to as "Hua Shao 5") received an astonishing high score of 9.2 on Douban, reshaping the "flower school" that was mainly characterized by "tearing" in the past, and also gave The guests who participated in "Hua Er and Boy 5" brought considerable bonuses, which inevitably "tempted" some celebrities to participate in "Hua Er and Boy 6" (hereinafter referred to as "Hua Shao 6").
The nine stars who participated in "Flowers and Boys 6"
After "Flowers and Boys 6" aired, I wonder if the stars who worked hard to get the chance to star will regret it. "Hua Shao 6" has been controversial since its broadcast, and "Hua Xue" has resurfaced on the Internet - not the "Hua Xue" reshaped by "Hua Shao 5", but the tone set by the originator of "Hua Shao 2" "Flower Science".
There is a huge disparity in ratings between "Hua Shao 5" and "Hua Shao 6"
Stars at the forefront of public opinion this season are Zhou Yutong , Rong Zishan , Hou Minghao and other stars. There are all kinds of "flower learning courseware" everywhere on the Internet, summarizing various black spots in the program for netizens.
The rise of "Hua Xue" or "X Xue" reveals profound changes in netizens' attitudes towards watching variety shows. In the past, people viewed variety shows more as a form of entertainment, pursuing a lighthearted laugh or a short-term emotional release; but now, many netizens view variety shows with an analytical and even "academic" attitude, and dig deeper into the guests of the programs. various details. Of course, it’s not really about discussing and learning about variety shows as a subject, but rather capturing the stars’ subtle expressions under the camera, the subtext in their words, and even their inadvertent little movements, and magnifying and interpreting them to gain insights and insights. , deconstruction and other fun.
Many celebrities do not adapt to this interpretation, thinking that it is too harsh and that any flaws will be magnified. But this interpretation is actually the right of the audience. As the famous saying goes, "All gifts given by fate have already been marked with a secret price." When a star decides to participate in a reality show, when he gets a price he is satisfied with and hopes that the show will bring him expected benefits, It already implies that he is ready to be judged by the audience.
Today, as the entertainment industry is highly developed, reality shows have become an important stage for stars to showcase themselves and gain fame and fortune. For many stars, participating in reality shows is a need for career development and an effective way to increase their popularity and commercial value. Celebrities need to give up some of their rights - to put part of their private life and public image under the public eye and accept scrutiny and evaluation from all directions.
This kind of exposure is an inherent part of reality shows, and it is also the "price" that celebrities must bear to gain fame and fortune. Celebrities cannot want to gain fame and fortune through reality shows and not allow netizens to judge them. There is no such thing as such a good thing in the world.
However, this time "Hua Shao 6" caused a huge uproar in "Hua Xue", which still allows us to intuitively feel that in the current era of information explosion and short videos becoming mainstream, netizens' attitude towards judging reality shows Changes are also taking place. The most fundamental manifestation of
is: from the evaluation after watching the program to an online carnival-style trial. From a rough inspection,
has these characteristics.
The first feature is to watch programs in fragments.
Many viewers no longer rely on watching a complete program to obtain information and entertainment, but instead "piece together" the entire episode through clippings, highlight moments, and summary of controversial points on social media, short video platforms, or online forums. Awareness of the program. These clips are often carefully selected or edited to highlight moments of contradiction, conflict or contention, quickly attracting attention and sparking heated debate. In this fragmented consumption method, the audience can quickly obtain the essence of the program, and can also pay selective attention based on personal interests and participate in topic discussions.
For example, the duration of each episode of "Hua Shao 6" is two to three hours, and the intercepted clips may only be one or two minutes or dozens of seconds, which is really one-sided. Watching the program in fragments may lead to a one-sided understanding of the overall context of the program, character development and the stories behind it, causing some stars to suffer misunderstandings or excessive criticism without a comprehensive understanding.
Zhou Yutong went out to play and remembered to buy electrolyte water for the sick Song Qian
Rong Zishan asked the hotel front desk in English if he could cook noodles for the patient? After not getting a positive answer, he decided to go to a store one kilometer away to buy noodles
The second feature was to participate in the fun style.
Faced with a large number of variety shows that are highly homogeneous, the audience is eager to see more fresh and interesting content. When a program can provide enough topical material, it will naturally attract widespread attention. However, many netizens do not pursue a deep understanding of the program or a comprehensive viewing. Instead, they have a mentality of watching for fun, joining in the fun, having online carnivals, and killing boredom. They capture certain funny moments from short videos, or from hot searches. When you learn about a controversial point in the topic, you immediately join the discussion, leave a message, like it, or repost it to satisfy the immediate entertainment experience and the fun of social sharing. It also makes certain clips in the program quickly become a hot topic among the people. .
Under this superficial participation model, netizens are easily misled by one-sided information or deliberately edited clips, resulting in one-sided evaluations of programs or celebrities. For example, many netizens have never clicked on "Hua Shao 6" from beginning to end, but this does not affect their understanding of the various conflicts in "Hua Shao 6", nor does it affect their attitude toward a certain star participating in the show. Because of his strong dislike for him, he casually liked the star's negative comments.
The so-called "trial" by everyone Chen Hao is not that exaggerated. It means that everyone talks things out.
The third characteristic is moral judgment.
When viewers look at reality shows with a magnifying glass, any small action or casual remark made by a star may be magnified and interpreted, and rise to the height of morality and personality, thus triggering a large-scale online trial. Moral judgment is a dualistic, black-and-white way of thinking that divides things into black and white poles: good people and bad people, right and wrong. It ignores the complexity and multi-faceted nature of human nature, leading to a negative assessment of individual morality. Single negative review.
On Hou Minghao’s birthday, everyone secretly sent him blessings in a group photo that he couldn’t see, both thoughtful and innovative. Why does the whole Internet only focus on "4 people eating a meal for 9 people"?
Once a certain topic becomes a hot search, countless netizens will flock to join this moral trial. In this case, individual voices are often drowned in the emotions of the group, making it difficult for rational voices to be heard. The anonymity of the Internet also provides cover for some people, making them more bold when commenting, even using insulting language to express their opinions. The social media comment sections of some stars of "Hua Shao 6" have completely collapsed. Many comments have gone beyond the scope of reasonable evaluation and turned into character denial and insult.
The fourth characteristic is emotional catharsis.
Life in modern society is fast-paced and stressful. People need to find a way to release their inner tension and dissatisfaction. Reality shows that can extend "xology" have become an outlet for many people to vent their emotions because they are close to life and rich in interpretation space. Nowadays, many netizens like to use the word "judgment" when watching variety shows. This is sometimes a ridiculing term for "evaluation", but sometimes "trial" is a moral judgment that puts on colored glasses, preconceptions, and self-centeredness to find rationality for emotional catharsis. .
In "Hua Shao 6", some expressions of a certain star are intercepted one by one and then enlarged and interpreted. Even a simple expressionless face is interpreted as impatience or arrogance or "face", which in turn triggers a large number of negative comments . When exaggerated interpretations and insults about a star become the public opinion correct, "This is a loaded weapon thrown on the street, everyone - no matter villain or good - can use it." It is unfair to the star. , and also contributes to social hostility.
When Zhou Yutong was accused online of Song Qian's friends treating her to dinner, Zhou Yutong was "losing her face" and all kinds of speculation about her "badness"
However, in normal scenes, Zhou Yutong was clearly enjoying her meal.
Some people may say: You are this Who are you "whitewashing" for? In fact, there really isn't.After watching the show, I have to admit that some of the stars of "Hua Shao 6" did expose their unlikable sides in the reality show - this is a mistake made by the management team and the stars; their personalities are really not suitable for them. To participate in this kind of continuously recorded reality show is equivalent to asking celebrities to personally overturn the more popular personalities they have created through some successful characters.
But we must also say it objectively: the crime does not go so far, and the true crime does not go so far.
On the one hand, if you ask yourself and put yourself in someone else's shoes, not many people can stand to look at it like a magnifying glass. In reality shows, every move of the stars is captured and magnified by the camera, and every expression and every word is repeatedly scrutinized and interpreted by the audience. It is normal to have some flaws in this highly transparent environment. There is no reason for the audience to put themselves in the shoes of the stars, but making moral and personality judgments above and beyond the norm is quite arbitrary and leads to an even more intolerant social atmosphere.
This kind of "intolerance" is not only towards celebrities, but also towards our family, friends and colleagues around us. For example, in Xiaohongshu or Douban groups, netizens often post accusations against people around them. It is usually not a big problem, but the comment sections are almost exclusively filled with advice to "break off the relationship" or "break off the relationship." People are increasingly losing their basic tolerance for other people's mistakes and the respect they deserve when facing differences, and they often raise questions about their personal qualities. If things go on like this, it will only lead to tension in interpersonal relationships and aggravate the atomization of individuals.
On the other hand, some of the stars in the show have now become tainted in public opinion. Many viewers just put on black glasses and stare at their every move, word, deed, and expression on the show, interpreting them in various ways, or "making things out of nothing." "Either exaggerating less serious issues has deviated from the basic facts.
Although it is said that reality shows are filmed for the audience, and celebrities must be mentally prepared to be judged when participating in reality shows, watching variety shows in a trial style also requires abiding by certain boundaries and bottom lines. If you are making a derogatory evaluation of a person (this has nothing to do with whether he is a celebrity or not), if you have not watched the program in a relatively complete manner, or understand the causes and consequences of the clips, and after seeing the negative interpretation of him or her by KOLs or marketing accounts, please still ask Resist the urge to follow the criticism. Even if you really don’t like what he or she did in a certain matter after watching the show, you must be careful of extended criticism, emotional criticism, and moral criticism. You think you are seeing character through details—but you are selective. It's those "dark" details, and it turns out that you can see the leopard through it.
Don’t think this is just for fun. If you think about it, it’s terrible to “parade” a person online like this. This bad trend has fallen on a star this time. Do you think the "2.08 million" deserved it? Do you think the star is also red if he is black or red? Maybe he will become a top-notch person even if he is black and black; the problem is, once this kind of "trial" comes to pass, It is very likely that the trend will fall on ordinary people - this is already the case when chat records of various amateurs are publicly interrogated, and ordinary people will bear the real price.
