The national football team suffered a 0-7 defeat against the Japanese team in the first round of the top 18. This defeat was not only a score difference, but also a profound reflection on the current situation of Chinese football. Although one day has passed since that heart-wren

The national football team suffered a 0-7 defeat against the Japanese team in the first round of the top 18. This defeat was not only a score difference, but also a profound reflection on the current situation of Chinese football.

Although one day has passed since that heart-wrenching "tragedy", every scene on the field is still vivid in our minds, cutting the hearts of every Chinese fan like a sharp blade. Well-known reporter Liu Wenchao asked, who recommended Ivan to become the national football coach? No one from the Football Association will take responsibility? Liu Wenchao's question was direct and sharp, pointing directly at the responsibilities and responsibilities of the Chinese Football Association and head coach Ivan.

Behind this defeat, we have to face up to a problem, that is, the national football team exposed not only shortcomings at the technical and tactical level, but also huge mistakes in management decision-making. Ivan, the foreign coach who had high hopes, had his coaching ability met with unprecedented doubts in this game. As Liu Wenchao said, two weeks of careful preparation was completely overturned in less than half of the game. This was not only a denial of the tactical arrangement, but also a great test of the coaching team's adaptability.

What is even more puzzling is that a similar situation has happened in the previous top 36 games, which makes people wonder whether Ivan really understands and adapts to the soil of Chinese football, and whether he is really capable of leading this team. Is the national football team out of the trough? In addition, Ivan's statement after the game seemed objective, but in fact he was shirking his responsibility and passing the blame. Although there is some truth to his emphasis on "overestimating the abilities of Chinese players," as a professional coach, he should fully understand and evaluate the actual situation of the players when he takes over the team. If Ivan really believes that Chinese players have limited abilities, has he taken effective measures to make up for this shortcoming? Has a practical training plan been developed to improve the team's overall strength? Such a statement, direct blame, and refusal to apologize is really disappointing.

Obviously, judging from the results of the competition, his answer was not satisfactory. The Chinese Football Association, as the "parent" of the national football team, is also to blame for this defeat. Although the anti-corruption campaign has won public opinion for the Football Association, the selection of personnel for key positions does not seem to reflect the professionalism and transparency it deserves. What considerations were based on Ivan's appointment? What is the professionalism of the coaching team? Why can’t we see the Football Association’s clear plan and firm determination for the future of the national football team in Ivan? These questions not only linger in the minds of fans, but also become difficult problems that Chinese football has to face on the road to development.

In the face of a disastrous defeat, accountability is important, but more importantly, we must learn from the failure and take practical and effective measures to promote the development of Chinese football. For Ivan, if his coaching philosophy is seriously out of touch with the current situation of the team, then changing the coach in time and finding a leader more suitable for Chinese football will undoubtedly be a top priority. As for the Chinese Football Association, it needs to carry out profound reflection and reform from the institutional level and establish a more scientific, transparent and professional decision-making mechanism to ensure that every decision can truly serve the long-term planning of Chinese football.

The national football team suffered a 0-7 defeat against the Japanese team in the first round of the top 18. This defeat was not only a score difference, but also a profound reflection on the current situation of Chinese football.

Although one day has passed since that heart-wrenching "tragedy", every scene on the field is still vivid in our minds, cutting the hearts of every Chinese fan like a sharp blade. Well-known reporter Liu Wenchao asked, who recommended Ivan to become the national football coach? No one from the Football Association will take responsibility? Liu Wenchao's question was direct and sharp, pointing directly at the responsibilities and responsibilities of the Chinese Football Association and head coach Ivan.

Behind this defeat, we have to face up to a problem, that is, the national football team exposed not only shortcomings at the technical and tactical level, but also huge mistakes in management decision-making. Ivan, the foreign coach who had high hopes, had his coaching ability met with unprecedented doubts in this game. As Liu Wenchao said, two weeks of careful preparation was completely overturned in less than half of the game. This was not only a denial of the tactical arrangement, but also a great test of the coaching team's adaptability.

What is even more puzzling is that a similar situation has happened in the previous top 36 games, which makes people wonder whether Ivan really understands and adapts to the soil of Chinese football, and whether he is really capable of leading this team. Is the national football team out of the trough? In addition, Ivan's statement after the game seemed objective, but in fact he was shirking his responsibility and passing the blame. Although there is some truth to his emphasis on "overestimating the abilities of Chinese players," as a professional coach, he should fully understand and evaluate the actual situation of the players when he takes over the team. If Ivan really believes that Chinese players have limited abilities, has he taken effective measures to make up for this shortcoming? Has a practical training plan been developed to improve the team's overall strength? Such a statement, direct blame, and refusal to apologize is really disappointing.

Obviously, judging from the results of the competition, his answer was not satisfactory. The Chinese Football Association, as the "parent" of the national football team, is also to blame for this defeat. Although the anti-corruption campaign has won public opinion for the Football Association, the selection of personnel for key positions does not seem to reflect the professionalism and transparency it deserves. What considerations were based on Ivan's appointment? What is the professionalism of the coaching team? Why can’t we see the Football Association’s clear plan and firm determination for the future of the national football team in Ivan? These questions not only linger in the minds of fans, but also become difficult problems that Chinese football has to face on the road to development.

In the face of a disastrous defeat, accountability is important, but more importantly, we must learn from the failure and take practical and effective measures to promote the development of Chinese football. For Ivan, if his coaching philosophy is seriously out of touch with the current situation of the team, then changing the coach in time and finding a leader more suitable for Chinese football will undoubtedly be a top priority. As for the Chinese Football Association, it needs to carry out profound reflection and reform from the institutional level and establish a more scientific, transparent and professional decision-making mechanism to ensure that every decision can truly serve the long-term planning of Chinese football.