" Rose Story " starring Liu Yifei has been on the air for three days and has nine episodes. Netizens' comments are obviously polarizing, but it seems that Liu Yifei's promoters are hyping up the quality, and even use "Liu Yifei's new drama's reputation has plummeted" to gain respect. It's dumbfounding.
I really want to know, doesn’t the promoter of this hot search feel guilty? Because when I opened the topic, the contents were all about using data to prove the popularity and ratings of "The Story of a Rose", but there was no set of data on word-of-mouth, and there was not even a good review report. I would like to ask, "The reputation has declined." "Where does the evidence come from?
On the contrary, after watching nine episodes of "Rose Story", I really want to strongly appeal to the relevant departments to remove "Rose Story" from the shelves!
Because this drama is real! exist! destroy! three! Watch!
Please, don’t use the guise of feminism to convey wrong views. Let’s not talk about a few weird male characters. The screenwriter and director created them critically and presented them to the audience as real negative teaching materials.
But the heroine Huang Yimei conveys wrong and deformed ideas to the audience in all aspects of thinking, interpersonal relationships, life philosophy, etc. She does not know how many young men and women she will lead. Such a work is worse than nothing.
The most basic rules of life for girls, "The Story of Rose" is wrong. The first two episodes of the TV series staged a bloody drama of temporarily escaping from marriage and falling in love with another person. Zhou Shihui, who was about to get married, coveted Huang Yimei's beauty and temporarily decided not to marry his fiancée Guan Zhizhi, but to pursue Huang Yimei.
Although a scumbag is a scumbag, is Huang Yimei not wrong at all? She knew that Zhou Shihui was about to get married, but she still kept a distance from him and accepted his invitations to eat and drink coffee. When the other party gave him the gift of a bracelet, she must have known that he was in love with her, but she did not refuse or warn him righteously. Is it really okay to continue to indulge the other person's troubles while enjoying the vanity of being sought after by men and the material desires of eating and drinking?
Huang Yimei’s behavior is very different from the current trend of “grabbing women”. She just had to ask Zhou Shihui for money! This is not to say that the responsibility for Zhou Shihui's regretful marriage should be entirely attributed to Huang Yimei, but who can say that she has no responsibility at all? We often say that a gentleman should not stand under a dangerous wall. In the same way, women should consciously and vigilantly stay away from scumbags. Even if they are not scumbags, as long as they are married or have a lover or are about to get married, they should maintain appropriate The distance is correct, right? If girls all followed the same example and committed crimes based on sex, wouldn't this society be in chaos?
Various examples in the workplace are also wrong.
While watching the drama, I kept lamenting that the screenwriter and director made things up randomly and had no understanding of the workplace. If someone like Huang Yimei appeared in real life, a novice with no background and no foundation in the workplace would have died countless times.
In the job interview, she raised her b so high! There is nothing wrong with a TV series having the aura of a protagonist, but is it misleading the audience if it is also done in a workplace drama? Facing a row of interviewers, Huang Yimei had no idea what modesty was. She said that studying was her comfort zone. She would borrow silk scarves from strangers when she saw them, and sit there with an air of arrogance and no-one else. If I am the character played by Wan Qian . I will definitely be the first to pass her.
made mistakes in every scene after joining the company. Su Gengsheng is his boss, equivalent to his master and superior. Skipping the superior and directly contacting the leader to connect with Mr. Teng, this kind of leapfrogging to ask for credit is a taboo in the workplace, right?
had a workplace romance before the probation period was over, fell in love through work, and her boyfriend was in a competitor's company. She publicly displayed her affection and everyone knew about it. Such a catchy plot was beyond the imagination of the screenwriter.
Zhuang Guodong seemed to have become the leader of the team inexplicably, and then they had a meeting together and played devil's advocate throughout the whole process in order to attract the other party's attention. How did Huang Yimei get the confidence that the other party liked her? If not, Zhuang Guodong would have ordered him to get out! Everyone must not imitate Huang Yimei, otherwise you may die ten or eight times in one meeting.
For newcomers to the workplace, their work rules should be to see more, listen more, do more and talk less. But Huang Yimei is just the opposite. She wears eye-catching fashions every day. Her work is like a runway show. She goes on business trips with her boss Su Gengsheng. She talks loudly in the exhibition hall and dances on her own without caring about the other person's feelings. If she does one thing right, she will let her do it. The other person praises himself. Watch
to see the vulnerable side of Su Gengsheng on the phone. At this time, the right choice for a newbie in the workplace is to pretend not to see it and keep everything he sees rotten in his stomach. In reality, if he holds an umbrella like Huang Yimei, the next plot will definitely happen. Instead of having dinner together, I received a notice of dismissal the next day. I really wanted to advise the screenwriter and director not to mislead the audience again. If they can't do this, don't broadcast it.
There are still many unrealistic and wrong things. For example, you are the one who made your relationship public and let your personal feelings affect your work. But your boss asked you to communicate with your boyfriend about an opportunity to meet Mr. Teng, so you got serious and decisively refused? These are some earthy Mary Su plots, I’m too lazy to list them all.
's emotional depiction is so wrong that it's not too much to say it's bloody or deformed.
The scumbag man cheated on her with confidence, as if there was nothing wrong with her as long as it was love. It seems that they have forgotten that one of the essential differences between humans and animals is that humans have moral restraints and a sense of shame. But it is true that the TV series portrays Zhou Shihui as a scumbag, but it does not hold a critical attitude towards his cheap love.
I met once or twice, but did not have in-depth contact or serious contact. After sending a few messages and making a phone call, I saw Zhuang Guodong who came to greet him at the airport. They immediately had sex, kissed passionately in the elevator, took off their clothes and went to bed, and had sex. To put it nicely, this is love at first sight; to put it more unpleasantly, isn't this just a one-night stand where urban men and women vent their desires? They even kissed more than a dozen times in two episodes. Who are you disgusting and misleading?
The social atmosphere is already bad enough. "The Story of a Rose" does not promote the three correct views. Instead, it uses unhealthy trends as the main theme, misconceptions as feminism, and describes being deceived by a scumbag as taking advantage of oneself. "The Rose Story" The story of "Three Views" is really problematic. Shouldn’t this kind of film and television waste be removed from the shelves?
Finally, I forgot to watch the fifth or sixth episode, and I began to understand why the creative team did not think about such a plot and such three views and turned a blind eye. When Su Gengsheng, played by Wan Qian, was making a cup of latte, an advertisement for a certain milk appeared.
As we all know, starring Liu Yifei made "The Story of a Rose" an S+-level drama on the platform. It has achieved outstanding broadcast results and has many advertisements at the beginning, middle, and end. The platform charges different prices for different locations and different episodes. Pre-roll ads and implanted ads are even more different. Generally speaking, the implanted ads that are the first to cooperate are definitely more expensive.
scolded the producers and directors for their lack of moral integrity, but it was absolutely not an injustice to them. The first episode of "The Story of a Rose" explained that the time background was in 2001. When the original wife came to tear up the "mistress" Huang Yimei, the TV was broadcasting the successful bid for the Olympics. But Moudian Milk was a brand only launched in 2006! Is it an obvious bug that appeared in the plot that took place in 2001? I can see it all at a glance, and I don’t believe that the director, props, and art didn’t discover or doubt it.
The answer can only be for all parties to turn a blind eye. After all, making money is the most important and practical thing.
Based on this premise, everything else is not important. The plot is not important, the Mary Sue is not important, and the three perspectives are not important. On the contrary, the more this happens, the higher the ratings, the more discussions, and the happier the sponsor fathers are.
Seeing this, have you noticed that many scenes in "The Story of a Rose" are actually no different from the popular short dramas that destroy the three views, except that the vulgar fans are replaced by Liu Yifei.
