The latest big news in the entertainment industry is actually being staged every day. Of course, many of them look exciting, but they cannot withstand scrutiny. It is obvious that some artists are just deliberately hyping up to gain traffic. Such cases are actually everywhere, in

The new big things in the entertainment industry are actually being staged every day. Of course, many of them seem very exciting, but they cannot stand up to scrutiny. It is obvious that some artists are just deliberately hyping up to gain traffic. In fact, such cases abound, both men and women It is not uncommon for celebrities to deliberately create CPs for fun in order to hype up their popularity.

For example, last month, it was soon revealed that Mao Xiaohui was acting in a new drama, and then deliberately released her relationship with Qin Junjie. Not to mention that the analysis of some netizens was indeed sound. Of course, it was only the netizens after all. It's just speculation. It's not certain whether Mao Xiaohui did this intentionally.

Recently, Taiwan’s well-known entertainment paparazzi Ge Si Qi released heavy news on social platforms, and this time the news seems to be very topical and will definitely be on the hot search, because Ge Si Qi said "A certain artist is more hateful than Huang Zijiao"!

It is true that every time Geschi breaks the news, it will cause a huge network effect. After all, although Geschi is not a big shot, he is a confirmed super entertainment paparazzi and has exposed many big names. For this reason, he is undoubtedly There are many fan groups, and many netizens also trust Geschi's words very much.

However, there are still people who have doubts about Geschi's explosive news. First of all, although Geschi broke the news, he never announced the name of the artist. For this reason, many netizens suspected that Geschi was doing it on purpose. of traffic.

As for netizens’ suspicion that Geschi was trying to gain traffic, Geschi himself noticed it, so he posted a screenshot of a private chat and admitted that “society doesn’t understand journalists’ helplessness.”

Youge, a netizen responded to Ge Siqi in the comment area like this:

Mr. Ge, I have always mistakenly thought that you are a person who upholds justice. It turns out that you are just a paparazzi who is trying to attract traffic. You are not thinking about the next generation of Taiwan at all. Please remove it. I gave you the factual report on your Facebook, and I feel like I was completely used by you! Different road non-phase plan! I am a Leo with a strong sense of justice. It is extremely abominable that you still behave when you get an advantage!

And Geschi’s response is this:

If you are sick, you must see a doctor and take medicine! !

is not a character but a victim. After she broke the news in private, she started to post a bunch of news and texts that had nothing to do with the incident itself. Finally, she asked me to guess riddles late at night. I didn’t want to pay attention to you at all. I politely told you that this time was an interruption, and then she herself loved to be messy. Guess was still annoyed, and then said Huang Zijiao..., please this teacher, please control yourself, you have already disturbed me!

I am not a doctor. If you are sick, go to a doctor. If you have any information, go to a reporter.

I am starting to worry about current students!

Society does not understand the helplessness of journalists...

Judging from the conversation between this netizen and Geschi, it is indeed difficult to tell who is right and who is wrong? First of all, although Geschi has exposed a lot of shocking information before, paparazzi are paparazzi after all, and they are naturally not messengers of justice. They also have to eat, and it is definitely possible to sometimes "add fuel to the fire" in order to eat.

As for this netizen, judging from the text he posted, he initially thought that Geschi was a righteous paparazzi, but unexpectedly he was wrong and was exploited by Geschi, which made him feel very sad. The nest fire.

Maybe this netizen is indeed a righteous person, or he may have other purposes.

How can I put it? It is true that many big names in the entertainment industry were basically exposed by the paparazzi, but sometimes we as people who eat melons cannot completely believe it. After all, it is just one-sided words of the paparazzi. We need to be dialectical at all times. Looking at the problem from the perspective of others, when encountering something that cannot be concluded, why not "let the bullets fly for a while"?