local time on November 10, Gao Yunxiang's case entered the 13th day. He appeared in a suit with sunglasses and was accompanied by a lawyer to the court.
Source: Australia's new fast network
This week is the third week of the trial of Chinese movie star Gao Yunxiang and another Chinese man Wang Jing on the suspected rape of a Chinese woman at the Shangri-La Hotel in Sydney in March last year. Gao Yunxiang appeared relaxed when he arrived in court. .
Yesterday, after the husband of the woman who could not be named due to legal reasons finished her testimony, another female witness who had worked for the woman and a foreign filmmaker who had worked with the crew testified.
The woman’s husband was accused of tearing in public at the banquet
Today’s second witness was a foreigner who had worked for the crew. The main communication object was the woman, who had never communicated with Gao Yunxiang.
The court heard that the witness attended the finale banquet when the woman’s family was present. He noticed that the woman’s husband was unhappy. When prosecutor
asked the witness about the process of communicating with the woman that night, the witness claimed that the woman told him that she had been sexually assaulted and had already called the police. The prosecutor asked "Did you notice his husband's condition?" The witness said, "He was very unhappy." When the prosecutor asked, "Why do you say that?" The witness replied: "He is crying." Dr.
said that the woman had taken contraception. Medicine
The first witness today is the doctor who examined the woman on the morning of March 17 after the incident. The prosecutor first interviewed her.
The court heard that although the woman said that her vagina and oral cavity had been violated when she told the doctor about the incident, the doctor found no abnormalities when she examined her oral cavity.
But there is a bruise behind the woman's left knee, some marks on her left leg, and some red and purple marks on her right leg.
When the prosecutor asked the doctor if he had examined the woman's neck, the doctor said that he did the examination, but found no abnormalities or injuries.
The court heard that the doctor looked sad when seeing the woman. At that time, the woman was on the fifth day of her menstrual period and refused the request for vaginal examination, but the doctor did not remember the reason for her refusal. When the prosecutor
asked the woman what she was doing during the physical examination, the doctor pointed out that her record was that the woman was very anxious and unhappy.
The court heard that the woman had taken contraceptives afterwards, but the doctor said that she could not remember who gave her the advice to take the medicine.
Wang Jing’s lawyer asked the doctor whether taking contraceptives was a routine procedure for such incidents, and the doctor affirmed.
When Wang Jing’s lawyer asked, “But in this case, there was no vaginal penetration, right?” The doctor replied: “That’s what the woman said.”
(Editor in charge: Yang Ming_NV5736)
