On April 3, a piece of news about Nanjing University’s 2024 postgraduate entrance examination admission announcement attracted widespread attention on the Internet. According to public documents, when a candidate named Xu applied for the particle physics and nuclear physics major at Nanjing University, he ranked first in the major with a preliminary test score of 369 points, an interview score of 137.78 points, and a comprehensive score of 506.78 points. However, what is surprising is that despite being far ahead in overall scores, the candidate was not admitted due to unsatisfactory interview scores. The incident of
quickly aroused heated discussion on the Internet. Many netizens have questioned the admission standards of Nanjing University, believing that it seems biased to deny admission to a candidate with such excellent overall performance simply because he failed in the interview. At the same time, some voices pointed out that the interview is an important part of examining the overall quality of the candidates, and its failure may reflect the candidates' deficiencies in other aspects besides professional knowledge.
Nanjing University has not yet made an official response to this incident. However, some education experts pointed out that when recruiting students, colleges and universities, in addition to focusing on candidates’ test scores, should also comprehensively consider factors such as their scientific research potential, teamwork ability, and innovative spirit. The interview session is an important assessment window, which can intuitively understand the candidate's comprehensive quality and adaptability.
This incident also reminds candidates that during the preparation process, they should not only focus on the accumulation of professional knowledge, but also comprehensively improve their overall quality to cope with various possible assessment links. At the same time, for colleges and universities, how to formulate admissions standards more scientifically and fairly to ensure that every outstanding candidate gets a fair opportunity is also a question worth pondering.
The Nanjing University School of Physics graduate admissions incident has triggered heated discussions across the Internet.
html On April 3, a piece of news about the enrollment of graduate students in the School of Physics of Nanjing University attracted widespread attention in Nanjing, Jiangsu and even across the country. According to news on the Internet, a candidate who achieved outstanding results in a professional course examination was eliminated because he failed in the ideological and moral assessment. This matter not only involves academic evaluation, but also touches on public concerns about the bottom line of morality.It is reported that this candidate stood out in the particle physics and nuclear physics major with an excellent score of 506.78 points in the preliminary and re-examinations, ranking first. However, information released by the School of Physics of Nanjing University shows that the candidate "failed the re-examination." The reason behind this makes people curious.
html On April 3, some media learned from the relevant departments of Nanjing University that the information transmitted online was not groundless. According to staff, the school's Graduate School has indeed received many complaints about this candidate recently, which pointed out that he had committed serious acts of torturing and killing cats, and even joined an online gang that took pleasure in torturing cats. These behaviors not only violate social ethics, but also run counter to the concept of colleges and universities cultivating talents with both ability and political integrity.
Faced with media inquiries, the staff of the graduate admissions working group of the School of Physics of Nanjing University admitted that they had indeed received relevant reporting materials and paid great attention to the matter. In the re-examination, the ideological and moral assessment is an indispensable part, and the school also has a specialized department responsible for investigating this. After comprehensive consideration, the candidate was ultimately not admitted because he failed the ideological and moral assessment.
Once this incident was reported, it immediately triggered extensive discussions from all walks of life. Some people believe that college admissions should not only focus on academic performance, but also the moral character of candidates; others believe that those who make mistakes should be given the opportunity to reform. But in any case, this incident reminds us that while pursuing academic achievements, we must not ignore moral cultivation and considerations.
Nanjing University’s particle physics major refuses to abuse cat candidates: Justice should not be obscured by grades.
Recently, a shocking news came out: this year's number one candidate in the particle physics and nuclear physics major at Nanjing University was eliminated because of an incident involving cat abuse. This candidate studied at the School of Civil Engineering of Southeast University for his undergraduate degree. He had excellent grades, but he hid cruel behavior behind his back.
According to reports, the candidate tortured and killed a cat in the school dormitory and recorded the video and uploaded it to the Internet.In the leaked footage, he put an innocent cow cat into a bucket and then cruelly stamped on the cat's head. This behavior is not only outrageous, but also shows extreme disregard for life.
Regarding this incident, netizens expressed their support for Nanjing University’s just decision of denying admission. They believe that no matter how good a grade is, it should not hide the unethical behavior behind it. Academic achievements are important, but moral character cannot be ignored either. How can a person who does not even have basic compassion contribute to human society in the future?
This decision of Nanjing University undoubtedly sends a clear message to society: while pursuing academic achievements, we cannot ignore the consideration of moral character. Academics and ethics are indispensable. As a palace of higher education, universities should not only cultivate students' professional skills, but also focus on shaping their personality and quality.
We hope that this incident can cause more people to reflect, not only on the candidates, but also on the entire society. How should we treat animals? How to cultivate the moral character of the next generation? These questions deserve our deep thought. At the same time, we also hope that Nanjing University will continue to adhere to such just decisions in future admissions and provide society with more talents with both ability and political integrity.
