March 16
"Father hopes that AI will resurrect Qiao Renliang's video and it will be taken off the shelves as soon as possible"
The topic has rushed to the hot search list
Recently
Some online bloggers use AI technology to "resurrect" deceased stars. The practice is controversial
And in the video comment area
Someone took the opportunity to promote ai to promote
paid services in the name of warmth...
Qiao Renliang's father made an angry statement:
This is unacceptable and should be removed from the shelves as soon as possible.
According to @潇湘Morning News, on March 16, in response to the infringement of the use of his son's portrait, Qiao Renliang's father said that he had seen the video of "son being resurrected" that was spread on the Internet. could not accept it and felt uncomfortable. He hoped that the other party would take it off the shelves as soon as possible. "They did not ask for our consent. It was my niece who saw the video and sent it to me. Yes, this is exposing scars."
In response, many netizens said:
Respect the deceased
This is the minimum bottom line a human being should have
Some netizens said: It is recommended to sue!
In addition to Qiao Renliang
, others who have been digitally restored include Coco Lee, Leslie Cheung, Godfrey Gao, etc.
Public figures who have passed away from us
"Coco Lee" sat in front of the camera and greeted the audience, but the video and sound were generated by AI. Eight people have died. Months later, she was suddenly digitally immortalized, and said to her fans: "From the moment I left this world, I have always felt your endless love and support."
claimed that technology is heart-warming
, but in fact it was a shrewd " The publisher of "Abacus"
claims that this is a way of emotional comfort that uses high technology to provide emotional value to living people; however, in the video comment area, many netizens questioned: This kind of behavior is in the name of warmth, but in fact it is... Consuming people who have left.
A reporter has contacted and interviewed multiple AI resurrection accounts. During the interview, we found that many of these accounts that claim to use high technology to heal people’s hearts have professional teams behind them, and some are even recruiting apprentices and agents in their circle of friends. claims to be a technology that warms people's hearts, but in fact, it has a shrewd "calculation" to use AI to change the faces of dead stars, divert traffic, and charge fees.
html On March 13, the reporter contacted the blogger who posted the video, and the other party quickly sent a fee list, which simply stated: There is no charge for making videos of deceased artists, but resurrecting other deceased people requires authorization for a certain manual fee. The diverted users need to transfer 198-598 yuan to the person behind the account according to the duration and presentation effect, and complete the transaction through WeChat and Alipay.
(AI video quotation sent by an online blogger)
Regarding "AI resurrecting the dead"
Netizens are controversial that if they pay to "resurrect" their relatives and friends
it is understandable to express feelings of longing
but if it is used to resurrect Is it illegal to use
by deceased celebrities or other people for profit or other purposes? Should
be banned?
Lawyer’s interpretation:
The portrait and reputation of the deceased are still protected by law
Lin Zhaorun, director of the management committee and senior partner of Guangdong Jinlun Law Firm, said that if AI resurrects a deceased star without the consent of the deceased’s close relatives, may constitute infringement. . Although Article 13 of the Civil Code of our country stipulates that a natural person does not have the capacity for civil rights after death, which means that it is not accurate to directly infringe the portrait rights and reputation rights of the deceased, in fact, his personal rights and interests are still protected by law. According to Article 994 of the Civil Code of my country, if the name, portrait, reputation, honor, privacy, remains, etc. of a deceased person are infringed upon, his spouse, children, and parents have the right to request the perpetrator to bear civil liability in accordance with the law. For this reason, when relatives of the deceased believe that the deceased's portrait, reputation, etc. have been infringed, they have the right to file a civil lawsuit in accordance with the above-mentioned legal provisions to safeguard legitimate rights and interests.
However, some producers and publishers believe that as long as it is not for profit and not used for commercial purposes, there will be no risk of infringement? In this regard, Zhao Nuhuan, a lawyer at Shanghai Rongli Tianwen (Guangzhou) Law Firm, said that regardless of whether is for commercial purposes, AI resurrects the deceased without the consent of the deceased's relatives, which may cause harm to the deceased's close relatives. Damage to spiritual interests or property interests, this behavior not only violates the law, but also violates social ethics and moral bottom lines.
If you think your rights and interests have been infringed, lawyer Zhao Nuhuan suggests that relatives of the deceased can file a lawsuit in court to defend their rights and require the infringer to bear civil liability, including compensation for losses and elimination of impacts. Before filing a lawsuit, it is recommended to collect and fix relevant evidence, such as images of deceased persons resurrected by AI, transmission channels, scope and impact, and identity information of alleged infringers. At the same time, due to the high variability of Internet data, Internet data can be extracted, preserved and authenticated through notarization to enhance the credibility and legal effect of the evidence.
What do you think?
