The new season of the American Professional Football League has entered the fourth round. In a game that ended earlier, Messi's Inter Miami team unexpectedly lost 2-3 to Montreal, suffering its first defeat of the new season. . In this game, Messi did not appear in the squad due to injury. He served as a spectator on the sidelines throughout the game. But what is outrageous is that even if he did not appear on the field, Messi was still rated as the player of the game by the media. Man of the match!
Goal.com, a relatively well-known international football media, published an article saying that although Messi did not play, he was the "best player" in the game. Maybe people will think that a player who did not participate in the game won the MVP. It's rare, but for the Inter Miami team, Messi is so important. The Argentinian is the glue of Inter Miami. Only he can connect the team together well. Once he loses him, they will also lose the way forward!
Fans couldn't sit still for the outrageous selection results of "Goal.net". Everyone left messages and attacked it. Some fans commented: "This conclusion is too absurd. If the selection is based on this logic, then should Maradona be chosen as the best player in every game of the Argentine team? After all, he is Argentina's first generation football king. He led Argentina to win the World Cup!" Some fans wrote: "There is no limit to how much you can lick Messi. It's best not to play. So what do the winning Montreal players think?"
Some fans also said: " Let’s just change the name of the Golden Globe Award to the Messi Award, and then change the name of the World Footballer to Mr. Closest to Messi.” In response to this, the famous CCTV sports commentator Han Qiaosheng couldn’t sit still, and he directly said it in his Angrily criticized the article on social media: "This article is indeed meant to create a gimmick, and the content has always been self-justifying, why would Messi be awarded the MVP when he did not play. In fact, the problem lies in the beginning of this article. Finally, the content behind it has been talking about Messi's tactical status at Inter Miami. Even though "goal" is indeed well-known in the sports media industry, I still want to say that what this article wrote is "a different story than a horse's mouth."
Messi played a total of 4 games for Inter Miami in the new season, contributing 4 goals and 1 assist. His performance was indeed remarkable. But even Messi was named the best of the match even though he didn't make an appearance. It's a bit unjustifiable. This flattery of "Goal.com" was taken in the wrong place!
