Live broadcast rooms are not closed private rooms like those in reality, nor are they private spaces for wanton indulgence. To attract attention by telling such "illegal past events" is obviously misguided.
According to Qilu Evening News, recently, a Weibo Netizens posted reports on the anti-counterfeiting Internet celebrity "Tietou Punishes Evil and Promotes Good" in the live broadcast room to talk about his experience of being tricked into looking for pornographic services many years ago. The screen recording video shows that "Tietou" claimed in the live broadcast room that he spent 1,800 yuan to find two masseurs 89 years ago, but was tricked. "It doesn't matter, right? The prosecution period has passed." In response, relevant parties responded to the netizen saying that they would verify and deal with it.
↑screen recording video screenshot
Relevant departments have now stepped in to verify whether it is true or false, legal issues, etc. There should be an explanation in the follow-up. For legal matters, just follow legal regulations and procedures. However, we can see deeper problems from the behavior of "Tietou".
The first thing that needs to be clarified is, what kind of occasion is the live broadcast room? It is public and open, and theoretically anyone can enter, even minors. The live broadcast room is not the closed private rooms in reality, nor is it a private space for wanton indulgence. It may be okay to chat about some things in private, but in a public live broadcast room, this is not appropriate.
Moreover, judging from the context and semantics of his words, "Tietou" seems to be quite indifferent to this illegal behavior, and is obviously promoting an unhealthy value.
In June 2022, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism jointly issued the "Code of Conduct for Online Anchors", which mentioned that "Online anchors should adhere to the correct political direction, public opinion guidance and value orientation, advocate social morality, abide by professional ethics, and cultivate personal morality. , adhere to a healthy style and taste, and consciously abandon vulgarity, vulgarity, kitsch and other low-level tastes..." "Tietou"'s words and deeds obviously violate this norm.
In addition, "Tietou" is also obviously suspected of diverting traffic. There was a detail in the live broadcast. Halfway through, "Tietou" told the netizens who were watching that he would like 200,000 likes before talking about what happened next... By telling such "illegal past events" to attract attention, he obviously read wrongly. .
The problem also arises. Since you know that what you did back then was illegal, why do you still say it proudly? This may be because I am used to being casual on weekdays, but when the occasion switches to a public live broadcast room, I can no longer stop the car. From the personal perspective of the person involved, is this not a self-exposure?
Public information shows that "Tietou" whose real name is Dong Mouming, is engaged in the clothing business in Guangzhou. His videos usually attract viewers with intense language and emotions. He claims to be a "messenger of justice" and is not afraid of sacrifice and does not seek fame or fortune. According to a search of a short video platform, "Tietou" currently has 5.156 million fans on the platform and has received nearly 20 million likes.
In fact, there are not a few such popular anchors. This also allows people to see that the rise of live broadcasts and short videos has given them the conditions to openly face the public. Although in the short term they can create a positive personality and attract some fans, over time, they will be lost if they are not careful. True images, ideas, and values are publicly exposed in cyberspace.
Perhaps, as "Tietou" said, the law can't do anything to him. But the law is the most basic and bottom-line moral requirement. In addition to the law, the Internet should also have the minimum public order and good customs. Regardless of whether what he said is true or not, and regardless of whether the "illegal story" he told can be traced and investigated, its impact is obviously negative. And such people can gather a certain number of fan groups, which may be something we should reflect on deeply.
Red Star News special commentator Zhai Li
(Source: Red Star News)
