" bottom line " is very interesting, although many people will skip the title when watching the show, but I usually watch it again, the title of this show has a certain warning significance, with a red line to interpret what is legal" bottom line"? A magic hammer gives the feeling of "finalizing the call".
The biggest highlight of this drama should be that it is the first TV series under the guidance of my country's Supreme Court . The entire storytelling context belongs to the type of big cases and small cases. Between several episodes, many cases will emerge at the same time. , and then try at different times. In fact, this is also to conform to the reality of the grassroots courts in my country and to be grounded.
Jin Dong : Can be a big brother or a younger brother
Jin Dong is a very magical actor in my opinion. He became popular before because of a " Pretender ". Hu Ge got a lot of attention, but later Jin Dong played Minglou 's eldest double spy, so he became popular all at once. Anyone who has watched "The Pretender" knows that he played the eldest brother, That's called "arrogance".
"The Bottom Line", the court judge Fang Yuan (Jin Dong) is the role of a court housekeeper. In the play, he has a nickname "Aunt Fang". From this nickname, you can see how much he is. Love meddling.
But these "busy things" are related to the common people. Although he works at the grassroots level, Fang Yuan's goal is to "safe the country and the country", because in his work he has always emphasized "many mediations that can be mediated, the task of the court is not Trial, but to solve the problem."
In fact, I think what he said is very reasonable, not to mention that criminal cases may have a clear line of demarcation between right and wrong, but civil cases involve some divorce, property, workplace Disputes, etc. These are not black and white matters. Sometimes they belong to "the public said that the public is reasonable and the mother said that the mother is reasonable". After the trial, those who are not satisfied will continue to seek trouble, and the contradiction between the two parties cannot be completely resolved. Therefore, Fang Yuan's belief that "solving problems is the ultimate goal" is completely correct. Why does
say that Jin Dong can be a big brother or a little brother? Because his play is a role in the middle position, there are bigger officials above, and there are also a bunch of small minions below.
So he met him, dared to speak out, but also dared to bow his head. The younger brother confessed his mistake very much like every person in the workplace. At first glance, he didn't look like the 2.8-meter big brother in "The Pretender". Maybe this is the proof that Jin Dong is a good actor, he makes us forget the actors and only remember the vivid characters.
did not follow the script, just live cases!
have to say that in recent years, radio and television are more and more willing to let the common people see some "bloody" social black faces, create art through reality, and then reflect on reality, in fact, this is a virtuous circle.
Anchor sudden death case
first talk about "anchor live broadcast sudden death case", in fact, in the current environment, Douyin is a popular part-time job for everyone, because it has the freedom anytime, anywhere, and Internet celebrities also belong to high-income groups, so Many grassroots will squeeze into this ranks. Let's take a look at the social environment. Why are there so many people on the short video track? That's because it hasn't been solidified and monopolized.
For example, some high-tech industries cannot be squeezed in by grassroots, so some people squeeze their heads, which just shows that this track is dynamic, and grassroots and elites still have the strength to fight. The key to the
"sudden death case" lies in whether there is a real labor relationship between the anchor and the contracted Internet celebrity company? If there is, then the anchor's family will be compensated. If not, the Internet celebrity company will win the case. What we found is that the routines of such companies have long been prepared to deal with disputes. The company does not sign labor contracts with the anchors, but replaces them with economic contracts.The relationship becomes a relationship of economic cooperation.
However, after the judges' inspection, the company's management of the anchors is actually a proof of labor relations. The anchors need to clock in when they go to work. They work according to the schedule every day, and they need to improve their performance during the holidays. Therefore, the company and the anchor are in a labor relationship in the actual sense.
If this concept is not easy to understand, you can use another method. For example, we now legally recognize a relationship as "de facto marriage". This kind of marriage does not have a certificate, but it can be investigated and collected. Then the relationship between the anchor and the company is similar to this. Although the contract does not meet the statutory requirements, the facts can be met and the lawsuit can be won.
The "sudden death case" has one of the biggest debates in public opinion. Was it the parents or the company that killed the girl? The parents belong to the style of Fan Shengmei 's parents, and the company belongs to capital squeeze. In fact, both parties are responsible for the death of the girl, but the final judgment must be based on the law, so the company lost the case.
Mother-humiliating homicide
Another case is "mother-humiliating homicide". The main point of contention in this case is "after the mother-humiliating behavior is stopped, is the motive for killing self-protection or intentional homicide?" People, so they can only be relatively objective and try their best to be objective, not completely. The person in charge of this case is Song Yufei ( Wang Xiuzhu ), the vice president of the Xing Court. She convicted the murderer of "intentional injury" in the first instance and sentenced her to life imprisonment.
After the verdict, the public opinion rose at this time, and the public opinion began to think that the sentence was wrong, because people would sympathize with the vulnerable groups, the murderer mother and son were the one who was violently collected debts, while the other side died was the loan shark social gangster. In common sense, it is obvious at a glance that who bullies whom, people begin to stand against the trial from the perspective of the mother and son of the murderer.
then held the second trial. Finally, considering that the son's murder was defensive in nature, the life sentence was changed to 5 years. The difference between the two judgments is huge, but it is difficult to tell who is right and who is wrong?
In fact, if we follow the law completely, we all know the truth of killing for life. No matter what the purpose is, killing is wrong. But in terms of self-defense, not defending one's own life is at risk, so this is a contradictory proposition.
Human nature is too complex, the law is the bottom line This is because the times are changing, and the emergence of many new contents makes the old laws no longer fit. Therefore, this drama also shows that the legal career in our country is constantly developing.
For example, the verdict of the "mother-humiliating murder case" mentioned in the play activates the zombie clause of "justifiable defense". Indeed, in the past, our stereotype believed that murderers must be heinous, but with the development of the times, we are becoming more and more Recognizing the complexity of human nature, some people kill for harm, and some for protection. Different starting points can make the same thing have a different nature.
I'm very pleased that now legal dramas are paying more and more attention to women's issues, such as sexual harassment in the workplace. In fact, in the past, many women dared not to speak out, because even if they called the police, they would eventually mediate, and everyone felt that this matter It's disgraceful to spread out, so I choose to calm down. The
stereotype belongs to the "victim guilt theory", which believes that women will not be harassed and provoked for no reason, but there must be a problem with their life style. But we found that this logic is not tenable. No matter whether there is a problem with a woman's life style, it is not a reason why others can harass her against her will. When someone touches her, she must be willing to do so. This is respect for women.
Finally, I think human nature is very complicated,There are male married bosses who sexually harass subordinates, and a poor family with violent debt collectors. In fact, when people do a wrong thing, their reason tells them that it is wrong, but they think that they are still far from the bottom line of the law, and they just violate the bottom line of morality, so they will let themselves go.
But we need to understand that the bottom line of the law is not the bottom line of being a human being. The law is only the minimum standard of morality. In daily life, morality is more important for one's own restraint. Virtue and ability to coordinate is the foundation of being respected by others.
