Leonardo DiCaprio , known as " little plum " in China, suddenly posted on his social account attacking China's fishery, saying that a large number of deep-sea fishing boats in China are catching fish. After running out of fish in his own waters, he began to go deep-sea fishing in other waters, which sounded the alarm for the economic and sustainable development of other countries.
He claims: "Over the past two decades, China has built its deep sea fishing fleet into the thousands, causing China to deplete its offshore fish stocks. In turn, their fishermen have sailed the world In other oceans around the world, deep-sea fishing continues. This practice has raised vigilance about the impact of the local economy and the sustainable development of marine life.” on the performance. Acted in a lot of film and television dramas, such as "'s growing pains ", "'s different sky ", " Romeo and Juliet ", " Titanic ", "How to Get Away with Murder", " Aviator " ", " Infernal Affairs ", "Blood Diamond", "Inception", "The Great Gatsby", "The Wolf of Wall Street" in 2016 with the movie "The Revenant" won the 73rd Golden Globe Award for the most Best Actor Award and Best Actor Award at the 88th Academy Awards was also awarded the United Nations "Messenger of Peace" by the United Nations.
However, academics and acting are not in the same latitude after all. You can act after middle school, but you need to use this level to study the problem of the marine fishery ecological chain, and even to comment on whether the marine fishing in other countries is transitional. It is absolutely unprofessional and also Not academic.
For nearly a hundred years, the United States has been one of the most anti-China countries in the world. So it is not surprising that an American star, no matter how much he speaks against China.
In the final analysis, we still don't have enough voice in the field of ocean fishing . It is not surprising that such a voice appears. When we have the right to speak commensurate with our own strength, or even become a talker, such a voice will naturally disappear. .
Sustainable utilization of fishery resources is indeed a global issue, because it is almost the most classic tragedy of the commons, which must be effectively resolved through the solidarity and cooperation of all countries. requires that countries in the world, whose population size, ocean conditions, consumption habits, farming techniques and other factors vary greatly, compromise with each other. It is not easy to reach a consensus, but this is by no means the reason for unilaterally blaming others when you are doing it yourself. .
From a single country, our fishing volume is indeed the highest in the world, but our aquaculture scale is even more unparalleled.
In this kind of thing, we have to be realistic. Our fishing volume is large because our own needs are sufficient, and secondly, because our aquaculture industry has a large number of export orders. We are a large exporter of aquatic products, and finally ours The no-fishing policy forces us to go to the ocean.
doesn't need him to say, we ourselves also pay much attention to the protection of the ecological environment, more than he pays more attention to the United States and Japan. The United States, Japan and Europe have such a huge demand for aquatic products, but looking at the scale of their aquaculture industry, it is not worthy to blame us at all.
"According to data from various authoritative websites, the nobles who occupy 0.01% of the world's population own 90% of the offshore waters, but they only catch 10% of the world's fish, while the poor who occupy 10% of the offshore waters actually consume the world's 90% fish, what a horrible fact."
