Introduction: " Bottom Line " is online, the opening is Wang Zhan, and the "Yu Huan Case" is put on the big screen. The content basically reproduces the details of Yu Huan's case. I have to say, I really dare to shoot.
is now online for six episodes. The two cases are very representative. The Yu Huan case is an adaptation of a true story, which basically restores the full picture of the case, so that many people can understand the story behind it. The female anchor Luo Youyou case, I personally feel that there are loopholes (Legal knowledge is shallow), see the follow-up development.
aside from the story content, the actors are also very good on the reverse side. The performance of , Jin Dong, and , the main actor, is really good. He can be regarded as getting rid of the greasy image of the president, and the role of Fang Yuan is very three-dimensional.
As the presiding judge of the case filing court, Jin Dong's performance in dealing with others, case analysis is really outstanding, coupled with his slight accent, he instantly changed Fang Yuan from a high-profile "boss". "After pulling it down, I have to say that Jin Dong has made great progress in the control of characters in recent years. In addition to Jin Dong,
's Ye Xin from Cai Wenjing, 's Ye Xin, Cheng Yi, 's Zhou Yi'an, Wang Xiuzhu's Song Yufei, Zhang Zhijian's president, Wang Jinsong's civil court judge Chen Kang, etc., all performed very well.
especially Zhang Zhijian, netizens ridiculed: " Qi Tongwei's account is useless, I can only change my identity and continue to practice Fang Yuan's trumpet!"
has at least six episodes so far, which can be regarded as a proper film The high-quality works, plot, acting, background, etc., have nothing to complain about.
Compared with many works under the banner, they actually have little value. "Bottom Line" depicts the daily work of the grassroots court, mediation, court proceedings and other scenes in great detail. At present, it is a rare good work. .
Of course, after the praise is over, I have to talk about some questions after watching the first six episodes!
1. The case of female anchor Luo Youyou has a lot of doubts
may be because I don't know the law, at least from the perspective of the plot, there are really several loopholes in this case, of course, the case has not yet come to an end, and the development of the story will eventually go How, is still unknown.
The issue of Luo Youyou's labor contract, this has been confirmed through investigation and evidence collection, and there is basically no problem. The key point is: Do Luo Youyou's parents need to take responsibility for Luo Youyou's death?
Through the plot, we learned that Luo Youyou's death was due to overwork, and in the whole case, Luo Youyou's parents continued to force Luo Youyou to take money, which played a key role.
This means that Luo Youyou took three days off during the May Day holiday and died unexpectedly on the May 4th live broadcast. Among them, there is evidence that Luo Youyou did not rest for three days during the holiday, and even before his death, he had not slept for a day and a half. , coupled with the previous high degree of harassment by family members and high-intensity live broadcasts.
eventually leads to death.
can be judged in the first instance, and the 1 million compensation claimed by Luo Youyou's parents has been recognized. The whole process, the responsibility lies with the company, and Luo Youyou's parents have no responsibility.
Many people focus on the company's exploitation and performance, but they forget that Luo Youyou's exploitation is not just the company, but the most important thing is her parents' 200,000 yuan, which is also a major factor in her death (before she committed suicide by swallowing sleeping pills) evidence of).
is very puzzled here. For Luo Youyou's death, the parents don't say half of the responsibility, and they also have a certain amount of responsibility, but in the end, the fault lies entirely in the company. Is it reasonable?
2. Colleagues are suspected of perjury
Peng Peng testified in court before and after he did not get along. It can be seen from the plot that Peng Peng was asked to speak before testifying in court, and many things were arranged in advance.
Then Peng Peng is suspected of perjury, but after the first trial of the case, it seems that there was no explanation for the matter, and then the sentence was pronounced directly. Is there a bug in
, is it reasonable?
Of course we look at it from God's point of view, there are no spoilers in the play, so according to normal circumstances, Peng Peng's testimony is inconsistent, should he be investigated?, is it still possible to count? and many more.
Therefore, so far, Luo Youyou's case is very uncomfortable to watch, and I feel that there are many bugs. The two things that have not been confirmed have not been investigated clearly, and 's legal interpretation has not explained anything, and it is over.
Of course, from the current overall point of view, if this small detail is not carefully grasped, there is actually no big problem, but if there is a problem, there is a problem, there is no way to downplay it, deliberately avoid it, I hope it will be in the second trial later. , can fill these small loopholes.
Aside from these, "Bottom Line" is really dare to shoot, whether it is the Yu Huan case or the Luo Youyou case, they are both very typical cases, one is an event that has been hotly discussed on the Internet for many years, and the other is the hottest topic at the moment. The livelihood of countless anchors, the topic selection is very good.
coupled with the online acting skills of the actors, it can be said to be the king of the opening, a phenomenal work, I hope it can continue to go on like this, and successfully conferred gods!
