Who sued "Nezha"? Is there any truth to the prosecution?

's "Nezha's Devil Boy Comes to the World", which took the image of a bad boy, became the second largest in the mainland box office list after "Wolf Warrior 2". A story is a myth, and the deduced story is also a "myth"-a box office myth.

However, just as the producers were celebrating their merits, counting money, sharing accounts, and planning to spend money, someone told them! On August 22, 2019, China Film Huateng, the official team of the plaintiff "Five-Dimensional Memory", held a press conference to publicly explain Nezha's infringement and released the "Lawyer Statement", but none of the defendants responded positively. The defendant obtained huge profits due to the infringement, but the plaintiff had to bear huge mental pressure and various expenses required for rights protection. Therefore, the plaintiff delivered a piece of complaint to the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, requesting the six defendants to immediately stop the infringement, publish a statement to eliminate the impact, and jointly compensate 50 million yuan in economic losses, and at the same time bear a reasonable cost of 1 million yuan.

​​Afterwards, out of curiosity, many netizens specifically searched for information on "Five-Dimensional Memory". The author also took a look at the crowd, and felt that the two do have similarities, but that plagiarism may be a bit overstatement. At most, there is some consistency in the elements of many ideas. For example, in "Five-Dimensional Memory", the movement of Nazha's head up and the rotating shots of Nezha and Ao Bing are mentioned. If you don't believe me, see for yourself, fairness and comfort!

The plaintiff claimed in the complaint that they enjoyed the script and copyright of the stage play "Five-Dimensional Memory". "Nezha's Devil Child Comes to the World" jointly produced by Yang X as the screenwriter and director and Beijing Guangguang Film Co., Ltd. and other six companies in terms of character design, storyline and production elements, and the plaintiff’s work "Five-Dimensional Memory" There are a lot of similarities and similarities, which violated their right of adaptation, reproduction and distribution.