challenged Charlotte Hornets away. The Milwaukee Bucks once again encountered the "final judgment" from the referee at the end of regular time, and finally lost by 1 point. The record came to 4 wins and 9 losses in the away game. The record was only 1 win and 6 losses, and it rained all night. You know, in the last game against Pistons , the referee gave rookie forward Holland two free throws at the last moment, which almost caused Antetokounmpo 's 59-point scoring show to be reduced to nothing, but good luck could not favor the Milwaukeeans. Twice, three goals aren't going to let the overcooked duck fly away like Holland did.
Originally such a controversial penalty ended with the sound of the final whistle. At most, it became a topic of discussion after dinner. However, the referee had to jump out to make up for the damage after the game, which can be said to be heart-wrenching to kill. The referee on duty, Courtiers Blair, said in an interview that the foul on Antetokounmpo with 7.3 seconds left in the game was based on the foul contact with Antetokounmpo's leg when LaMelo Ball broke through; However, during the post-match review, when the referee team carefully reviewed the video, they discovered that the legs of the two people did not touch at all, and the three balls fell by themselves! Admitting his mistake so openly, the referee looked like a white lotus flower, as if to say, I was wrong, but I just can't change it, so what can you do?
At the same time, Blair also made a classic scapegoat in the last game. He said that if the Bucks still have a chance to challenge, they can challenge successfully. This was also confirmed by the on-site announcer at the Hornets' home court. When the referee blew the whistle, the announcer immediately stated that the Bucks had no timeout. The Bucks coaching staff headed by Old Rivers could only stare and gloat. meaning.
To be fair, although Lao Li and Hamm's on-the-spot command ability is worrying, there have been many "strange scenes" where the two looked at each other and were at a loss this season, but it was only the last few seconds. It is not normal for there to be no challenge opportunities at this time. ? Out of trust in the professional capabilities of the nba referee team, if this unexpected misjudgment had not occurred, would Old Rivers have been questioned again: The challenge opportunity is useless until the end of the game. Should he keep it for the New Year?
So, although the Bucks are now behind bars, which is inseparable from Old Rivers' poor coaching ability, referee Blair emphasized that it is really unfair that the Bucks cannot change the result of the whistle because they have no chance to challenge. Reasonably, this is not the reason for the three referees to be "selectively blind" at the last moment. After all, the chief helmsman Xiao Hua has repeatedly emphasized since the beginning of last season that the final decision-making power on the trend of the game must be returned to the players at the last moment. , after all, no one likes to watch games where referees interfere.
challenged Charlotte Hornets away. The Milwaukee Bucks once again encountered the "final judgment" from the referee at the end of regular time, and finally lost by 1 point. The record came to 4 wins and 9 losses in the away game. The record was only 1 win and 6 losses, and it rained all night. You know, in the last game against Pistons , the referee gave rookie forward Holland two free throws at the last moment, which almost caused Antetokounmpo 's 59-point scoring show to be reduced to nothing, but good luck could not favor the Milwaukeeans. Twice, three goals aren't going to let the overcooked duck fly away like Holland did.
Originally such a controversial penalty ended with the sound of the final whistle. At most, it became a topic of discussion after dinner. However, the referee had to jump out to make up for the damage after the game, which can be said to be heart-wrenching to kill. The referee on duty, Courtiers Blair, said in an interview that the foul on Antetokounmpo with 7.3 seconds left in the game was based on the foul contact with Antetokounmpo's leg when LaMelo Ball broke through; However, during the post-match review, when the referee team carefully reviewed the video, they discovered that the legs of the two people did not touch at all, and the three balls fell by themselves! Admitting his mistake so openly, the referee looked like a white lotus flower, as if to say, I was wrong, but I just can't change it, so what can you do?
At the same time, Blair also made a classic scapegoat in the last game. He said that if the Bucks still have a chance to challenge, they can challenge successfully. This was also confirmed by the on-site announcer at the Hornets' home court. When the referee blew the whistle, the announcer immediately stated that the Bucks had no timeout. The Bucks coaching staff headed by Old Rivers could only stare and gloat. meaning.
To be fair, although Lao Li and Hamm's on-the-spot command ability is worrying, there have been many "strange scenes" where the two looked at each other and were at a loss this season, but it was only the last few seconds. It is not normal for there to be no challenge opportunities at this time. ? Out of trust in the professional capabilities of the nba referee team, if this unexpected misjudgment had not occurred, would Old Rivers have been questioned again: The challenge opportunity is useless until the end of the game. Should he keep it for the New Year?
So, although the Bucks are now behind bars, which is inseparable from Old Rivers' poor coaching ability, referee Blair emphasized that it is really unfair that the Bucks cannot change the result of the whistle because they have no chance to challenge. Reasonably, this is not the reason for the three referees to be "selectively blind" at the last moment. After all, the chief helmsman Xiao Hua has repeatedly emphasized since the beginning of last season that the final decision-making power on the trend of the game must be returned to the players at the last moment. , after all, no one likes to watch games where referees interfere.
Giannis Antetokounmpo is really worried. He was almost smoking in the last game. He almost scored his first 60 points of the season and almost lost. This game he handed over a triple-double of 22 points, 15 rebounds and 12 assists. , his personal efficiency is already at full capacity, but it is difficult to win - the referee's repeated targeting, it is difficult to say that it is not intentional. Is this a frenzied attempt to make up for the damage and force him to leave the Big Cream City? As we all know, once the box of human desire is opened, it is difficult to go back. The outside world has long speculated that the Greek monster has the idea of leaving. With external forces adding fuel to the fire, Giannis will suddenly feel tired at a certain point in time. Then tell the management that you want to leave?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-