According to reports, in order to strengthen food safety management in primary and secondary schools and kindergartens and prevent food safety and canteen management accidents, the Fuzhou Municipal Education Bureau has launched a "director-accompanying meal system", requiring the chief and deputy directors and heads of functional departments of the education bureaus at the city and county levels to, in principle, Go to primary and secondary schools and kindergartens to have meals with you at least once a month. On November 5, the director of the Fuzhou Municipal Education Bureau and his delegation went to Minhou No. 1 Middle School to supervise food safety work and accompany meals at the school.
Principals dining with the principal is a new thing. Before this, what people saw more in the public eye was probably the system of principals accompanying the principals with meals jointly promoted by the Ministry of Education, the National Health Commission and other ministries and commissions. In April 2019, multiple departments jointly announced the implementation of the "School Food Safety, Nutrition and Health Management Regulations", which proposed that a centralized meal accompanying system should be established. Not only does it require the relevant person in charge of the school to eat with the students at each meal, but it also requires "doing... Keep good meal records, and promptly discover and solve problems existing in the centralized dining process." For this reason, when campus food safety incidents occur in recent years, there is no shortage of public opinion asking "whether the principal's meal companionship system is implemented in practice."
In addition to the principal's meal companionship system, the director also came to accompany the meal. However, it should be noted that based on the differences in the professional division of labor between the two meal companions, the initial requirements for the meal companion system are different. The school food safety implements the principal's responsibility system. In addition, the principal's work scene and the areas he is responsible for are relatively fixed, so that every day of the school leader's It is not only possible to have a meal together, but also mandatory requirements such as "should" are adopted in the legislative language. Relatively speaking, there are many schools under the jurisdiction of the Education Bureau, so the institutional significance of the director's meal may be different from the former's normal supervision, but more of a kind of "unannounced inspection" of the principal's meal and campus food safety. Administrative supervision.
Before Fuzhou clarified the "director's meal with the director" system, another official activity, also known as "the director's meal with the director", was for the head of the education administration department to "have lunch with the students" after routine inspections of campus food safety work. In this way, the person in charge of the school may “warmly invite the director and his delegation to have a meal together in the cafeteria.”
has clearly established the system and put forward the minimum number of meal companionship requirements in principle. Fuzhou's "Director's Dinner Accompanying System" has been officially launched as an institutionalized administrative supervision. Its attitude of adopting multiple methods for administrative supervision is worthy of recognition. In a work-promoting context in which "leadership attaches great importance to productivity", the occasional statement of the person in charge of the education administration department may play a certain role in improving the food safety level of campuses within the jurisdiction.
But a major premise worth paying attention to is that the director may need to learn from the "four no's and two straights" law enforcement and supervision mechanism that was born out of the national safety production supervision and then promoted in many fields. , no need to accompany the reception, go straight to the grassroots, and go directly to the scene" to accompany the meal, and get the most realistic operating status of the relevant school restaurant. Because there is no need to say hello or accompany, the director can truly achieve the goal of discovering and solving problems when dining with him. He should not be satisfied with having a working meal, taking a bunch of work photos, going through the motions, and creating momentum.
Judging from the current situation, whether it is the clearly institutionalized director's meal companionship or the unstated but de facto "lunch with students", it is the head of the education administration department who visits the school to conduct a special inspection of the campus. A spin-off program and a featurette after food safety. Because it is carried out at the same time as the normal administrative inspection work, it may be operationally difficult to try to implement the "four non-two straights" of the director accompanying the meal. But looking at it from another way, can the director's special supervision of campus food safety itinerary before accompanying the meal also meet the work requirements of "four no-two directs"? Can he be able to better understand the real campus food without notifying in advance and going directly to the scene? safety situation and provide targeted supervision opinions?
The core of the principal’s meal-sharing system is the hope that school leaders will “try it first” and share risks with students to improve campus food safety standards.Objectively speaking, the Director of the Education Bureau cannot accompany him for meals every day. The value of his administrative supervision needs to be as efficient as possible and give full play to a function similar to a "flying inspection", forming the idea that "the Director does not accompany us for meals every day, but the Director may “Always there” regulatory deterrence.
urges campus food safety, and the institutionalized daily meals with the principal must be implemented, and problems cannot be brought up for questioning only after they arise. As for the administrative supervision of director-general meals, it is necessary to explore the operating mechanism that can truly realize the effectiveness of meal companions, so that schools are not prepared for meal companions, and each school cafeteria can always ensure that students have meals according to the standard of "director-general meal companions" Safety.
The director’s company is not a treat. The intention of the administrative supervision should be reflected in the meal, but also outside the meal.
According to reports, in order to strengthen food safety management in primary and secondary schools and kindergartens and prevent food safety and canteen management accidents, the Fuzhou Municipal Education Bureau has launched a "director-accompanying meal system", requiring the chief and deputy directors and heads of functional departments of the education bureaus at the city and county levels to, in principle, Go to primary and secondary schools and kindergartens to have meals with you at least once a month. On November 5, the director of the Fuzhou Municipal Education Bureau and his delegation went to Minhou No. 1 Middle School to supervise food safety work and accompany meals at the school.
Principals dining with the principal is a new thing. Before this, what people saw more in the public eye was probably the system of principals accompanying the principals with meals jointly promoted by the Ministry of Education, the National Health Commission and other ministries and commissions. In April 2019, multiple departments jointly announced the implementation of the "School Food Safety, Nutrition and Health Management Regulations", which proposed that a centralized meal accompanying system should be established. Not only does it require the relevant person in charge of the school to eat with the students at each meal, but it also requires "doing... Keep good meal records, and promptly discover and solve problems existing in the centralized dining process." For this reason, when campus food safety incidents occur in recent years, there is no shortage of public opinion asking "whether the principal's meal companionship system is implemented in practice."
In addition to the principal's meal companionship system, the director also came to accompany the meal. However, it should be noted that based on the differences in the professional division of labor between the two meal companions, the initial requirements for the meal companion system are different. The school food safety implements the principal's responsibility system. In addition, the principal's work scene and the areas he is responsible for are relatively fixed, so that every day of the school leader's It is not only possible to have a meal together, but also mandatory requirements such as "should" are adopted in the legislative language. Relatively speaking, there are many schools under the jurisdiction of the Education Bureau, so the institutional significance of the director's meal may be different from the former's normal supervision, but more of a kind of "unannounced inspection" of the principal's meal and campus food safety. Administrative supervision.
Before Fuzhou clarified the "director's meal with the director" system, another official activity, also known as "the director's meal with the director", was for the head of the education administration department to "have lunch with the students" after routine inspections of campus food safety work. In this way, the person in charge of the school may “warmly invite the director and his delegation to have a meal together in the cafeteria.”
has clearly established the system and put forward the minimum number of meal companionship requirements in principle. Fuzhou's "Director's Dinner Accompanying System" has been officially launched as an institutionalized administrative supervision. Its attitude of adopting multiple methods for administrative supervision is worthy of recognition. In a work-promoting context in which "leadership attaches great importance to productivity", the occasional statement of the person in charge of the education administration department may play a certain role in improving the food safety level of campuses within the jurisdiction.
But a major premise worth paying attention to is that the director may need to learn from the "four no's and two straights" law enforcement and supervision mechanism that was born out of the national safety production supervision and then promoted in many fields. , no need to accompany the reception, go straight to the grassroots, and go directly to the scene" to accompany the meal, and get the most realistic operating status of the relevant school restaurant. Because there is no need to say hello or accompany, the director can truly achieve the goal of discovering and solving problems when dining with him. He should not be satisfied with having a working meal, taking a bunch of work photos, going through the motions, and creating momentum.
Judging from the current situation, whether it is the clearly institutionalized director's meal companionship or the unstated but de facto "lunch with students", it is the head of the education administration department who visits the school to conduct a special inspection of the campus. A spin-off program and a featurette after food safety. Because it is carried out at the same time as the normal administrative inspection work, it may be operationally difficult to try to implement the "four non-two straights" of the director accompanying the meal. But looking at it from another way, can the director's special supervision of campus food safety itinerary before accompanying the meal also meet the work requirements of "four no-two directs"? Can he be able to better understand the real campus food without notifying in advance and going directly to the scene? safety situation and provide targeted supervision opinions?
The core of the principal’s meal-sharing system is the hope that school leaders will “try it first” and share risks with students to improve campus food safety standards.Objectively speaking, the Director of the Education Bureau cannot accompany him for meals every day. The value of his administrative supervision needs to be as efficient as possible and give full play to a function similar to a "flying inspection", forming the idea that "the Director does not accompany us for meals every day, but the Director may “Always there” regulatory deterrence.
urges campus food safety, and the institutionalized daily meals with the principal must be implemented, and problems cannot be brought up for questioning only after they arise. As for the administrative supervision of director-general meals, it is necessary to explore the operating mechanism that can truly realize the effectiveness of meal companions, so that schools are not prepared for meal companions, and each school cafeteria can always ensure that students have meals according to the standard of "director-general meal companions" Safety.
The director’s company is not a treat. The intention of the administrative supervision should be reflected in the meal, but also outside the meal.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-