In Fengtai District, residents of the bungalow area of ​​Dong'an Street Community in Wulitian Street and the bungalow area of ​​Nankaixili Community in Kandan Street share the same "neighbor" - the Beijing-Guangzhou Railway. Most of these two bungalows were built in the 1950s. Be

In Fengtai District, residents of the bungalow area of ​​Dong'an Street Community in Wulitian Street and the bungalow area of ​​Nankaixili Community in Kandan Street share the same "neighbor" - the Beijing-Guangzhou Railway Line.

Most of these two bungalows were built in the 1950s. Because they are close to this busy railway, the residents' lives have long been disturbed by noise and vibration - "about one and a half to two meters is the railway", "the train Once it passes, it will be so cool." In addition, due to the age of construction, this area of ​​bungalows still has problems such as aging water pipes and gas blockage. Some houses even have structural safety hazards. Therefore, it is urgent to eliminate dangers and solve problems and completely improve the living environment of residents. This year, both bungalow areas have been included in the Qiaonan Urban Village Renovation Project in Fengtai District. The opportunity to relocate is imminent, but some residents have not yet signed the contract. "Step Forward" builds a communication platform to find out whether the residents Can residents understand the original intention of this urban village reconstruction policy with their true inner thoughts?

Thoughts: It’s not that I don’t want to move

“Our water is brought from the well outside here” “The glass at home needs to be replaced several times a year, and most of them are shattered” “Trains pass by all year round, and the foundation sinks”, When talking about the feeling of living in an old house next to the Beijing-Guangzhou railway line, the resident said, "I would not live here if I could have another place to live." During the preliminary research and interviews, the residents living in the bungalows in the Dong'an Street community of Wulitian Street told us that this place was already a "demolition leftover" place. Before this urban village transformation, there had been two relocations here. , faced with this third and final opportunity to relocate and improve their living conditions, why are there still residents hesitant to move forward? What worries and concerns do they have? At the same time, what problems are faced by the residents of Nankaixili Community in Kandan Street that prevent them from signing the contract?

concerns: What are the resettlement policy standards?

As soon as the recording began, residents raised a series of questions about the urban village reconstruction policy. What department formulated the policy? Why are placement factors different? Are resettlement houses determined based on population or area?

Ms. Liu from Nankai Xili Community in Kandan Street lives in a small public house. "The area listed on our family certificate is only 15.5 square meters. It was not enough for us, so we built a place for bathing and cooking. This self-built The area is what we need for life, can it be included? "So how does the urban village reconstruction policy determine the self-built area? At the program site, the staff of the Urban Village Renovation Project Department explained the policy content in detail and helped the resident representatives present to settle accounts one by one. Can the concerns and doubts of the residents be dispelled?

debates : Can requirements be met?

Grandma Kang, who is 88 years old this year, lives in a bungalow renovated from a factory leased to her by her employer in 1984, with a certified area of ​​31.48 square meters. After detailed calculations by the on-site staff, according to the policy, if she signs the contract during the incentive period, the resettlement area she can get is 105 square meters, which is exactly a three-bedroom apartment, and 730,000 currency. However, Grandma Kang said that she did not have a place to live by herself and wanted a two-bedroom apartment. What was the reason for this?

At the program site, when the demands of the resident representatives could not be met, they even left the scene angrily and communication was interrupted. So, faced with this rare relocation opportunity to completely improve their living environment, can the residents continue to communicate and open up their minds?

The transformation of urban villages is an indispensable step in the development of very large cities. It is not only a physical space innovation for the living environment, but also a leap forward for residents’ quality of life. So this 7-hour communication can Can it help residents take a step forward and move towards a new life of peace and security? Please stay tuned for "One Step Forward" aired at 21:02 this Sunday night.