The "Singer" breakout competition has attracted a lot of attention, with hot searches coming one after another.
The audience also wants to see who can make it to the finals.
is this format, and it is too deliberate.
is not tailor-made for singers. It is purely to make the audience feel uncomfortable.
In the past "Singer" breakout competition, everyone took turns to perform, and the participating singers had to stand out from a group of people.
"Singer 2024" was actually changed to 1v1. Instead of breaking out, it was obviously a duel.
When I meet a singer like Tan Weiwei and Yuan Yawei that I like both, I have no choice but to give up one. This is what the
program team wants.
01
1v1 The result of the challenge is that Sun Nan, Tan Weiwei, and Hai Lai Amu entered the finals.
Some netizens said that Huang Xuan competed for Hailai Amu for two months, and then left calmly after sending Hailai Amu to the finals.
Some people also say that Adam came in vain.
Huang Xuan’s elimination has set off a topic called # singers’ aesthetic regression on the Internet.
Under this topic, you can see many enthusiastic music bloggers.
They looked for opinions from all angles, proving that eliminating Huang Xuan was a loss for the audience and a setback for the music industry.
Hai Lai Amu entered the finals with "The First Son". They said: "They are really Chinese people who have been empathizing with each other all their lives."
No, watching "Singer" will give you a group of music bloggers a sense of superiority?
It’s an analysis of the arrangement and an analysis of the singing skills. You are so awesome, why don’t you be a judge on the spot.
Isn’t this just like when I was in school, people who listened to English songs looked down on those who listened to Chinese songs.
People who listen to rock music look down on pop music.
If you win, it’s because you have great arrangement and singing skills. If you lose, it’s because the judges don’t understand aesthetics.
I have finished talking to you people.
"Singer" is a competitive program. If you want to play music, don't care about ranking, don't care about winning or losing.
To the general public, it doesn’t matter how unique or gorgeous the arrangement is, what matters is whether it sounds good or not.
No matter how music critics advocate the arrangement, if the audience cannot appreciate it, then there is something wrong.
didn’t think about how to please the audience, but he actually asked the audience to come and post it, which is really contrary to Tiangang.
eliminated a few singers and made you music critics rise to the level of aesthetic regression.
If you are so reluctant to part with him, why don't you pool your money to put on a show for them?
03
The little lucky star followed every episode of "Singer" in the past, but lost interest this season.
In Little Lucky’s opinion, Hong Xiao’s energy was in the wrong place and he lost the purest thing about music.
I used to watch "Singer". Those who sang on stage enjoyed it, and those who listened to it in the audience were intoxicated. After the
program was broadcast, there were always a few songs that attracted widespread attention and were sung in large numbers.
But this rarely happens in "Singer 2024".
The audience's attention is focused on whether the live broadcast has overturned, what is the competition format, and who will be the guest in the next episode.
In order to prove themselves, singers break through their comfort zones in various ways, either to show off their singing skills or to show off their arrangements. The program
is so popular that it can’t even produce a few widely sung masterpieces.
The "Voice of Heaven" that is played next door does not have the gimmick of a live broadcast and does not have that much traffic.
But every episode of the program has a hit song that is widely circulated on the Internet.
"Divorce in the Republic of Ghana", "It's better to go home and have running water", "Virtual", "Know"...
Don't talk about it. The program team of "Singer" does not allow you to choose songs at will.
"Singer" is a live broadcast, and there is no editing on site.
These are all excuses. They only care about their spelling skills, and there are only a few people who can care about their feelings.
04
In Little Lucky Star’s opinion, Hong Xiao was simply too eager and wanted to prove himself too much.
"Singer" was extremely brilliant in the hands of Hong Tao, and it was still talked about by the audience even if it was stopped.
As Hong Tao’s apprentice, Hong Xiao took over the reboot of “Singer” and naturally wanted to do something big.
Otherwise they would not take the risk of choosing live broadcast as the carrier.
The form of "live broadcast" has indeed made "Singer" receive widespread attention and a lot of discussion.
But after the heated discussion passed, what did "Singer" leave to the audience?
left the word "live broadcast".
Since the program is for the general public, please put the general public at the core.
Don’t act like you rely on ordinary people for a living, but look down on ordinary people for their lack of aesthetics.
Ordinary people must have extremely high music appreciation ability. Why not watch "Singer"? Why not just go to the concert.
I don’t know why in the past few years, there are always problems, and I attribute the mistakes to ordinary people.
It’s like ordinary people forcing them to do shows.
If "Singer" is not restarted, will the audience be the loser?
I don’t understand this at all. What kind of variety show or music critic is it? It’s not as objective as Ding Taisheng.
(Picture source | "Singer", infringement may be deleted)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-