After Trump was assassinated, he appeared with a white bandage wrapped around his ears and became an official presidential candidate. Whether his policy towards China will change after being elected has attracted attention from the outside world. The shooting incident of for

After Trump was assassinated, he appeared with a white bandage wrapped around his ears and became an official presidential candidate. Whether his policy towards China will change after being elected has attracted attention from the outside world.

The shooting incident of former US President Trump at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania not only shocked the United States, but also attracted widespread attention from the international community.

Observer.com reported that at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Trump ignored the previous day Despite being shot, he still showed up and was declared the Republican candidate for president.

Judging from the state of the scene, he was in high spirits, with a bandage on his ear. When he entered the venue, he received greetings and care from many attendees. When asked about the "assassination attempt", he also optimistically said that happened to be at the moment when the gunman opened fire, and he turned to look at the teleprompter. This angle was so perfect and amazing, but don't turn around. At one point, a bullet could hit the brain or skull.

Trump also said that after experiencing this incident, he planned to change the content of his speech. He hoped to focus more on "American unity."

After these remarks, Trump undoubtedly received more support.

Of course, this incident also prompted the US government to rethink how to ensure the safety of such important figures. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced that it will vigorously strengthen security measures for former President Trump, current President Biden, and other officials. At the same time, it also emphasized that it will continue to investigate the above-mentioned shooting cases.

Recently, new details have been released.

According to reports, the gunman was hiding about 130 meters away from Trump’s speech area when the shooting occurred. This distance is so close that it is shocking , which shows how serious the loopholes in the US security system are.

What’s even more incredible is that at that time, the U.S. Secret Service’s counter-sniper team had been deployed from the commanding heights of the rooftop opposite. Under such conditions, the counter-sniper team failed to detect and stop the gunman in time, which is difficult for the outside world to understand.

Not only that, after the gunman opened fire, the U.S. Secret Service counter-sniper team did not leave the gunman alive for further investigation, but then fired continuously and killed him directly.

As a result, many people have started "conspiracy theories", speculating that this incident seems to be more like the result of internal and external collusion.

Regarding the above phenomenon, the FBI asked three questions in a row:

Why did no one check the surrounding environment in advance?

Why is it that even a sniper team has been deployed, but there is no control over the commanding heights opposite Trump?

Why would a gunman shoot at such a close distance?

After that, the FBI disclosed other details, such as There were a total of 9 gunshots at the scene, but after checking the gunman's pistol, it was found that only 8 bullets were used , killing 1 person and 2 others. Injuried.So, a new question arises: Who fired the last gunshot?

It can be said that these questions all point to the same object: As the world's top security unit, how could the US Secret Service make such a rudimentary mistake? ? In this way, based on these questions, the FBI turned its suspicious eyes to the Secret Service personnel on the scene,

However, the specific reason requires further investigation.

Regarding this matter, a reporter asked White House spokesman Pierre:

At the recently concluded NATO summit, US President Biden demonstrated the undisputed global leadership of the United States and emphasized the unity of the transatlantic alliance and the common confrontation. The determination to threaten. However, did the subsequent assassinations raise questions about the durability of this leadership and damage the image of the United States on the international stage?

White House spokesman Pierre reiterated President Biden’s position that the most urgent task now is to promote unity within the country. During this period, Pierre also directly quoted Biden: "The political temperature needs to be lowered and the country needs to be united."

Of course, whether it is Biden or Trump, compared with the excitement and anger of Americans, there are still a considerable number of people who will Attention is focused on foreign policies, such as toward Russia and China. Will there be changes due to changes in leaders?

It is worth noting that not only under Biden’s leadership, but also during Trump’s term, their foreign policies, especially their strategies towards Russia and China, have always maintained a high degree of consistency.

Especially for China, Trump has made it clear that he will impose tariffs of up to 60% on products made in China. This move undoubtedly shows that the United States still regards China as its main competitor in economic development. Therefore, we should still be prepared for it.