"Little Wish" has not been released smoothly from the beginning. I feel that this movie has been successfully released. Thank goodness. Not to mention the performance of the three actors. For now, the director has pulled down a lot of people. Thoughts on this movie. After all, he can tell the actor: "Do you think you are making money while lying down? Is it so easy?"
now has a Douban score of 5.2 in "Little Wish", and there is a downward trend, but the box office has exceeded 100 million. , What is it that makes this vigorous pre-release film have such a bad reputation after it is released? The film crew’s "sorry operations" so far include: "Broken contracts, scams, forcibly cut scenes, suppressed..." Putting aside the storms that occurred before the movie was released, returning to the movie itself, this is still not a good movie director. The screenwriter has a back-to-back
. Everyone knows that the movie was adapted from the Korean version of the Korean movie "Great Wish". It was released in 2016. The reputation has always been very good. It has a score of 8.1 on Korean Internet and a score of 7.4 on Douban. It can be said that I watched a "copy and paste" movie
. The first thing I want to say is that Peng Yuchang’s acting skills are the highlights and highlights of the whole movie. Due to the character setting, he can’t use too much body movements. To express emotions, but only relying on facial expressions to achieve such a good performance, undoubtedly gave many audiences a surprise. Whether it is the monologue line skills or the expression of eyes, they are all professional. The director should really thank Peng. Yu Chang. In terms of the plot of
, I don’t know why the file was withdrawn in advance. If it is for the quality of the film, it is really unnecessary. Now the film is released like water, and the things that should be deep are not deep, in order to praise a certain man. First, movies are also racking their brains.
In terms of laughter, Wei Daxun is a great contractor. After all, he is a man with his own laughter. Just said that the movie is the same as the Korean version, but it is just a plot. Some details have been adjusted to "consistent with national conditions". If you have seen the Korean version, you should know what "Little Wish" talks about the male protagonist's illness. In the Korean version, the biggest wish is to "break the place". In fact, "Little Wish" was shot like this at the beginning ( It can be seen from the first preview), but because of some force majeure, what everyone sees after the release is that the male protagonist’s greatest wish is to fall in love.
From the father’s father asking him "what's your wish?" to the father’s mother looking for a basketball player for him, these plots are exactly the same as the Korean version, plus the father’s father pushing the male lead to participate in long-distance running competitions, here are the shots It's exactly the same.
Even after his father fainted due to exhaustion, the male protagonist followed the wheelchair and rolled down the hill. The reporter said in the camera, "Is it moral decay or the annihilation of humanity". These words are also the same. The only adaptation
should be three Individuals sneaked to the beach. They met a traffic policeman on the way, and the traffic police made a stop gesture. They misunderstood and gave a high-five to the traffic police. Later, they secretly told the traffic police that the traffic police was moved to tears. (The presentation is also a comedy Hua) to help them get to the beach, which is one of the few adaptations compared to the Korean version. The twists and turns of
three people's experience is really touching, but too "positive energy" makes people feel a bit "fake". What's more regrettable is that "Little Wish" also continues the shortcomings of the Korean version, such as a loose rhythm in the middle. Some plots can be deleted and adapted, but the movie does not. It is just focusing on sensation and making tears, especially the movie continues to stigmatize “sex”. In fact, people with physical disabilities can also have physical needs, which should not be It is a shameful and taboo topic.
In fact, in Taiwan, there is a charity organization called "Hand Angels". Their service group is severely disabled people. All the volunteers in the organization are "sex volunteers". Their usual job is to provide " service".
Earlier, "Hand Angels" had such organizations in Europe and America, and Japan also had "White Gloves" groups to provide "services" for people with disabilities. In the Netherlands, the National Medical System provided publicly funded "services" to disabled people for one year. There are 12 times. In Taiwan, people with disabilities can apply for the "hand angel" service three times in their lifetime. People with disabilities are often misunderstood as people with no needs. In fact, they are also normal people, but they can’t move because of physical reasons. Although there are still many people who don’t understand such organizations, those volunteers are never afraid of the world.From my perspective, everyone is usually an ordinary office worker, but no one knows that they also have a volunteer who is a "hand angel".
In fact, the film can explore the needs of persons with disabilities from this perspective, rather than blindly imitating, blindly explaining how shameful this matter is. Although the original film mainly talks about family and friendship, but in "Little Wish In ", so many of Peng Yuchang's scenes have been deleted, and I really don't see what "friendship" is.
I don’t understand why the so-called “capital” has to do this. A good movie is tossed like this. I want to come to Peng Yuchang, an excellent young actor with a roots, who can terminate the contract with the film before the movie is released. It was too bad to be forced. It can only be said that the word-of-mouth of this movie is not wronged. It is Peng Yuchang, Wei Daxun, and the cast and crew who really worked hard for this movie. In general, if this film has a perfect score of 10, I will give it 5 points. The theme of this film could have been better. The actors are great, but the director’s attitude is problematic. For various reasons, I will leave regrets, just like the protagonist. Like Gao Yuan, he originally had countless possibilities, but he could only get here.
If you want to go to the cinema to relax and have fun, you can rest assured to watch. This is my opinion as an ordinary audience. Don't bully young people poor
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-