Why did the incident on the 26th only become a hot topic on the 28th? Maybe God can’t stand it anymore. On April 26, a Wenjie M7 rear-ended a road maintenance vehicle on the express lane. The front of the Wenjie M7 caught fire, and then the entire vehicle was enveloped in flames.

Why did the matter of

26 only become a hot search on the 28th?

may be something that even God can’t stand anymore.

html On April 26, a Wenjie M7 rear-ended a road maintenance vehicle on the express lane, and then the front of the Wenjie M7 caught fire, and then the entire car was enveloped in flames.

Later, the family of the person involved in the accident spoke out:

At around 3 noon on April 26, his brother was driving a Wenjie car at high speed in the Xia County section of Shanxi Province and rear-ended a high-speed watering truck. His husband and 2-year-old son were sitting in the car. . After

rear-ended, the vehicle exploded, and his brother, husband and son were unfortunately killed. Among them, his brother and son died directly in the fire inside the car.

According to family members, the vehicle his brother drove was a six-seat rear-wheel drive smart driving version of a new M7 Max purchased in January this year.

Many people once wrote the Tesla website:

"It's better to buy a Tesla. If something goes wrong, the whole network can help you protect your rights."

So what about the question? After the incident of

, the hot search was quickly removed, and the relevant online discussion group about a certain activist who was defending rights was blocked for a time.

Until the 28th, the families of the victims spoke out again. Their anger broke through the cover-up of some power and began to be known to the public.

But in the end, it quickly disappeared from the hot search list...

Can you believe it? When a consumer faces an accident and wants to get the truth for her loved ones, what she gets is a small amount of sympathy and understanding, and more, It is a denunciation of her:

said that she was being used.

said she should not slander someone before she understands the situation.

What's more, it is said that Chinese companies are not easy. The sacrifices of these three people are for a certain company to better go to the world.

What else can I say?

Patriotism means loving the people of this country first.

He doesn’t even love people, yet he keeps talking to the world. It’s extremely ridiculous.

First of all, in my heart, something is not the same as a symbol of Chinese enterprises.

Secondly, I am very disgusted with the marketing of companies and patriotism. The products produced by

enterprises are based on quality.

Why do some companies boast of aeb and gaeb but don’t automatically brake when encountering an emergency? Didn’t the initial online safety test generate several rounds of hot searches?

Why do you say your car is safe, but at critical moments, you always see it catching fire?

Why can’t the door be opened?

In response to this accident, the public relations response of some car companies was to cover their mouths first.

couldn’t hold it back and came out with a “response”: We are deeply saddened and express our deepest condolences to the victims...

and especially emphasized:

“It was learned that the vehicle was traveling at a speed of 115km/h when the accident occurred, the airbags were deployed normally, and the power battery The package features are all normal. "

Why don't you talk about the key issue of car door unlocking?

Regarding vehicle safety issues, people in the industry have actually expressed their opinions for a long time.

Wenjie m7 is actually a product that is reversely developed based on the old architecture of Cyrus. It is not very safe and is usually used in cars priced at 100,000 yuan. After being empowered with intelligence, the price was raised to the level of 20,000 to 300,000 yuan, which is not commensurate with its safety.

However, many questions have long been drowned in the face of the overwhelming "far ahead".

What flows in Chinese enterprises should be moral blood, not patriotic chicken blood or big chess deception.

A certain company’s independent research and development and investment in scientific research have indeed made achievements.

But this does not mean that it can represent the country.

"If a certain person fails, the country's technology will perish."

"Only one company in the entire country dares to compete with the United States."

"Those who hate a certain company are the lackeys of foreigners."

I don't know who invented these words, but they have been used repeatedly in the past few years. See.

Isn’t it unpatriotic to not buy a certain company’s products?

Is questioning the safety of a company's products slandering the company's reputation and damaging the business environment?

I think these cannot be equal.

There are still many excellent companies in China, many of which are working hard quietly to specialize in new technologies. In fact, they are leading to a certain extent, but they do not market themselves in this way.

Also, we engage in domestic substitution in order to not be controlled by others and to give back to consumers.

Instead of promoting the idea of ​​leaving a backdoor in the neck, fattening one family and thinning the world, treating consumption as fools, and leaving the costs to hundreds of millions of people.

For some companies, you cannot go too far in “protecting” them!

lets the market return to the market and allows enterprises to grow in the test of the market.

Don’t plant seedlings by planting trees with your ears covered!

-End -

Passionate likes, passionate attention, affectionate star