Jimu News commentator Qu Jing
On the evening of April 14, during the interactive session of Xue Zhiqian's Chongqing concert, a female audience member who appeared on the big screen was asked how many people came, and she answered "one person", which attracted a lot of attention. A man wearing glasses next to him was dissatisfied. Then the man started a live broadcast to receive gifts. The maximum number of people online was 100,000+. The girl was also a blogger with more than 200,000 fans. The incident was questioned as a staged incident similar to "losing winter vacation homework in Paris" to attract traffic. On April 15, the man made a video to respond to the doubts, but did not explain whether he was planning a hype. (According to upstream news on April 17)
The female audience member at Joker Xue Zhiqian’s Chongqing concert said “I came alone” while interacting, and the boy next to her looked stunned (screenshot of online video)
“Brother Glasses” became famous overnight because of his extreme Dadi satisfied the curiosity and desire for gossip of "melon-eating netizens" and accompanied his female companion to a concert, but was wiped out by the girl without hesitation in public. In the eyes of netizens, the girl's expression of " "A person's" finger simply poked into "Brother Glasses"'s spine. The "glasses guy" went from full of expectations to disbelief, then to very angry, and finally to despair. The "emoticon" was in sharp contrast with the bright and shy smile of the girl next to him, which made many netizens express their sympathy: "In Being kicked out in front of tens of thousands of people, I really lost everything in the end.”
However, the majority of netizens still lamented sincerely, “She who should cooperate with you in the performance turned a blind eye.” They also revealed various details of the scene to analyze and speculate, All kinds of doubts about the incident have emerged, and the male and female protagonists may be "actors." The male protagonist "Brother Glasses" immediately started a live broadcast after watching the concert. He received many gifts from netizens and his fans increased from hundreds to more than 30,000. The "sentimental pain" that fell from the sky was exchanged for the overwhelming love. of wealth. At the same time, the heroine's account was also revealed. She is a famous Internet blogger. After this incident, her number of followers increased by more than 60,000, but all her previous works were deleted.
The male protagonist of the incident, "Brother Glasses", started a live broadcast to receive gifts that night (screenshot from the Internet)
As the incident further developed, "Brother Glasses" posted another video saying that the female protagonist in the incident was his ex-girlfriend and that the schedule had been arranged before , the fee is AA, I felt very uncomfortable when I heard the girl’s answer, and the girl’s answer was because of work, and she also called on netizens to “eat melons rationally”. In a few words, the plot was perfectly rounded out, and he found enough reasons for himself and the other party, and then dumped the blame for "causing controversy" on netizens, but did not mention the authenticity of the incident at all. This is either because it was really "too much of a coincidence." , or the way of playing online is "too clever".
"Brother Glasses" later posted a video to explain the matter (screenshot from the Internet)
At this point in the story, does it feel familiar? Planning hype, creating hot spots, and bringing your own script, will the next step be "I'm sorry for occupying public resources"? Some people may think that this kind of incident has nothing to do with the public interest, but it is just concocting some emotional gossip. Even if it is false, it seems to be okay if everyone just looks at it and has fun. But if Internet celebrity bloggers rely on this kind of planning and hype to make a lot of money, what kind of values are conveyed? Can you make a fortune by lying in public and trying to please others? Can you get a "golden rice bowl" by fabricating hot topics and inciting emotions? This is obviously contrary to the mainstream values of society and will certainly not be accepted by the public.
Just a few days ago, an internet celebrity with tens of millions of fans concocted the "Qin Lang lost his winter vacation homework in Paris" incident. He publicly apologized for causing bad influence on society, was punished by the police, and banned from the entire network. The lesson should be profound and vivid, and netizens cannot Being deceived again and again, the sympathy and trust of society cannot withstand the hype and consumption of "drama queens" again and again. Whether the "Glasses Brother" incident is true or not, you might as well step in and investigate, so as not to let Internet celebrities talk to themselves, and to prevent netizens from becoming a part of the "self-directed and self-acted" farce.
The large-screen interactive part of Xue Zhiqian's concert is very popular, but this is not the first time that it has been involved in controversy for Internet celebrities to use it to make profits.Xue Zhiqian himself once said that the beauties in the interactive session were all chosen by the photographer, and he did not know if the photographer had greeted them in advance.
Whether in real life or on the Internet, if you dare to step on the stage, you may become the center of attention, but what comes with it is not necessarily fame and fortune, but also legal punishment and moral condemnation. Making money through traffic is indeed a shortcut, but integrity and law-abiding are an insurmountable bottom line. At present, regardless of regulation or public opinion, there is "zero tolerance" for rumors and hype. Therefore, celebrities on stage and Internet celebrities off stage should all have their own influence. Be responsible, respect public rules, and never "put away the bottom line" and let the audience watch some "clumsy performances" like Xue Zhiqian sang in the song.
(Source: Jimu News)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-