It is really difficult to tell what is right and wrong in the entertainment industry at once. Just like Wang Xiaofei and Big S, they have been divorced and occupied public resources for a long time. Now Taiwanese media has revealed that Wang Xiaofei forced her to exchange debts f

It’s really hard to tell what is right and what is wrong in the entertainment industry at once. Just like Wang Xiaofei and Big S, they have been divorced and have been occupying public resources for a long time. Now Taiwanese media has revealed that Wang Xiaofei forced her to exchange debts for guarantees. Threatening Big S not to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in loans, what is going on?

s mother's lease protector

You must know that after eldest son and Wang Xiaofei got married, s mother saw that Wang Xiaofei wanted to start a business, so she lent hundreds of millions of Taiwan dollars, and she also served as the lease guarantor.

As the epidemic happened to catch up with the epidemic in those years, the tourism industry experienced a bleak situation. S’s mother often received letters stating that the rent was not paid. The elderly were worried and asked Wang Xiaofei to go through the replacement procedures many times, but Wang Xiaofei always ignored her. And passed.

Someone once questioned why S’s mother didn’t file a lawsuit to protect her rights? Faced with such doubts, S's mother said that I don't agree with filing a lawsuit to ask for money. Everyone is human. In his conscience, I don’t want to be in litigation all the time in my life.

s’s mother kept saying that Wang Xiaofei owed Big S hundreds of millions of dollars in debt, and she was still the guarantor of the lease. I don't want to resolve this matter through litigation, and hope that Wang Xiaofei will act with conscience.

But now, Taiwanese media reported that Wang Xiaofei made it clear that if she wants to replace S's mother as the guarantor, the condition is that S cannot pursue hundreds of millions of debts and exchange the debt for guarantee.

So, why did Wang Xiaofei do this?

Taiwanese media have always been biased towards Big S. Especially when Big S published long essays exposing information about Wang Xiaofei’s domestic violence and cheating, the Taiwanese media reported that it was not too big a deal to watch the excitement and favored Big S. .

Since Wang Xiaofei didn't have many assets in Taiwan, and S's mother didn't want to litigate, when he saw this problem, he wanted to exchange the debt for a guarantee, so as not to pursue the hundreds of millions of yuan in loans from him.

Wang Xiaofei was forced to "jump over the wall"

Many people did not understand Wang Xiaofei's actions, and even Wang Xiaofei really had a problem, but as everyone knows, Wang Xiaofei also had his own difficulties. What he did was called "jumping over the wall" because after the divorce, It was Big S who violated the confidentiality agreement and brought up the old matter again, which triggered the debt crisis.

And Wang Xiaofei lost control for a while, especially after seeing her child forcibly taken away by the boss, she couldn't see her child being emotional, so she behaved like this.

In this divorce war, the long essay posted by Big S made everyone unanimously sympathize with her. But now that the truth has been revealed, many people have begun to accuse Big S of being a scheming woman. Stop whitewashing her. , if the old matter had not been brought up again, there would not have been this debt-for-guarantee turmoil.

In the eyes of outsiders, Big S has tightly grasped Wang Xiaofei's weakness. As a father, he will put the safety of his children first no matter what, and forcefully take away the children, which will force Wang Xiaofei to jump over the wall and do something. Such an impulsive thing. No matter how deep the grievance between the two people is, no matter how the court decides in the end, they hurt not only each other, but also their children.

I hope that both Da S and Wang Xiaofei can put aside their past feud and let it go. They will stop holding on to past grievances and occupying public resources. After all, family scandals cannot be made public. They should consider the future dignity of their children. After all, no child is I wish my parents were enemies.