Big S and Wang Xiaofei are in trouble again due to the lawsuit, with both sides insisting on their own opinions. At present, the response from Big S to the evidence revealed by Wang Xiaofei seems weak. Especially regarding the accusation of contacting Gu Junye during the marriage, the Big S team refused to discuss it several times, and the key evidence was the logistics order posted by Wang Xiaofei.
It shows that it was sent to South Korea, and the recipient is Gu Junye’s English name. According to the screenshot of the chat, Big S arranged for the driver to come to pick up the package and mail it. The driver also said that he would use this picture to report to Wang Xiaofei's company.
Regarding this accusation, the Big S team did not respond at first, but later simply denied it through Taiwanese media, questioning Wang Xiaofei's logistics order fraud because the sender was the driver, not Big S himself.
You should know that Wang Xiaofei's evidence should have been handed over to the court at the same time, and you can know whether it is a fraud after a quick check. The Big S team used Taiwan media to imply fraud, which can be said to be a bad move.
Maybe this clarification was not strong enough, but the big s broker finally admitted that the logistics order was genuine.
It is reported that Aben, a well-known tattoo artist in Taiwan Province, posted an article saying that he and Gu Junye have known each other for a long time. Gu Junye asked him to buy things. When he went to S's house to help her tattoo, he met Wang Xiaofei's driver, and then asked the driver It's not a gift sent by mail.
What’s great is that Taiwanese media also attached a new statement from Big S’s agent.
said that Big S invited the tattoo artist to her home to help her with tattoos. After a long time, they started chatting. The tattoo artist took the initiative to mention that Gu Junye’s tattoos were also done by him. He planned to send a home tattoo machine to South Korea for Gu Junye to use in the near future. The driver was entrusted by the tattoo artist to pick up the items and mail them to South Korea. The agent also said that the story of the logistics order was so unremarkable, even boring, that even explaining it seemed laborious, but it was maliciously added to the story and turned into an affair, which was very helpless.
took two days to think of how to respond, and this statement was still full of loopholes.
A tattoo artist asked someone else's private driver to mail something, and he still sent address information to the driver. Is it necessary to be so tortuous? Doesn’t the tattoo artist know how to mail it himself? In addition, if the tattoo artist really asked Wang Xiaofei’s driver to mail it, why would the driver report the bill to Wang Xiaofei’s company? Isn’t this a case of reporting false accounts?
Big S’s agent responded like this. Did he really think about it seriously?
If it was just a tattoo artist who asked me to send it by mail, then why did it happen to be the Chinese Valentine's Day? Moreover, after receiving it, Gu Junye immediately tattooed a big zodiac sign with a big "S" on his body, and wrote "Can't give up for the rest of my life". What a coincidence.
The big S team’s rhetoric is becoming more and more perfunctory. If it was so simple at the beginning, why not explain it directly. After the Taiwanese media alluded to the fraud of logistics orders, and public opinion had no effect, I finally thought of how to respond. This new response and explanation of
is just getting darker and darker. And according to the tattoo artist, Big S got a tattoo at home, so what did she get tattooed? Is it the English abbreviation "k" of Gu Junye on the chest?
Nowadays, the operation of the Big S team has not only overturned Weibo, but also in the comment area of Taiwan media news, netizens are angrily criticizing the money spent on public relations to get the media to cooperate.
The contradictory statements are really hard to convince the public. I hope that the Big S team will do less such operations, be more sincere and use evidence to speak for themselves.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-