On the evening of March 11, the TV series "Above the River" premiered in a two-episode set on CCTV. In the first two episodes of the plot, there are at least two major knowledge points that are very tough, but there must be many viewers who don't know. But if you watch this TV se

On the evening of March 11, the TV series " Above the Rivers " premiered in a two-episode set on CCTV. In the first two episodes of the plot, there are at least two major knowledge points that are very tough, but there must be many viewers who don't know. But if you watch this TV series in conjunction with "River Rises", it will definitely make many viewers dizzy. Are "On the River" and "On the River" both realistic? If so, which one of the two is more credible? Watching the two dramas together can easily make you dizzy.

Let me first talk about two very hard knowledge points in the first two episodes of "Above the River". First, it turns out that when a judge is hearing a case in court, he can leave the court and "go to the scene" to directly collect evidence. Second, it turns out that our current judges not only judge cases in the court, but can also go to the countryside to realize "mobile courts." I estimate that many drama fans, like me, have only seen the mobile court in the movie "1942".

Because one of the producers of this TV series is the Supreme People's Court Film and Television Center, I believe that these two plots in the TV series "Above the River" are very real. Therefore, I think these two plots are very tough knowledge points in the play. Judges can "go to the scene", and we now also have "mobile courts". Based on this, "Above the River" plays a significant role in popularizing judicial science.

Then I said that watching "On the River" and "On the River", two TV series about environmental protection together, made me feel confused. I think maybe what made me dizzy is also what many viewers couldn’t understand. Please allow me to talk slowly one by one. There must be more professional viewers who can give me enlightening explanations for these things that confuse me.

The first area of ​​confusion is the relationship between the courts and the Environmental Protection Agency. In the TV series "River Rises", the story is told from the perspective of the Environmental Protection Bureau and the deputy mayor in charge of environmental protection. In this play, pollution problems occurred in Nanwa Mountain, and villagers and livestock died. The deputy mayor in charge of environmental protection led the investigation and gave the villagers protection. After the investigation results came out, local villagers went to court to demand compensation from the companies that caused the pollution.

At this time, a plot appeared in "River Rises". The male protagonist Zheng Hanjiang had a meeting with his leader Liao Yuzheng and others. Zheng Hanjiang reported the villagers' lawsuit in court. Liao Yuzheng gave instructions to Zheng Hanjiang and others who were in charge of environmental protection. Draw up a compensation standard and give it to the comrades in the court.

Then, let’s watch the first two episodes of the TV series “Above the River”. The male protagonist played by Gao Weiguang is trying a case when he comes on. In this case, there seems to be someone from the Environmental Protection Bureau in the dock. When the male protagonist was chatting with another old comrade, the old comrade scolded the male protagonist for talking about it, but the male protagonist seemed to be speaking righteously.

After watching "On the River" and "On the River" together, I became confused. What is the relationship between the court and the Environmental Protection Bureau? Of these two TV series, which one is more realistic? Who should I trust?

The second area of ​​confusion is chemical pollution. Who should take legal action?

Similar pollution problems also occurred in the TV series "River Rises". In this TV series, the male protagonist, the deputy mayor in charge of environmental protection, works with the Environmental Protection Bureau to fine these companies. When the victims went to court to file lawsuits, the male protagonist and others drafted some specific compensation standards and then sent them to the court for execution. This drama gives me the feeling that the environmental protection department is the main actor in such incidents and has strong initiative.

In the TV series "Above the River", it is not the environmental protection department that has strong initiative, but the courts, especially outstanding judges like the male protagonist. In the first two episodes, those who came to sue were ordinary people. Moreover, there is another section in the plot that is worth noting. A lawyer said that as an ordinary person, you simply cannot afford to spend hundreds of thousands of yuan in testing fees. This place is very distressing.

is really correct.From the perspective of the court, it is correct that whoever files the lawsuit will spend the testing fees first. However, in this kind of mass pollution incident, do the victims really have to litigate themselves, instead of the environmental protection department and relevant leaders helping them like in "River Rises"? In "River Rises", the male protagonist has a 40-degree fever and sends a poor couple to be treated in Beijing. How come in "Above the River", the victims don't even have anyone to help them with testing?

So, I'm confused. If similar environmental pollution problems arise in reality, what should ordinary people do in this matter? Watching the two dramas together, the more I watch, the less I know what to do.

In addition, in the two episodes currently aired on "Above the River", in addition to professional hard knowledge and some confusing "segment logic", there are also some segments that I think are relatively routine. For example, the heroine played by Chen Shu is lying unconscious in a hospital bed, and her mother holds her hand and starts to stir up emotions. But the next scene that Chen Shu's character appeared in was already on campus, where he began to care about the parents of the dead students and their belongings. The old mother's sensational drama seems unnecessary. The forward and backward push and the backward and forward logical relationship between bridge sections are almost meaningless.

For another example, the character Chen Shu is a professional expert in the field of chemistry. She is very aware of the power of dangerous substances after they explode. So why does she have to run back after the explosion has occurred? The meaning of the plot is that she found out that her male student was not there, and she wanted to rush back to save the college student she brought with her. However, Chen Shu's character should be well aware of the explosive power of chemically dangerous skins. Doesn't she know that if she returns, she will die? Is she challenging her professional knowledge? This happened to the ignorant 250, so it is believable. However, Chen Shu's character is not a 250-year-old, but a professional chemistry expert.

The first two episodes of "Above the River" left me confused and dizzy. Maybe, this is just my personal problem, not the TV series' problem. I am reminded of director Zhang Yimou's rebuttal to some movie fans who said they felt sleepy after watching one of his movies - you are just too sleepy. As a fan of the show, I reflect on myself. (Text/Ma Qingyun)