The Beijing News reported on October 29 that Yi Xianqianxi and Dongyu Zhou starred in the movie "You are a teenager" and the box office went viral, arousing people's attention to youth bullying , "Take care of young people" has become a consensus in the world. But embarrassingly, this seemingly "initial heart" film is full of accusations of plagiarism in the original work.
People accuse many fragments of this movie that are highly similar to Keigo Higashino's "Devotion of Suspect X", and the character setting is almost exactly the same as that of "White Night Walk". The accusations were loud, and given the huge number of readers of Keigo Higashino, this accusation may continue.
"You are a young man" originally from "The Queen of Rongstalker"? The
movie "You are so beautiful" is adapted from the network writer Jiu Yuexi's "You Are So Beautiful". Jiu Yuexi is a controversial figure. Prior to this, she was accused of plagiarism by many online writers, and was even called "The Queen of Rong Geng"-almost every work has been listed as evidence of Rong Geng by netizens.
Jiuyuexi is an author who is active on Jinjiang.com, and most of her works on Jinjiang. Kerong Geng did not affect her high productivity. Several of her works have sold the film and television copyrights and were not punished by the platform involved. Instead, the accuser Ding Mo and others were forced to leave Jinjiang.com. The lack of punishment on the
platform is probably related to the gaps in the law in this respect: to judge plagiarism in law, there must be evidence of the "copy and paste" level, or even a certain proportion, but the "consolidation" has cleverly avoided at this point.
More importantly, in the world of online novels, "melting the stalks" is a fairly common behavior. For novels like fantasy and cultivating immortals, you only need to read two of them at random to find the similarities. The plots are basically the same, the only difference is the "combination method".
An online novel author who can support himself has to write tens of thousands of words every day. It is difficult for you to use the traditional term "writing" to describe this behavior. They are not "creating" but "making". Even in the most successful online novels, there will be confusion of names and plots, and authors have to make corrections while making them.
This is the ecology of online literature. Perhaps some platforms don't want to hit Rongseng, because Rongseng is the production method of this industry. If they don't, not only the author's output will shrink, but the platform's traffic will also decrease. The platform relies on bytes to charge for mass production rather than artistry and originality. In addition to the pressure of public opinion, it is difficult to have the motivation to solve the chaos.
Plagiarism, washing the manuscript, Rongjing
Speaking of it, Rongjing can also be regarded as "plagiarism", but it is not simply plagiarism. As the literal meaning of these two words means, "Rong Geng" refers to the fusion of "Geng". "Stalk" is a special phenomenon in the Internet age. It may be a joke or a fragment.
Internet information is updated daily, and many "stalks" appear and disappear. If you do not go online for a month, you may not be able to understand the chats in the group, and you have missed too many "stalks". Whether it is the Spring Festival Gala sketches or various speeches on the Internet, many of the "golden sentences" or "baggage" are "integrated stalks", "old stalks" that incorporate the wisdom of many netizens.
However, the "fusion of stems" mentioned here is not entirely to draw on the wisdom of netizens, but can also refer to the plot of directly "drawing on" the works of other authors. Including love confession, breakup scenes, and even violent actions, the protagonist’s lines can be "utilized" or "regrouped."
In people's perception, plagiarism is not only unethical, but also illegal, because it clearly violates the intellectual property rights of others. But "washing manuscripts" is controversial, because it is no longer a simple copy and paste, but deep processing.Can evade the duplicate checking system.
"Rong Jing" is more advanced than the manuscript, because it is very different from the original in text. It can draw on the plot, even the logic of the story evolution, the arrangement of clues-it replicates creativity and wisdom, not Simple text. In this regard, Guo Jingming's "How much do you know about flowers in a dream" is an explanation.
Literally, "Rongshou" is more positive than washing manuscripts, and it seems that "creation" is only one step away. At present, many platforms and original authors have made a little progress in the blows to manuscript washing, but they are almost powerless to "melting stems". Therefore, some commentators pointed out that even if the original work of "Youth in Youth" is accused of being "RongGeng", it will be safe and sound. Can
conquer the world?
This integration has been controversial. An important reason may be that it was popular writers like Keigo Higashino; more importantly, it was played by a flow niche like Yi Yan Qianxi, which put the integration of online literature away. On different observation latitudes.
In the end, this is also a rare opportunity: "You are so beautiful as a young man" is "you who are so beautiful, so despicable", it needs professional judgment , There must be a basis for buckling the hat, and the integration does not affect the value of the film itself. However, with this controversy, it is necessary to drive more people to face up to the phenomenon of fusion in the online writing circle, and then think about how to deal with the chaos more effectively.
In other words, this discussion may be a new beginning. In the past, the controversy about fusion was limited to literature. Now this word-of-mouth movie takes this phenomenon out of the circle and puts it into a larger context. This may be able to give birth to "changing with time," The new counter-balancing force of "born with the trend".
is like washing manuscripts. Many original creators were frustrated by their powerlessness. After all, some "productions" depend on manuscript washing, and manuscript washing is their mode of production. However, after several large discussions, the public has also reached certain consensus on the restrictions on manuscript washing. For example, WeChat has set up a committee "washing complaints collegiate group" for manuscript washing, which makes up for the ambiguity and ambiguity of the law on manuscript washing. Not enough to hit. If an influential article is accused of washing, it is likely to be sanctioned.
Washing the original manuscript is hurting the original, and fusion is also destroying the original. When "Wenchao Gong" turned into a "good accommodator", and the non-pirate logic of "writing the author's thing, can it be called a copy" is popular, the original creator is bound to lose.
This point obviously needs to be realized by more people: for a "creator", "melting the stem" is dishonest; for the "melted" creator, it is also unfair. The so-called "melting stem" style of reference in the creation of online literature should also be re-examined.
The first thing that should be realized is the online literature platform that has symbiotic interest-related relationships with writers. For these platforms, this is also an opportunity to "prove yourself": the reading mode that relies on traffic seems to have reached a bottleneck, is there any online platform that can uphold originality?
(Editor in charge: Han Chong_NBJ11345)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-