"Moonfall": Invested 940 million, received only 250 million, and Hollywood blockbusters lost all their underpants

It is not uncommon for Hollywood to lose money in large investment films.

such as "Pearl Harbor", with an investment of 240 million, received a box office of 160 million, becoming a "tragedy" of Disney .

And this year there is also a sci-fi movie, which became the "first flutter of the year".

The sci-fi disaster movie " Moonfall " cost as much as $150 million (RMB 948 million).

finally earned only 39.28 million US dollars (250 million yuan), which can be said to have no bottoms left.


At present, this movie has been confirmed to be introduced to the mainland because of the participation of our work in China.

However, whether it can achieve a good box office is still unknown. In addition to American investment,

is also led by Huayi from the mainland. has invested more than 75 million yuan, occupying the majority of the film.

There are also Chinese actors in the movie.

is Yu Wenwen who played Lin Jia in "Predecessor Three".

However, it turns out that Huayi is really careless this time, and will lose everything.

The U.S. market is hitting the streets. When it comes to China, the possibility of turning the tide of the battle is not very high.

This movie, directed by Roland, is a disaster movie.

The moon was driven by a mysterious force, deviated from its original orbit and flew towards Earth.

When the earth suffered from the doomsday crisis and the people of the earth were desperate, a small team started the story of defending the earth and guarding peace.

The story is simple.

Director Roland, wrote and directed.

The director has directed classic movies such as " Godzilla ", " Independence Day ", " Battle of Midway " and "2012".

is also known as the "Master of Disaster Movies", and his films can be called blockbusters.

has hot scenes, human entanglements, and emotional blends. The

team is still very good.

But look at the comments of netizens. Most of

netizens' slots are still focused on illogical plots and characters. Some netizens on

pointed out that the plot is really "conspiracy theory".

"The logic doesn't go well, the characters don't match, it's not sci-fi, it's not disaster, it's not action, what did I watch?"

on Rotten Tomatoes , the freshness of the movie is only 38%.


"The plot is pointless, the dialogue sucks, the twists are hilarious, and when they're not supposed to be, it could be one of those bad movies that's a good movie for some people. For me, it's just bad. "

"This is for those who want to see the scenery explode and the big things fall onto other big things. These are the only pleasures on offer."

z1From z's point of view, the reputation of this movie has spread from North America to China.

So what's the problem with this movie?

Generally speaking, the unreasonableness of the plot occupies a large proportion. Although

said that the plot is very old-fashioned and thin, if the story is told more vividly, there are still many audiences who will pay for it.

However, there are many flaws that make the audience dislike it.

Personal heroism, the old way of saving the world by one person, the progression of the plot, the beginning and the end, are very deliberate and blunt.

The characters don't stand up and the story isn't perfect. At the same time,

is known as a "science fiction film", but it lacks scientific guidance, and the plot of hitting stones with eggs is far from reality.

Of course, is there any merit to such a large investment? There are still some

, ​​that is, the special effects of the movie, and some of them are still very novel.

sci-fi films focus on special effects, but the premise is to tell a good story, and the plot is the foundation.

But apparently, the movie doesn't take that into account.

Many viewers watched it and found it hard to imagine that it was directed by Roland.

After all, many of Roland's works are in the forefront, is it not enough now?

According to the current box office analysis, the return on investment should be at least three times the investment amount.

And this time the cost of 950 million is destined to be lost.

For domestic audiences, this period is considered a low season for the film industry.

During the Spring Festival, due to the problem of high ticket prices, fewer and fewer audiences entered the cinema, and the way of "drinking poison to quench thirst" in the cinema is not advisable.

Whether it is a domestic blockbuster or a Hollywood masterpiece, if you want the audience to support it with real money, you need to show sincerity.

In addition, in the past few years, the audience has become tired of the Hollywood blockbuster, and the large-scale Hollywood movies may not be able to get the support of the audience.

Last year, Marvel's four or five blockbusters all failed in the mainland, but did not stop the audience from entering the cinema, and the audience gradually got rid of "Hollywood dependence".

is a small but fine low-budget film that received a good box office.

such as " famous " is a dark horse (926 million).

"Hello Li Huanying" became the second in film history.

tells a good story, and creating innovative and sincere works is the kingly way.