Paul became so insensitive after the war that when he got home, he was unable to communicate his feelings with his family and gave up all attempts to restore his humanity. Soldiers on the front lines became so pragmatic in their training that when their comrade Kemmerridge died, the only thing they cared about was who would inherit his boots, the . In depicting the horrors of war, Remarque offers a sobering critique of the idea of nationalism as the trigger for World War I . As noble as it may be, nationalism is portrayed as an empty ideology, , driven by those in power who exploit civilians and control a nation's population. Paul and his friends enlisted in the military largely because they were inspired to act by nationalist ideas. However, the horrors of war soon taught them all to see the hypocrisy inherent in these ideas.
1930's "All Quiet on the Western Front"
Contrary to common assumptions, "All Quiet on the Western Front" is not the first time it has been remade. Director and screenwriter Edward Berger and co-writers Leslie Patterson and Ian Stocker did not look to the classic film that was first remade in 1930 for inspiration. Instead, they decided to stay as faithful to the original as possible, telling a version of the story that the previous adaptation hadn't chosen. However, the 2022 version of the story deviates from the original in many ways. Listed below are some of the key differences between the book and the 2022 edition.
article only represents personal opinion, only general, welcome comments and exchanges! The original popcorn movie, please retain the copyright for reprinting!
Cantorek played a lesser role
The hypocritical man, in the safety of his own classroom, uttered nationalist rhetoric full of propaganda about German pride and glory, thanks to director Eduard Berger, who The 2022 movie is not as important as it is in the book. In the book, it is he who instills dubious ideas about nationalism in children and pushes them to fight on the front lines. In the 1930 edition of the classic, Cantorek is the man behind the fateful journey of Paul and his friends. In the 2022 version, Paul's (Felix Camille) backstory is kept to a minimum when he lied about entering the military by forging his father's signature. Authority figures still exist, inspiring young men to risk everything to go to the front lines to maintain their integrity, and despite the unspeakable horrors of war, it didn't start in the classroom. Viewers don't see what drives Paul to the war, as the focus is more on the devastating effects of war on young people.
Kate's death
Stanislaus Kaczynski, or Kate as everyone calls him, had the most beneficial effect on Paul. His friendships are the crutches that keep him going, despite the mental and physical torment he suffers on a daily basis. After an indescribable horror, Paul felt so disconnected from his emotions and the world at large that he couldn't maintain a healthy relationship, let alone build, with anyone who hadn't been on the front lines with him. Kate is one of the few people Paul respects and finds solace in, and their connection becomes all the more poignant when Kate dies at the end of the book, not even in close combat. Kate suffered minor injuries from a shrapnel hit in the leg, and on the way Paul took him to the doctor, Kate suffered fatal injuries - a piece of shrapnel stabbed into his brain and died on the spot. In the film, Kate's death circumstances are slightly different, although they have equally devastating effects. In the film, Kate was shot by a local farmer's child and died instantly.
The Death of Paul
Anyone who has read this should know that Paul, the central character of All Quiet on the Western Front, dies at the end of the story. This nuanced detail speaks volumes about the author's most important thesis: Paul found more peace in death than he did in life. In the 2022 version of the story, Paul is mortally wounded and dies after a fierce close-quarters battle with his foes, who is forced into a final battle with his comrades. In the book, Paul's death is even more heartwarmingAcid, full of layered plots. He was shot while reaching for a butterfly, the most accurate symbol of peace and beauty, and Paul was deprived of his life.
Paul doesn't get a leave of absence in the film
While director Edward Berger takes his reading of the book as authentic as possible, he sometimes shifts his focus to the thematic aspects of the book. In contrast, the 1930 edition of the classic focuses more on narrative than the point of view the original author wanted to express. So, in the 2022 film, Paul doesn't get a leave of absence, and audiences see a different battle -- one between those who have the power to end the horror and propaganda of war. Edward Berger also used this departure from the plot line to show the difference between soldiers fighting on the front lines and senior officers enjoying fine meals. He also revealed the value of people like Paul in the eyes of high-ranking officials—just tools.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-