text/Ye Qiuchen
Regarding the case of Zhongshengtang in "Story of the Tang Dynasty", in fact, Ye Qiuchen has a lot of feelings that he wants to share with you.
first of all, is how to evaluate a person's quality.
On weekdays, we always encounter such problems.
thought he was pretty good in every way, but turned out to be a scumbag?
is a person with strong business skills, why is the interpersonal relationship so chaotic?
They have always treated people kindly and kindly, but there are corrupt scum behind them?
and so on.
In fact, most people have different sides. People
are originally a multi-faceted contradiction.
The real culprit behind the Zhongshengtang case in "The Story of Tang Dynasty" is Meng Donglao, who has excellent medical skills and has saved countless lives.
He opened a medical clinic and helped many people escape from the disease.
He killed women to write books on their bodies. What book did
write?
wrote medical books intended to save people. The story of
is very cleverly arranged. The purpose of killing people is to save more people, and many people will get entangled in the evaluation.
A person may have extraordinary shining points in a certain industry, and may even be called talented, but morally flawed. The evaluation of
cannot simply be judged as good or bad. If
wants to fully evaluate a person's quality, it needs to disassemble different parts to see.
's heinous bad guy, maybe there is a place to be praised.
seems like an ordinary person with no malicious intentions, but there are also small flames in his heart that make mistakes.
This is human nature.
This is normal.
Therefore, when evaluating Meng Dong, you cannot simply evaluate right or wrong.
He studies medical skills and wants to write medical books to benefit the common people.
It's wrong for him to kill people and hide them, and sacrifice others to help him. In
's film and television works, if the two sides of a character can be displayed, it is a success in shaping. Characters like
are full enough and worth thinking about.
are not just characters, but also real people.
Then, let's talk about Lu Lingfeng's handling.
He applied to send Meng Dong Lao to execute immediately, before he finished his medical book.
Is there a more optimized operation here?
is definitely there.
Meng Donglao fell into a state of madness in order to study the head disease, and did not hesitate to kill living people to do research.
His lifelong desire is to overcome the difficulty of treating head problems.
is dead.
If he is asked to complete the medical book and then executed, or to request immediate execution, which option is more valuable?
The big mistake has already been made. If you can leave a medical book useful to future generations on the basis of this sacrifice, is it more meaningful?
However, the author of this medical book deserves no credit. The creative process of
is even less worthy of admiration.
When future generations use this book, how will they view this case? Does
feel that as long as it can produce results that are beneficial to medicine, it is possible to kill innocent people indiscriminately?
Something grows from the heart and becomes very scary.
It seems inappropriate to leave only medical books and no creative background and author. According to
's analysis, what Lu Lingfeng did was just right.
But this question is indeed the dilemma that tortures human nature in "The Story of Tang Dynasty".
Faced with this choice, what would you choose?
Of course, in the end, Fei Jishi saved the people of Ju County from suffering through his efforts, and the result was good.
What if there is no chicken master?
After all, Lu Lingfeng never thought about it, Fei Jishi would take over from Meng Donglao and complete the work of the first problem.
passed the case, and Lu Lingfeng also began to haveReflecting, that's why he asked Pei Xijun this question.
What if Su Wuming handled this matter?
gradually understands empathy and chooses the best among the best.
From this, Lu Lingfeng also began to embark on a new path and entered a new plot, which is the story behind.
If it were you, facing the murderer in the Zhongshengtang case, before you knew that Fei Ji could develop a cure for the disease, would you leave a medical book and sentence him, or would you agree with Lu Lingfeng's approach?
welcome to leave a message in the comment area and share your views.
text / Ye Qiuchen
——————
—The copyright of this article belongs to the original author (@yeqiuchen), please contact the author for commercial reprinting, please indicate the source for non-commercial reprinting - plagiarism must be investigated - welcome to forward comments -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-