Today we talk about the Indian movie Jay Beam .
titled Jai Bhim (2021), alias Long Live Bhim / Long Live the Struggle.
"Jay Beam" was the most popular Indian movie on IMDb that year, and it was also the most searched Indian movie on Google that year, and it was the fourth place in the "Most Tweeted Movies of 2021" on Twitter website.
The film is based on the true case of Rajakannu in 1993 handled by Judge K Chandru, who said in an interview that he was most impressed with the case and wrote it into a screenplay.
The story takes place in India, a low-caste man Rajakanu was arrested on suspicion of theft and suffered inhuman treatment. Rajakanu's wife Sengeni (Sengeni) called for help everywhere and turned to human rights lawyer Chan Drew to get it back justice. In the
film, the personal charm of the male protagonist at all times, the heart-wrenching shock of the supporting actors, the oppression brought by the heavy theme, and the hearty narrative techniques are perfectly integrated, allowing the audience to feel the society on the spot. The plight of marginalized and vulnerable groups being oppressed and humiliated.
recommends everyone to watch this movie, especially for those with low blood pressure. After watching this movie, the low blood pressure will be cured on the spot.
is an Indian film that explores police brutality and caste violence. The film does not set the background in the common village and police station, but is set on a more critical court, using the court as the main stage to defend the bottom line of the law, forcing the state power to reflect. The real case depicted in the
movie dragged on for more than a decade in real life and was the longest habeas corpus case in the history of the Chennai High Court in Tamil Nadu, India. The case only dragged on for a year in the movie.
Judge Chandru was closely involved in the whole process from the discussion of the film's conception to the post-production. In an interview with the "Federal Daily", he said, "This film is not only a retelling of Sangani's tragic story, but also reveals more the persecution of vulnerable groups such as the Ilula tribe.” After the movie was released, the actor Surya received a large number of death threats from different parts of India.
These people accused Surya of deliberately orchestrating the case and "deliberately" creating a conflict between the "Vanniyars" and "Irulars" tribes.
Surya received special police protection at his residence after receiving death threats.
The experiences of Rajakanu and Sangani reflect caste brutality, extreme poverty, police corruption and many other issues.
The family does odd jobs for the MPs, but they don't even have the right to register their names; Sangani tried to ask the local MPs for help, but the MPs responded that the pariahs had no votes and would never take care of the pariahs; I worked hard all my life and made countless bricks, but I couldn't live in a brick house; people of low caste were arrested by the police at will, and the way the police communicated with people of low caste was sticks other than slaps.
The freedom provided by the law is of no use to anyone as long as one does not achieve social freedom.
Have the rich and powerful stopped oppressing the poor? The answer is no. This film uses a real case to tell all of this very well. Between vindication and injustice, there are still some determined people who are creating heroic stories.
The actor Surya is often seen in the film alongside a sculpture of Karl Marx, alongside Ambedkar and Periyar. This is not a simple set prop, on the contrary, every frame exudes a strong ideological flavor, and the film pays homage to the three of them in this way. I can't think of anyone other than communism who cares about these poor victims of the caste system.
This is a film that recklessly reflects institutional violence.
Why can bad people ignore all legal systems and harm good people, but good people have to follow all legal systems to prove their innocence. Every dialogue in the
film is deep, every expression is measured, and every message is meaningful. With such an intense film, the director powerfully portrays the silent suffering of the oppressed.
This film accurately reproduces the cases that Judge Chandrew handled when he was a lawyer.
Many people may not know Judge Chandrew, one of the most respected judges in the legal profession, known for his decisions affecting a large number of the poor and oppressed in society.
A judge is known to make an average of about 10,000 to 20,000 rulings in his career, while Judge Chandru has made up to 96,000 rulings, including for 25,000 poor women in the lunch program Employment and other rulings.
"Jay Beam" does not make the male protagonist an omnipotent savior like other Indian entertainment films, there are no out-of-time singing and dancing, no fighting that ignores physics, but focuses on portraying a reasonable Well-documented human rights lawyer who petitions for the people.
Chan Drew is not the savior, not the invulnerable superman nor the rich Batman , he is just an ordinary person with flesh and blood, he also has joys and sorrows, and also feels fear and fear, but he did not flinch, but Overcome fear with confidence. The
film, with its deep thought and heavy expressive content, makes an impeccable film worthy of all the accolades and accolades he has received.
speaks for justice for the people,
fights for human nature and conscience.
This is the distribution center for hardcore movie fans, welcome to pay attention to the public account: Miaokan Film and Television
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-