's "Er Xi" is a controversy, and there are good teams and good works.
If the previous disagreement on the score can also be explained as the difference in aesthetic taste, then the third issue will make the audience feel not humorous, but angry.
"You're going to marry him today", "Primary school students' composition", "Mama's Taste", are the five school flowers recommended for promotion in the third issue worthy of a high score?
The author thought it was impossible. These works barely made it to the top 16, or it was barely acceptable to make a profit from the elimination list.
Because the show itself has a mechanism for attracting people, there is no need for the tutor to be so biased.
's approach is unfair to a high-quality production like Big Ben in London.
has high standards for high-level works and low standards for low-level works. What is the credibility of the program? How to convince the crowd?
"You're going to marry him today" ranked 6th on the initial stage, which is a shame for comedy.
And many people's favorite "Love in Mount Lu" was not only eliminated, but even the opportunity to be fully broadcast was also deprived. If
hadn't seen so many people complaining about "Love on Mount Lu" and went to watch the show, I would have thought that "Love on Mount Lu" was really not worth mentioning.
Miwei has carried forward the black humor to the extreme.
"You're Marrying Him Today" tells the story of two Luthers in love who go to a girl's wedding and perform a humiliating and embarrassing story in front of the girl's crush on the senior. The theme of
is actually quite suitable. You must have attended several weddings during the National Day holiday. Maybe there will be resonance?
But the show is not funny, it's boring.
The handsome and sunny senior is mainly responsible for the on-site commentary function, which is customized to show the actor's face, which is completely redundant.
Every nonsense of his seems to question the meaning of the existence of the audience's eyes and performance science.
The other two actors, one is the bride's ex-boyfriend, the other is the bride's primary school crush.
's identity setting can generate many laughs, but it does not dig deep in the works. What the audience sees is just two weirdos, and the inner differences between them are actually very small.
Imagine that the ex-boyfriend can be more extreme. It is in line with the logic of the stage to drink alcohol or lose control of his emotions, and it can also create more dramatic conflicts. In the same way, a crush in primary school can be a deep lover to the extreme, not to mention how much the crush in primary school is still in adulthood? Even if it is a crush for decades, there are always some more unforgettable memories than the classmates' comments and the like, right? Elementary school classmates are usually locals. Could it be that he has witnessed the growth of the girl, or that he has his own way to unilaterally maintain his love for the girl?
must have details of life, right? The result is nothing. They just act for the sake of acting.
is very suspicious of whether the screenwriter and actor have ever been in a relationship? Have you attended a wedding? Have you experienced real life?
The truth is that the three actors in "You're Marrying Him Today" are Mi Wei's employees. All of them have just graduated from college. Some of them have worked in film and television dramas and have almost no social experience. Therefore,
's script was a mess, the actor's performance was not bright, the audience couldn't laugh at all, and there was no emotional resonance , it was not a problem. When the boss wants to support the newcomer, he can say that you can do it, you can do it, you can't accept it, and you can't accept it.
"Primary Student Composition" is a work that makes people feel uncomfortable throughout the whole process.
thought it was already 2022. Since they dared to openly reverse history at the beginning, the main creator must have a deeper expression, and the ending must be reversed and sublimated.
However, after pinching their noses, the audience will find that this is a script found in the wastebasket decades ago.
is the Spring Festival Gala routine work that Mi Wei hates and the level of the Spring Festival Gala sketches is 108,000 miles away.
Guo Jingming How many years ago he used "mopping the floor" and "undressing", is he still using it now?
When I think of the Chinese teacher because elementary school students confuse "life" with "umbrella"Confused, and hysterically emphasizing that it was a typo, the twisted face was creepy. Elementary school teachers laugh at elementary school students for lack of culture, what kind of coke is there? The moldy jokes can amuse the judges, is it a comedy comeback resurgence?
, a work at the level of "primary students' composition" has won five flowers, which is terrible.
"Mama's Smell" tells the story of consumer kidnapping and migrant workers leaving their homes, and it is also one of the most ridiculed works. There are three things not to tell in this story: no laws, no morals, and no logic.
A customer placed an order and paid for it, but the dish served was a different set. The merchant had an arrogant attitude and went his own way. He was suspected of forced buying and selling, which seriously violated the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.
Second, the merchants kidnap customers emotionally without explanation. The waiter must be the mother of the customer, and the manager brings in the customer's grandmother, regardless of whether the customer accepts or agrees. The so-called "corporate culture" is imposed on customers in the name of "love".
If businesses really "think about customers", they should consider that customers who work overtime until late at night just want to have a full meal, rather than acting with the business and accompany the "fake mother" and "fake grandma".
In the end, the customer was successfully brainwashed by the merchant, reconciled with the merchant, and gave up his claim. He not only spent money to recognize his mother, but also thanked them for their "care".
This is too outrageous, is it "Mother's Taste"? Or the smell of "Stockholm Syndrome"?
is divorced from real life experience, the aesthetic taste is outdated, and the moral kidnapping of the audience is wishful thinking. How can it be possible to make a good comedy together with such bugs?
didn't expect that watching the show would be more exciting than watching netizens complain. Comments are more funny than the show. Don't know what to laugh at? Or sad?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-