After the star artist "turned over", is it really necessary to remove the previous works "one size fits all"?

This article was originally written by "I write stories in Guangdong" (ilove-style).

Author: Guang Tsai, a businessman, five-star writer.

analyzes the human nature and psychology behind the story, and explores the deep logic mechanism of the event.


I recently purchased a 4TB portable hard drive online.

Colleague asked me, have you made so many love action movies that you can't even fit on the computer hard drive?

I smiled and said, you can't borrow it from me to copy it, this is illegal! In fact,

is mainly used to download and store some domestic and foreign movies that I think are classics and worthy of a long aftertaste.

In the past two years, there have been star artists in China who have been "collapsed" and have been banned by the General Administration of Thinking about whether it is necessary to continue to retain VIP members of several mainstream video platforms.

Last week, Zhang Yishan 's rumors on the Internet caused many people to worry that the "Family with Children" series would be taken off the shelves. How many people's youth did the "Family with Children" series accompany? It will make a lot of people sad if it is taken off the shelf.

is not only a domestic star artist, but also foreigners.

Donnie Yen and Keanu Reeves 's " Chase 4" is not about to be released? But now the mainstream domestic video platforms have not been able to find any works of Keanu Reeves, it is said that he is involved in sensitive political activities. It is estimated that "Fast Pursuit 4" will not be able to go to theaters in China by then.


So the question is, is it necessary to "one size fits all" to remove the works of "personality collapse" and mistaken star artists who have participated in performances in the past?

I think this approach is debatable. The first reason for

is to take down all the works directly, which will easily affect many innocent artists and staff in front of and behind the scenes.

You must know that the production of a movie or a TV series is not done by a single star artist, but by the joint efforts of dozens, hundreds or even thousands of front and back staff.

includes male and female leading actors, many supporting roles, passers-by, screenwriters, directors, producers, editors, photography, special effects, investors, sponsors, distribution companies...

If one of the actors made a mistake, the whole movie will be taken off the shelves. Movies or TV series, how many people's hard work and sweat are wasted? They are innocent, and they should not carry the blame.

banning a star can prohibit him from continuing to engage in acting work in the future, or it can prohibit him from continuing to participate in the copyright tax dividends of past works.

However, if a wonderful and classic film is shot because of a certain star artist, it will not only cut off the reasonable and legal royalty income of other co-creators, but also make a good work buried.

From the perspective of the audience, I think this kind of treatment is inappropriate.

Looking at the whole world, that is, our country has the strictest requirements on the personal and public morals of celebrity artists, and all bad actors are banned from the entire network. The official explanation of

is that being a star artist is an idol-level existence, and it should play a positive guiding role. When they make mistakes, they can no longer act as positive energy guides, so they should be completely banned.

When it comes to positive guidance, it is mainly for teenagers. For grown-ups, it's none of my business that the star made a mistake? I don't care how he guides, I just appreciate his work. Adults can really look at celebrity artists completely separate from their work.

is like Leehom, and many people around me have expressed this opinion: his yue guns and piao prostitutes are his business,If you commit a crime, you will be fined and imprisoned. But I really like many of his songs, don't take his songs off the shelf!

When it comes to the impact on teenagers, I think the most important thing in China is to keep up with the international pace and adopt a movie classification system. Which works are suitable for teenagers and which are suitable for adults, and different audit standards are adopted. .


The second reason is that such an operation may cause a large area of ​​excellent works to be removed from the shelves.

Celebrities are actually ordinary occupations and ordinary jobs. We deify and elevate their social status intentionally or unintentionally.

Artists are okay, they can be regarded as cultural people, such as writers, screenwriters, directors, composers, lyricists, etc. Their practice is generally higher than ordinary people.

But the stars in the entertainment circle are actually the ancient troupe members, and some may simply be because they look better, that's all, other aspects are not much different from the general public.

Celebrities are also human, and they want to do all the bad things that the public want to do. The work intensity of celebrities is also beyond ordinary people. Today, they are rushing to the production crew, tomorrow they are rushing to commercial performances, and the day after tomorrow, they will attend the press conference of new works. The high-intensity work arrangement makes their pressure and emotions unable to release, and they often need more perverted bad things to vent.

Huang Shengyi 's husband Yang Zi once said publicly on the show that 90% of the stars he knows are uneducated people.


is illiterate, and there is a high probability that he is also legally illiterate, so it is not uncommon to do something illegal or moral.

So, how many people in the entertainment industry can really stand up to the scrutiny of morality and law? "Rollover" is just a matter of probability and time.

With the continuous improvement of the reporting and supervision mechanism, there will definitely be more and more star artists who "turn over" in the future, so many works related to them will be removed from the shelves of the whole network.

It doesn't matter if you say that the junk works are taken off the shelves, it would be a pity if the works of the star and the master were taken off the shelves. For example, " Journey to the West: Fighting the Demon Chapter ", which is a collaboration between Wu and Zhou Xingchi and Tsui Hark , has been taken off the shelves. Fortunately, I downloaded the high-definition version in advance.

This way of handling may also cause a chain reaction. Investors and producers will become timid when setting up projects and selecting actors, worrying that the investment will be lost, and they feel that the risk of investing in the film and television industry is too high. This is not conducive to the development of the entire industry.

is actually most affected by our audience, and many nostalgic film and television works have been removed from the shelves. We just want to watch some movies and TV shows for entertainment, not to learn ideology and morality.

I still say the same thing: I support the banning of bad actors, and don't let them continue to work and don't let them continue to participate in royalty distributions, but it's best not to remove all previous works, and you can selectively remove some of the badly affected works.

Otherwise, it is estimated that everyone will buy a large-capacity mobile hard disk like me.

After all, it is not so reasonable and reasonable for a person to deny all his past achievements when he has made a mistake now.


's article only represents personal opinions, and there are many differences and disagreements.

welcome comments and share your thoughts and knowledge with the world.

pictures are from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.