Just over a month ago, Yi Yang Qianxi caused a lot of uproar on the Internet because of the examination of the National Theatre, and also brought a new term such as "small town to be an essayist". Whether the procedure of this matter is unreasonable or not, the two sides hold their own opinions, and finally did not see any convincing conclusion, because there is no third party involved in the investigation, it is definitely difficult to convince the public based on the unilateral rhetoric of the parties. . Yi Yangqianxi, who was under various pressures, finally chose to voluntarily give up joining the National Theatre, which was the end of the matter. From this point of view, Yi Yang Qianxi is still responsible. It is not easy to make such a decision, whether it is true or for show. At the same time as giving up the job, Yi Yang Qianxi also issued a notice, which is what we commonly call a small composition. There is nothing wrong with this small composition of
. It simply tells the story of what happened, and at the same time explains it for myself, and finally announces my decision. This article is quite satisfactory, there is neither any bright literary talent nor any flaws worthy of reproach. Objectively speaking, it is an ordinary manuscript, and we have seen many such articles. Almost every public opinion event of a celebrity will publish such an article, although the content is different, but the style is similar.
But it is such an ordinary small composition, which was recently sent to students by a school in Jiangsu as composition material. In addition, they analyze and interpret sentence by sentence in an orderly manner, and students are also required to copy and accumulate in the material book. Covering hundreds of students across the grade. We really don't know whether it is because there are too few excellent materials or what is the reason. Why would we consider such a small composition without any representation as a material to require students to read and comprehend? I personally don't think so. After all, it is also an era of great talents. There are many excellent articles. If we don't discuss the existence of some classic articles, many netizens' online articles are much more exciting than Yi Yangqianxi's small compositions. . Although this small composition must be carefully worded, it is only to avoid everyone's misunderstanding rather than to make the article exciting. This is a completely different starting point.
I saw the pictures uploaded by netizens, and the teacher must be well-intentioned. I have carefully analyzed every sentence of this small composition. It seems that such an ordinary announcement hides something like Yan Ruyu and the Golden House, which can bring huge treasures to the improvement of students' writing quality. It is estimated that it is Lu Xun. The works of literary masters such as Lao She cannot enjoy such treatment. But carefully scrutinizing the teacher's analysis, the subjective will is greater than the objective and rational. What is neither humble nor arrogant, extremely high-quality, moving, and effective, etc., are all from the perspective of personal subjective emotions, and are basically separated from the analysis of literary works themselves. This kind of analysis is obviously not carried out from the writing technique, why does it feel that there is a bit of private goods in it?
It is certainly possible to study such an article as a public relations case for media majors, because this is the main purpose of this small composition, and the target group is mainly these people, not students' writing sample essays. But as a high school student's excellent model essay analysis, it seems a bit unreliable. We don't know whether it is because of the tendency of teachers' personal cognition or what the reason is, but this kind of teaching definitely deviates from the center of teaching and education. In addition to mobilizing the fun of some students, it seems to improve students' writing literacy. There really isn't much benefit. Regardless of whether this small composition is written by Yi Yangqianxi himself, its ultimate purpose is just to give the public an explanation, so it pays more attention to the stacking of details and the rigor of logic, and does not care about whether the literary talent is flourishing, let alone care about it. An excellent article on the interframe structure , as this is not the core issue.
Didn't the Ministry of Education explicitly prohibit star-chasing behavior from entering the campus? What is this trying to do? Simply outrageous! In this matter, Yi Yang Qianxi did not make any mistakes, and he personally did not take the initiative to do any work. It should be reflected that some of our teachers, if it is only a matter of personal level, can't judge the level of the article, it is still desirable, but if some personal preferences are brought into the campus and classroom by this way of entraining private goods, It is nakedly against the policies of the relevant state departments. The analysis of an unrepresentative essay will not lower students' writing level, butIt is against the morality of teachers to implicitly bring the influence of celebrities into the classroom. Today's children are very smart and have their own independent thinking ability. They can still guess such preferences. Otherwise, so many stars have published small compositions, why is this not-so-classic composition by Yi Yang Qianxi? Was it taken as a model essay by the teacher?
stars and teachers are people who have a great influence on children, so they should act with caution. Some of your own inconspicuous behavior may affect many behaviors of children. Of course, teachers have the right to chase stars, but that is a personal matter, and personal behavior should not be brought into the public space! Especially on campus!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-