On the evening of September 19, the TV series " Bottom Line " premiered on Hunan Satellite TV . At 8 o'clock that night, the play was launched on several genuine video platforms with 6 episodes. Based on the content of the several episodes that have been launched so far, I think that this TV series is very close to the life of ordinary audiences, has relatively good legal value, and the rhythm of the plot is also passable. Therefore, it will become a TV drama with relatively good recent broadcast data and audience reputation. The real-time ratings of
Kuyun also proved my opinion. According to the real-time data of Cool Cloud, after the launch of Hunan Satellite TV, the viewership rate of "Bottom Line" has risen to more than 0.5% in a short period of time. As for the content of the later plot, the ratings have been maintained and achieved a relatively good jump. My personal data intuition is that if there are no accidents, the ratings of "The Bottom Line" will continue to rise in the next few days. The final ratings of this drama broke 1%, so there should be no problem.
I don't really want to believe that which actor can bring their own ratings, although the TV series starring , Jin Dong and do always have good ratings. For the work "Bottom Line", based on the current plots, I think it can be called a very high-quality work at the story level. For such judicial TV dramas, the most important point in the narrative is that it should be controversial, even to the point of saying that the public is reasonable and the mother is reasonable. Only in this way can
finally present the professionalism of judicial staff. "Bottom Line" begins with two judicial cases. One of them is whether it constitutes self-defense when he sees his mother being sexually insulted and his son wounding with a knife. The second is the sudden death of the Internet celebrity anchor in the Internet celebrity incubation company. Is the relationship between the two brokers or labor relationship ? What is the relationship, which determines whether the Internet celebrity company should bear the compensation.
In these two cases, different judges have different opinions and are controversial. Therefore, after being deduced in "The Bottom Line", it seems very interesting. Content that is not controversial is placed in the TV series, forming a one-sided situation, and it is not good to look at. In terms of story creation, the two screenwriters of "The Bottom Line" are very knowledgeable, and the content they have created so far is also very watchable.
At the same time, because these two cases are not far from the general audience, everyone has a certain amount of sense of substitution. "The Bottom Line" has launched two episodes, and the ratings are relatively dazzling, which is also the reason. If the follow-up cases of this TV series are still those cases that are closer to ordinary audiences, the ratings of this TV series will continue to rise.
Of course, by this, I also raise a little concern. Because the narrative of "Bottom Line" is a controversial case, in the play, the final judgment of these cases cannot be wrong. These controversies, in the content of the plot, ultimately need to come to a correct and reasonable judicial decision. Otherwise, this TV series will not be able to play a role in popularizing the law, and it will also betray the trust of the audience. Based on this, I am more concerned about whether the final results of these controversial cases really conform to the relevant legal provisions and the true judgments of the judges.
In the official information of this TV series, I did not see any state-related institutions in the judicial profession appearing in the list of guiding units. It may be that my verification is incomplete, if so, I hope readers will correct me. If it is only based on the screenwriter's own investigation and creation, it may fall into the dilemma of not being professional enough at the judicial level. Especially in some controversial cases, it is worth asking whether the screenwriter's own judicial knowledge and the trial results constructed from this knowledge are consistent with the real trial results.
Combining the above perceptions, I think that the TV series "Bottom Line" has a very good case controversy from the perspective of screenwriting and creation, and it is a really good TV series. However, it is beyond my knowledge level to talk about the professional issues of judicial cases without leaving the TV drama profession itself. And whether the quality of "Bottom Line" is really high, the final standard is the trial results in the play, which need to match the real judicial trial results and process. Whether it matches, I don't know, it needs to be left to professional judicial workers.
starring, really impressive, in fact, Cheng Yi . ThisThe child used to give the impression that he was a traffic star who made a traffic drama. This time, in "The Bottom Line", the role he played was able to convince the audience, and it was quite agile. This is a young actor with spirituality. It is recommended to take the power route instead of the traffic route in the future.
Jin Dong and Cai Wenjing belong to the stable. Jin Dong's performance is the same, and there is not much surprise. Of course, in "The Bottom Line", when Jin Dong's role was mediating, the Changsha dialect was also very flavorful. This is the interesting point. Cai Wenjing is also stable and lacks a sense of surprise. Both actors are in their roles, relying on the script and character design. The play is good, it should be mainly the script. At the end of
, let's add that whether "Bottom Line" is good or bad, we need to wait for professional legal workers to say. Because it is a TV drama with the function of popularizing the law, the legal content in it needs to be true and correct. I'm not a legal worker, I can only speak at the TV drama level. In order to fully comment on this TV series, it is necessary for legal workers to correct mistakes, or to prove that there is nothing wrong with the play. (Text / Ma Qingyun)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-