Li Yifeng's works were removed from the shelves, and his alma mater took down his posters. Netizen: Is this necessary? Have

Since the Li Yifeng incident occurred, various platforms, businesses, alma mater, etc. have taken the following actions.

First, the CCTV ​​Mid-Autumn Festival party deleted the works immediately, then the brands terminated the cooperation, then the sponsors of the various awards he won proposed to revoke the awards he won, and finally the alma mater took down his posters .

For these things, many people are discussing whether it is necessary or not, my answer is yes, we might as well briefly talk about why it is necessary.

First of all, if CCTV doesn't cancel his program at the Mid-Autumn Festival Gala, it means that CCTV's acquiescence to his behavior, at least that it is not a big thing, will give the society a bad direction. The

brand side is also a reason.

The most tangled thing for many people is that there is a problem with the artist, and the work is removed from the shelves, something is wrong.

I think this is a helpless move, but it is also the most effective way. Because artists are individuals and have their own thoughts, you cannot be sure that they will do some behaviors that are detrimental to social morality. The only way is to restrict them through all factors such as producers and directors. Who loses the most when

delists products?

are of course the producers and directors. If there are so many things like this, they will have high moral requirements for actors when choosing roles, instead of just choosing traffic. They will also sign some agreements with actors. These The agreement will also make the actors somewhat restrained. Therefore, only if one party feels pain, can he stand up and restrain all parties.

Of all these behaviors, I only have reservations about school behavior.

There is no problem with canceling the posters of problematic artists, but as a place for teaching and educating people, every time such a problem occurs, should we reflect on how to improve the moral education of students for the school, instead of withdrawing the posters It has nothing to do with me, this is contrary to school education.

Of course, we can't say that the problems of these artists are all in the school, family is also very important, as well as the environment and personal virtue.

But the school is a part of shaping the character and morality of these students, and the school has a certain responsibility for any problems these students have.

therefore just revoke without reflection, meaningless.

Above are some of my personal thoughts.