The second film "No": A downright environmental film was blown as the best horror film of 2022

said about the movie "No", what are the "best horror movies in 2022", "horror movies that must be watched this year", etc. The dazzling secondary editing of major APP scissors has made this movie hang before it is released. audience appetite. But when you watch the feature film, I just want to ask: is it what you expected it to be? Do you really understand?

The movie opens for an hour, and many viewers may think that they have downloaded the wrong resource: what about the UFO? What about the air monsters? But that's exactly what director Jordan Peele does best. " Escape " uses 's unequal treatment of people of color, groups, gay groups, female groups and other topics as the theme of the movie, "We" expresses racial discrimination and an intensifying sense of social division The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Therefore, "No" is not a horror movie at all.

The story in the film takes place in a wild park in southern California, USA. The first scene uses a 60x wide-angle to show us the beauty of the endless sky and clouds, for fear that the audience will not know that the photographer is Nolan and . It is far away from the reinforced jungle, without the noisy and noisy environment of the big city. Isn't this a virgin land gifted by nature?

However, there is an ominous thing hidden behind the seemingly insipid: I thought it was a UFO in the traditional sense at first, and it was not until it was deformed that I suddenly realized that this is not a broken parachute? And this is exactly what the director is brilliant at: why use parachutes as a metaphor for monsters?

1, the main chemical components of the parachute are aramid and kevlar, both of which are high-strength fiber materials extracted from petroleum, mixed with nylon and polyamide . The parachute made of this material has low density, high strength, good toughness, high temperature resistance and tear resistance. To put it bluntly, it is a super plastic. We all know how difficult it is to decompose ordinary plastic, let alone this?

2, the principle of using the parachute is just in line with the setting of monsters appearing from the air.

3. There will be power outages and signal interference wherever the monsters go. Let's imagine boldly, what is there from an altitude of more than 10,000 meters? Yes, that's right, it's junk, 170 million pieces of space junk orbiting the earth. During the peak of solar activity, the corresponding ionosphere disturbance generated by these junk can cause abnormal changes and phases of reflected signals across the ionosphere and ionosphere Drift, which brings positioning errors, and even causes the GPS receiver , the very low frequency navigation and positioning system and the over-the-horizon radar system to receive normal signals.


Seeing this, do you have a bold idea: Since the impact of human beings on the environment can release a virus that has been sleeping for thousands of years, it can cause a variety of organisms to cause deformities and mutations in the evolutionary chain, intensifying high temperature and La Niña phenomenon... Then A monster that combines multiple types of space junk under the dual action of the sun and the earth suddenly appeared in the air, enough to make headlines? Is it enough to draw attention to environmental pollution? The setting of

and the monsters only eat people further supports the above inference. When the monsters hang above the male protagonist's house, they are obviously excreting. Look at the discharged things: keys, coins, signs, plastic covers and various fragments , which are almost all the garbage produced in human daily life. Think about it: even monsters can't digest these things, so how long does it take nature?

At the end of the film, when the heroine released a giant doll of almost the same material, it rose into the air and was swallowed by the monster, and then an ironic scene appeared: the monster exploded! Sure enough, only garbage can destroy garbage!

Of course, the above are just the bold inferences made by the author after the second brush, combined with the two previous films of Jordan PeeleYour interpretation and ideas, welcome to express your views in the comment area below.