As of the time of posting, Baidu Baike did not even include the film in Li Rengang's entry. The most recent work we saw was the 2016 "Tomb Raiders Notes". Of course, as everyone knows, that work has sunk, and it has sunk both word of mouth and box office. In the next three years, the director may prepare and shoot the new film. Just looking at sincerity, it seems that there is also, if at this time, it can be justified if it can be fired for three years.
However, the work will not lie in the end. If it is confused, it will be confused. No matter how to play the sentiment card, no matter how to emphasize the joining of Wu Jing and others, it seems that the reputation cannot be restored. Therefore, when the audience collectively complain, you have to catch it, and when you praise you, you must know that you may be scolded in the future. Win without arrogance and defeat without discouragement is good. So I have to complain about it next.
The movie "Climber" came into our sight gradually after the "Wandering Earth" fire at the beginning of this year. In fact, it is because of Wu Jing, an actor and director who has become one of the most prominent figures in today's domestic films by virtue of "Wolf Warrior 2" and "Wandering Earth". There are many popular people, naturally, this film can use Wu Jing's influence to gain a wave of audience attention, but at the same time, it will also be under pressure because of this wave of audiences. What pressure? Naturally it is quality.
Wu Jing's "Wolf Warrior 2" has become a milestone in the history of domestic films, and the starring "Wandering Earth" is also a milestone in the history of domestic science fiction films. Naturally, as a main theme movie, "The Climber" also contains a little bit of disaster film. What the audience expects, it goes without saying. But after watching, this kind of expectation seems to be nothing but expectation. Why do you say that? Take a look at this film first.
"The Climber" tells a story that everyone knows but doesn't know much about. Usually, for such a story, we first need to know where the audience is, and only after knowing the audience can you tell a good story. "Climber" tells the story of Chinese mountaineers who climbed Mount Everest and re-mapped. What is the audience for this story? Of course it is how the climbers climb the peak and how the surveying and mapping personnel survey and map. This is the theme of this story. Because domestic climbers climbed the summit of Mount Everest and re-mapped, everyone knows this story from the 1970s, and what everyone doesn't know is the details of this story. Therefore, director Li Rengang needs to let everyone know the whole story and restore the details to the greatest extent. That's right. But did this film do that? Obviously not.
This film adds friendship and a lot of love to the story line of the climbers climbing Everest. The cause and effect of the story that should be emphasized, turned out to be a side dish of the love drama in the film. This is a bit embarrassing. What is the true story of Chinese climbers climbing Mount Everest? A large number of reference materials contain such detailed descriptions. "At 4:20 am on May 25, 1960, three Chinese heroes: Wang Fuzhou, Gongbu, and Qu Yinhua finally brought the five-star red flag to Mount Everest. The second summit was also the first ascent from the northern slope in human history. Unfortunately, due to the lack of image data, the summit was not recognized by the West. So 15 years later, China decided to organize a climbing team for the second ascent. Mount Everest. On May 27, 1975, nine Chinese players: Sonam Lobu, Hou Shengfu, Sangzhu, Da Phuntsok, Luo Ze, Gongga Basang, Tsering Dorje, Abu Chin, and Pando completed the collective summit. With the success of this summit, a series of "firsts" were born: the world's most numerous team from the northern slopes of the Himalayas; the world's first woman to successfully climb Mount Everest; the first time to use precision Measured the height of the world's highest peak-since then, the world has adopted the "Chinese height" of 8848.13 meters at that time." This is the prototype of the story.
Li Rengang himself once said, "We don't want to make a so-called heroic dedication story, but we want the audience to feel the greatest sincerity." Therefore, a large number of scenes in the film fell on the brothers among the climbers. Love, love. There is no problem with this kind of setting to shoot a story that everyone knows, but for this story that everyone just knows but hasn't understood seriously, obviously, this kind of argument is not convincing.
The cast of this film can be called luxurious, Wu Jing, Zhang Ziyi, Zhang Yi, Hu Ge and other actors, these people together should have an amazing story for everyone, look back at this year’s country"The Captain of China", one of the Qing troikas, is also a piece of news, and the same is the story that everyone knows, but lacks a serious understanding of the story, the same theme, the only drawback is that the cast is not comparable to the film . But why is Liu Weiqiang able to tell this story well, but the story in this film is so bad?
, as a director who is known for his artistic skills, he brazenly advocates the large number of green screen composite scenes in the film and the massive special effects production in the later stage, which is a bit unreasonable. Short shooting time is not a reason for the director to be lazy, and heavy shooting tasks are not an excuse for crude production. Since we want to direct this film, we should have enough respect for this story. The actors are okay. Wu Jing has done a good job in setting the characters in the film. The other actors have also performed well, but it is embarrassing to get together. Is this the director's responsibility?
Why did you say that Li Rengang pitted Wu Jing? If you don’t have these actors, then maybe the title of the film should be changed to "Everest Love". It seems more appropriate.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-