incident was fermented, the public was furious. Hundreds of millions of netizens joined forces to defend Xinjiang cotton. Within a day, 43 celebrity co-artists had terminated their contracts. All major e-commerce platforms directly let H&M find no such card. The accusations made by these brands against Xinjiang by
are completely ridiculous!
To what extent can their remarks be absurd? These FMCG brands have learned from the poor performances of Western politicians and fabricated a series of lies such as "forced labor, sexual abuse, and torture." According to them, China is forcing thousands of ethnic minorities to live in Xinjiang. Cotton fields are engaged in manual labor. The most ridiculous thing about
is that these plausible allegations do not even have a picture or a video, and all the claims are based on reliable evidence. It's really just opening up at the beginning of the game, and the content depends entirely on editing. The absurd remarks of
and H&M and Nike are not new this year. The two companies made these statements on the external network last year, but they secretly blocked the Chinese servers and did not dare to let domestic netizens know about it until Western sanctions. It only surfaced a few days after the announcement, showing how guilty they are.
Before the event was fermented, Xinjiang cotton farmers had invited the EU envoys to China many times to visit, but the other party delayed in every possible way because they were afraid that their lie would be exposed. It can be seen that you will never wake up a person who pretends to be asleep. What exactly do these polite "boycotters" intend to do?
In fact, the driving force behind these brands is a cotton development organization called BCI, and the funder who helped BCI go from unknown to rapid growth is the United States.
has a classic thesis, that is, human beings cannot imagine things they have not seen, nor can they make up things they are completely unfamiliar with. The United States has original sin in cotton-cotton slaves. Every sentence of their accusations against China actually insinuates themselves.
and the purpose is not to protect the interests of farmers at all, but to smash cotton to rot in the ground and smash farmers' jobs. Only by suppressing Xinjiang's cotton can the US's own cotton have the opportunity to take advantage of the emptiness and flow into the world.
These rumors-making brands know that lies can hurt the enemy one hundred, and self-defeating eight thousand, so why can they be confident?
After all, they just don't want to believe that China can already look at the world, and China is not inseparable from them. These Western brands always carry a sense of arrogance. Although the quality of H&M's clothes is obvious to all, it is arrogant that the Chinese people chase after its clothes. Although Nike Adi has long since moved to Vietnam to start construction, but they are I feel arrogantly that countless people will be laid off if China loses them. The self-confidence of
is their confidence.
But they did not expect that the Chinese people's backbone is straight and their knees are hard. When they wantonly smeared China, they were sentenced to death by us.
As netizens are increasingly resisting the wave, H&M had to issue a statement saying that it “respects Chinese consumers as always” and is currently cooperating with more than 350 manufacturers in China and will be committed to the long-term development in China. Investment and development.
The translation of this painless statement is: We do not respect Chinese consumers, but we still want to earn Chinese money. There is a sentence from
that is very suitable for the likes of H&M, that is: pick up the bowl for dinner, put down the bowl and scold your mother.
For these people who want to spread rumors and make money in China while they want to spread rumors and make Chinese money, I will give you four big words: wishful thinking!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-