reported on November 27 that on the evening of the 27th, Xianzi published the information about the trial and then issued a document requesting Zhu Jun to come to court in person: The sexual assault allegation involves the relationship between two people in a closed space. All should be presented in court. Full text of
:
saw Xianzi/Zhu Jun's entry on hot search, thanks for your attention. But we want to get attention because this case is not only about individuals, but also about many people: women, the rights of the weak, and social justice.
Before the trial, our biggest appeal at was not victory, but the public trial and Zhu Jun himself.
requested public hearings because Zhu Jun and I both requested public hearings, and it was unreasonable to refuse public hearings and should not become a practice.
Xianzi
asked Zhu Jun himself to appear in court. The sexual assault allegation involves the relationship between two people in a closed space. The statements, memories and reactions of both parties should be presented in court.
In civil litigation, although the defendant does not have to appear in court, there are exceptions such as divorce and custody, because such cases involve judgments about personal relationships-such judgments are equally important in sexual harassment trials, so both parties are charged Should also be in court.
It wasn't until 19 years that the civil code included the cause of sexual harassment for the first time. Compared with other civil litigations, the cases of sexual harassment litigation can be said to be very few and still in a blank stage. Because of this, I so hope to get Zhu Jun himself to appear in court in this case --- I hope that this case can be used as an example to get more procedural justice for the latecomers.
When the incident broke out in 2018, the female interns in the Zhu Jun incident submitted to the court materials for prosecuting Zhu Jun, and claimed for 50,000 yuan . On the same day, said that she also received an indictment from Zhu Jun claiming 655,000 yuan. Xianzi chose to show her face and speak. She said that she hoped to have the opportunity to be both the plaintiff and the defendant. " will risk doing this even if there is a 5% chance of winning, ". Some media made numerous calls to Zhu Jun’s agent’s mobile phone, but no one answered.
Then Zhu Jun sued Xianzi, and the dispute over the honour rights against Mai Shao was held in the People's Court of Haidian District, Beijing. Xianzi appeared, but Zhu Jun did not appear.
It is reported that Zhu Jun exchanged evidence with Mai Shao in the dispute over the right of reputation. After the trial, when Zhu Jun left the court, he was surrounded and questioned by a large number of media, but all refused to answer on the grounds of "inconvenience."
This morning, the famous CCTV host Zhu Jun involved in the sexual harassment case, Xianzi, published information on the time of the court session on his personal social platform, and said that she would attend the court on the day of the court session and hope that Zhu Jun himself will not escape.
It is reported that at the end of July 2018,A Weibo netizen named "Mai Shao" broke the news that the famous host Zhu Jun tried to sexually assault a female intern Xianzi four years ago.
In August, the Zhu military issued a statement denouncing the incident as a rumor and said that it would take legal measures to deal with it.
On October 25th, Zhu Jun v. Xianzi and "Mai Shao" a dispute over the right of reputation was held in the People's Court of Haidian District, Beijing. ,
After the sexual harassment incident, Zhu Jun’s image was greatly reduced and began to fade out of the screen, and because the results were not made public, Zhu Jun’s image was finally preserved as much as possible.
Wonderful barrage, all on the client side &xe61d;
Review>>
Weibo, a big V blogger certified as an “environmental public welfare person”, compiled the time of Zhu Jun’s alleged molestation of the female intern
z1
(Editor in charge: Chen Shaojie_b6952)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-