The F-5 fighter plane crashed on the other side. The pilot successfully parachuted but fell into the sea and drowned.

According to Taiwan media reports, on the early morning of October 29, an F-5E single-seater fighter of the Air Force Seventh Wing belonging to the Opposite Air Force Base took off for only 2 minutes when it was on a mission to the sea. Later, due to an engine failure, he made an emergency return. However, due to the strong sea wind at the time, the pilot had to abandon the plane to escape. After successfully parachuting, the pilot fell into the sea, but was entangled by the parachute's rope and was unable to launch his own rescue. The pilot was rescued and sent to the hospital for treatment, but because the pilot drowned severely, the rescue failed at 9 am that day and died. After the accident of

, all F-5 fighters on the opposite shore were grounded, and this old model was also greatly questioned. In 2011, there was an accidental collision of an F-5E fighter plane on the opposite shore into a mountain, resulting in the death of two pilots. In 1973, the United States signed an agreement with the Taiwan authorities to cooperate in the production of F-5E fighters. Until the mid-1980s, the other side produced 242 F-5E single-seater aircraft and 66 F-5F two-seater aircraft, accounting for global production. The volume is about 1/4, and it is also the world's largest F-5 fighter use area. The F-5E fighter is a dual-engine. Even if one engine fails, the other can still maintain stable flight. The failure of dual-engines is quite rare. The pilot

was sent to the hospital to rescue

. In fact, during the Hanguang exercise on the other side not long ago, there were many accidents, such as crashes and drowning accidents caused by ship rollovers. This has already explained the problem. But not long ago, the United States also announced that it had sold billions of dollars in weapons and equipment to Taiwan, including parts for F-16V fighter jets and missile systems. At this sensitive moment, the actions of the Americans undoubtedly added fuel to the fire. In the

accident, many Taiwanese netizens commented on the issue of cross-shore armaments, and pointed out that the Americans only wanted to make money and did not want to help solve the problem. In fact, the F-5 fighter plane that crashed this time is an old plane more than 40 years ago. Other countries have basically eliminated it. Nothing is strange. This has fully exposed the shortcomings of the military on the other side. In fact, if China wants to solve the problem on the other side, the military strength on the other side has never been the main obstacle.

Taiwan netizens commented on

, as some netizens said, today’s military capabilities on the other side simply cannot withstand national defense pressure and logistics systems, while old weapons and equipment, low combat capabilities, declining quality of troops, and weak fighting will are all facing the military on the other side. However, many people on the other side are still willing to be "ostriches", thinking of "many arm as a car" to block the torrent of historical development. Is this reality?

In addition, many people on the other side hope that the US military can save them, but the problem is that the Americans are very "outrageous" in buying and selling weapons, but they are really willing to trade with their biggest trading partner for a region far away from the mainland Do you tear your face completely? From the point of view of the interest-oriented American character, is this realistic?

The Chinese Navy

Not long ago, my country announced that it would impose sanctions on three US arms companies involved in arms sales to Taiwan, including Lockheed Martin , Boeing Defense, and Raytheon. There are reports that if China restricts the United States in terms of rare earths. These companies, these arms companies will suffer certain losses. For China only, if you make a fuss about our principles, what if you are the only superpower in the world?

In 1948, the Central Military Commission issued an instruction requiring troops above regiments to be named "Chinese People's Liberation Army". The term "Liberation Army" has not changed since then. Do you know why? (Subtext)