Political bread, unification dispute? Tracing the source of Wu Baochun's turmoil. Who is the initiator?

[Cover Language] Tracing the source of Wu Baochun's "unification and independence" storm, who is the real initiator, the answer is obvious.

[Text]

once won the "Bread World Olympics" champion "Taiwan's Light" Wu Baochun went to mainland China, 's first mainland store is located in Shanghai, is still in trial operation, and will officially open on the 18th (next Tuesday) of this month . What didn't expect was that Wu Baochun's name had already caught fire on both sides of the strait.

What burns this fire is not his world-renowned bread, but his words many years ago and a recent statement.

Wu Baochun is a child who grew up in a single-parent family in southern Taiwan. The story of winning the world championship is inspirational and moving. He was also made into a movie. There are stores in northern, central and southern Taiwan. Two years ago, when Wu Baochun interviewed whether to show stores to the mainland, Hong Kong and the United States, he said: “Although the Chinese market has 1.3 billion, there are more than 7 billion in the world. I will not only look at China." At that time, some Taiwanese media claimed that "ignores the temptation of the mainland, and Wu Baochun refused to show the shop." and the media rendered his speech as "dominant", using the so-called "local complex" to create "the light of Taiwan" and even I don’t know where the report started. The statement that once did not focus on China has become a model of “I will never go to the mainland if I starve to death” .

During the transfer of information, some information disappears, some information is enlarged, and some information may also be distorted.

It’s hard to say whether it was unintentional or deliberate. In short, Wu Baochun has been made into a "local hero" in the eyes of Luying. He has been "independent of Taiwan"! The new store

has been labelled as "Taiwan independence bread" before opening. Now it is planning to open in Shanghai, which also aroused dissatisfaction among netizens, and voices of resistance were heard. In order to clean up, Wu Baochun issued a statement saying that he is not "Taiwan independence." , have never made any remarks that "I will never come to China from starving to death" . In the statement, he also stated that supports the "92 Consensus" , "being a Chinese is my pride", "' "A family relationship between the two sides of the strait is my consistent attitude."

Wu Baochun clarified the full text of the statement that it is not "Taiwan independence"

No, this statement originally intended to stay away from controversy has set off a bigger storm of public opinion!

's "Taiwan Light", "vote with feet", "Across the Taiwan Strait", and "Chinese Taiwanese" statements that

held out in one hand touched the pain of Luying. Luying's celebrities and politicians fired one after another. Under the hat of "political bread", there is the so-called "contaminated copper smell" and the moral accusations and lashes of forgetting the original intention-

  • green to the bones, the "Liberty Times" said that 's "Taiwan China" sentence will once support Wu Baochun It sounds "extraordinarily harsh and uncomfortable."
  • Luying's famous mouth Zheng Hongyi said: "Master Wu wants to make money, everyone is considerate, but 's statement really hurts Taiwanese feelings."
  • Guan Biling of the "Green Committee" is not upset about Wu Baochun's saying that "China Taiwan", "the two sides of the strait are one family", "support the 1992 consensus." Five consecutive posts on Facebook blasted Wu Baochun, saying that he "loves money and does not love the country", and has less and less "moral pressure" and "unacceptable"!
  • Taoyuan Mayor Zheng Wencan, who is a member of the Democratic Progressive Party, believes that even has "92 bread" for bread, which is outrageous!

Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen made a statement against Wu Baochun, once again staged accusing "China suppresses" , she lied to "China's political distortion of economic and trade activities does exist in our daily lives. "I have seen people say almost standardized rhetoric under coercion time and time again. These are all political oppression." She also once again gave the mainland the responsibility for shutting down official cross-strait exchanges. "Oppression" is the main cause of the retrogression in cross-strait relations.

Faced with the green camp's encirclement and attack on Wu Baochun, the newly elected mayor of Kaohsiung, who had publicly stated in the election that he "supported the 1992 consensus" and "struggled the economy", Han Yu chose to stand with Wu Baochun, a representative of local enterprises. Yesterday afternoon (12.11), Han Guoyu and Wu Baochun, who was so full of public opinion, appeared in public.

Hanguo Yu mentioned that there are different views between the two sides of the strait. Wu Baochun is a simple businessman who can develop his career and create a better life without excessively touching politics. I hope the people on both sides of the strait can bless.

Wu Baochun emphasized that is a baker, and his heart of simply making bread has not changed. He enjoys making friends with bread. It is also a great honor for many young people to enter this industry because of him. Faced with the press, Wu Baochun only said "Wu Baochun" It’s Wu Baochun!” Hanoyu rounded up the field for him, “, he can only bake bread and doesn’t understand politics. Now he is so full of bags, it’s not fair to him.

, ​​but the Green Camp did not attack Wu Baochun stop. Later, Han Guoyu stated on Facebook that what he stood next to Wu Baochun was not the "Taiwan Light" he used to protect, but "a Taiwanese child struggling to survive in a pineapple field. The young man from the North drifting in pursuit of his dreams is a middle-aged businessman who has lost ground in the complex politics of .” , he did not forget to say at the end of the writing that “after this so treacherous that even the ruler himself may not be right. Before the cross-strait relations of the language, ask a business owner or baker to talk about the strength and position of Taiwan’s economy. It is the unbearable weight of Taiwan’s economy and the incomprehensible absurdity of Taiwan’s ideology.”

Indeed, Wu Baochun has fallen into the controversy of “unification and independence”. The most terrifying thing is the political figures with ulterior motives who instigated an irrational atmosphere behind this incident. Some public opinion criticized Tsai Ing-wen for reviewing the defeat for fear of not being busy enough, and seizing the opportunity, sternly stated that "Taiwanese will not succumb to China's political oppression" . To a baker so rigorously, seems that "the emperor and all my people" must follow their own "no recognition of the 1992 consensus". Isn't this also a kind of "political oppression"?

Regarding Tsai Ing-wen’s remarks in instigating “populism” and inciting “cross-strait confrontation”, Ma Xiaoguang, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council today (12.12), said at the regular press conference of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council that Master Wu’s statement expresses the correct perception And normal feelings, and the crazy siege of him by green camp politicians and "Taiwan independence" forces is political distortion and political persecution. The series of verbal criticisms against Wu Baochun by Green Camp show that they have repeatedly attempted to use political operations to create tragedy, incite confrontation, shift focus, and relieve pressure on . Ma Xiaoguang also reminded people on both sides of the strait to not dance with it. (Click on the picture to see Ma Xiaoguang’s full statement in response to this question)

When Wu Baochun was disturbed by the disturbances, the author also noticed that there are public opinions. thirty years ago, when singer Fei Xiang appeared on CCTV’s Spring Festival Gala, the subtitles showed It is "Taiwan", because the consensus is "One China" and there is no need to raise it. But thirty years later, when "China" became the other side, when the Taiwanese Lu Li'an said that she loved Taiwan and the motherland and the mainland, she was expelled from her nationality. Then who first arbitrarily excluded her love for Taiwan and opposed the mainland?

Today, in response to the concerns of Taiwanese media, how to reduce the "hostile to Taiwan" mentality of mainland netizens, to avoid letting Taiwanese people with ulterior motives see each other, Ma Xiaoguang also clarified when he reached the concept of a family relationship on both sides of the strait. What I have said is colored by people holding a specific position, and described as an expression of the "Taiwan independence" position, rather than being provoked by mainland netizens.

He also reminded Taiwan media to think about why has increased the number of opposing speeches and voices between the two sides of the strait after 2016? The root cause of is the so-called "de-sinicization" promoted by the DPP authorities, which poisoned the younger generation of Taiwan, distorted the values ​​of the Taiwan people, and led to cross-strait relations.The deterioration has triggered some emotions among mainland netizens. The initiator of was the DPP authorities. To untie the bell, you need to tie the bell. To fundamentally solve this problem, the DPP authorities must change the wrong and confrontational cross-strait policy.