We can forget and forgive, but we must know the truth: a panoramic scan of the Xiao Zhan 227 incident

Author: Yi Zhou, from the author's watercress column. Original title: The relationship between celebrities and fans and creative freedom, etc.-Thinking about the Xiao Zhan 227 incident. The

"227 Incident" has aroused widespread concern and discussion. From the initial melee, some facts have gradually become clearer, and the reasoning has become more and more clear. Although many deep-seated issues are involved, from the business model of the entertainment industry to the values ​​of conservatism and liberalism, it is still very complicated, and it is difficult to reach consensus and easy solutions. However, compliance with Chinese laws and the generally accepted moral bottom line of the society is still a prerequisite .

1. The relationship between celebrities and fans, and their responsibilities to fans

A widely circulated saying is that celebrities have the responsibility to guide fans, even "fan behavior, idol pays", that is, celebrities have not fulfilled their responsibility to guide fans. Should pay for the bad behavior of fans.

Yi Deng Rudou wrote "The Mind Control Features of Rice Circle Culture", saying, "You become a fan, but you lose also a fan. Xiao Zhan is a fan and benefits from fans. It is impossible not to pay for the bad behavior of fans. "

Phoenix Entertainment's Weibo "Ten Questions Xiao Zhan", said "Fansui idol, do you think you have set a good example?"

Yang Yue's "How to Prevent Infectious Brain Disability", said "Yes There are fans for any idol. The composition of fans is screened out by the character and personality of the idol."

Liu Run "Idol's management of fans is to convey correct values" believes that traffic stars do not have the ability to manage fans, but As the spiritual leader of fans, the most important thing is to convey positive and correct values.

Although this is not completely unreasonable, fans will be influenced by stars to a certain extent, but they all overestimate the influence of stars on fans. What we have to do is not to put too much emphasis on celebrities to lead fans in their thinking, because the other side of this is to support fans to regard celebrities as spiritual leaders and life mentors.

(1) What is the relationship between celebrities and audiences?

entertainers and audiences are basically a relationship between producers and consumers. The entertainers perform film and television dramas, sing and dance, and bring entertainment products to everyone. The audience pays, just like other products. The most famous few of the entertainers are called "stars."

In the classification of national economic industries, culture, sports and entertainment belong to the category of the tertiary industry (service industry), divided into news and publishing industry, radio, television, film and film and television recording production industry, culture and art industry, and sports industry , The five categories of entertainment industry. Stars are an important component of producers in the cultural and entertainment industry. The cultural and entertainment industry of has both educational guidance functions and consumer entertainment functions . Although we hope that it can better serve the educational function, it is not the education industry after all. The role of in education is also more in a way of entertaining and entertaining . The difference between cultural and entertainment products and general products is that their spirituality and emotion are particularly strong, and audiences are prone to project more emotions and attention. Fans are audiences who have strong feelings and are willing to invest more time and money (there is a definition, fans are people who identify with IP or celebrities and have paid behavior ). They are more likely to be influenced by celebrities. The influence that

fans receive from the celebrity is a by-product of the formation of the celebrity, not the role of the celebrity (improving skills and producing good works). If entertainers are both virtuous and well-trained, they will not only benefit their personal artistic career, but also generate positive externalities that motivate fans to be positive. If his words and deeds violate laws or socially recognized moral standards, they may have a bad influence on fans, or they may not be accepted by the society, and affect the performing arts. However, in the past, there were also some entertainers at home and abroad, and their personal virtues were beyond words. However, they still made high artistic achievements in acting and music creation.

It is necessary to separate celebrities from their works . The professions of entertainers are unique. Every one of us is "playing" ourselves, and the job of an actor needs to play other people, "soul wear" roles, sometimes it will lead to deep into the play, unable to come out, good acting skills will also cause the audience to be too involved in the play, the people do not play Minute. But remember, whether stars are acting as superheroes to save the world or heroes with noble morals, or villains who do no evil, they are all artistic creations, not their real life. Don’t over-associate the character traits in the film and TV series with yourself, or even think that it’s good at playing a certain role because he has similar experiences, "The true colors starred." For example, Tony Leung and Leslie Cheung played a gay couple in "Happy Together". We know that in reality, Tony Leung is a heterosexual and Leslie Cheung is a homosexual. If Leslie Cheung's role as a homosexual is "realistic", then is it also "realistic" for a heterosexual actor to make a heterosexual film and television series? Regardless of whether the role is close to certain personal characteristics of the star, the actor is shaped by artistic creation Character.

(2) Why is the social influence of stars so large, and the income of a few top stars is particularly high?

1. From the perspective of history and culture

In history, , drama originated from religious ritual activities, both entertaining gods and people, and gradually Separating the drama element from religious ritual activities is mainly to entertain people. In ancient times, entertainers mainly performed plays and were called "actors". They were a low-status and very disadvantaged group. Some wealthy and powerful officials can afford theatrical troupe themselves, such as the family troupe in "A Dream of Red Mansions". Although some performed for the public, they were "sponsored" by the gold masters, and sometimes they were bullied. For example, Li Bihua's "Farewell My Concubine" wrote about how to treat Cheng Dieyi from Yuan Siye to the Japanese invaders, and Ba Jin's "Autumn" written by Mr. Gao Ke'an underwent the male student Zhang Bixiu, all of which are literary works reflecting real life. .

The modern entertainment industry is different from the performances that could only be spread on a small scale in ancient times. It covers a wide audience through film and television media, and popular culture has emerged. The vast number of consumers has replaced the past few powerful classes and become the main consumer group supporting celebrities. As Walter Benjamin pointed out, mechanical replication technology that can achieve high-efficiency production becomes dominant. This is the most important condition for cultural production to shift to cultural industry and constitutes an important foundation for modern cultural production. The profit model is also gradually changing.

The entertainment industry creates stars and dreams and creates "man-made myths." The myth is surrounded by a layer of "enchantment" or "aura" (aura, in layman's terms). "The production method of mechanical copying caused the dizzy to wither and . In response, the modern cultural industry has formed a dizzy compensation mechanism. This is the basic principle of modern cultural myths. The dizzy compensation for the modern cultural industry Development is of extremely important significance. The most prominent manifestation is the interweaving of the cultural industry and the advertising industry, . Advertising is an important means of dizzy compensation for cultural products (not limited to cultural products)” (Cao Jinzhang, 2019). And this phenomenon has become more and more prominent with the development of the entertainment industry. As analyst Pei Pei wrote, "The driving force of the development of 's global entertainment industry: rich, free, and willing " "industrial efficiency has led to the increasing expansion of leisure time, and promoted the release of the demand for mass entertainment consumption in the whole society." The Engel coefficient drops, and people spend more on entertainment. may feel that fans are getting more and more crazy, but it is actually because people are getting richer and more free. therefore the influence of the star surpasses the past. The

star seems to be infinite, but because of the uncertainty of consumer preferences and too many competing products, this profession is also more vulnerable. In the past, there were very few stars. For example, the "Four Famous Danes" could be popular for decades, but now that "the talents come out from generation to generation", a successful film and television drama may become popular with an actor, and a failed film and television drama may also make it popular. An actor bears the notoriety of "box office poison". Or if people prefer to change, a celebrity is "passed".

2. From the perspective of economics

From the perspective of producers , a small number of stars have high incomes, it must be their hard work, but how popular the stars are and how high their income is cannot be explained by the "labor theory of value". It is not directly proportional to the labor, but to the audience's feelings. Each star's appearance, acting skills, and singing skills are unique and scarce, which makes the audience's acceptance and love different, forming a economic rent or producer surplus. The more red the star, the greater the rent or producer surplus. There is great uncertainty in this profession. Behind the few top stars, there are more actors and heroes who cannot become stars, and their income is not high.

From the consumer's point of view, , general products have similar use value to consumers. Consumers hope to buy them at a lower price with the same quality, but the stars bring happiness to the audience (artistic enjoyment, psychological pleasure) , That is, consumer surplus , the variance is particularly large, that is, different audiences experience the world disparity. Some viewers feelThe consumer surplus brought to him by this star is very large. It is very pleasant to watch, so he is willing to pay extra price to chase the star. There are some rational choices. For example, as long as the star plays a movie and TV, he will go to the cinema to watch or pay to watch it, or even watch it many times. It is also to thank the star for the psychological satisfaction that the star brings to him, in order to make the star It has more commercial value and will have the opportunity to shoot more film and television dramas in the future, and buy the products he endorses (determined by the ability to pay and willingness to pay, there are large sums of money to buy luxury goods, and some FMCG). But some are misled by "brainwashing" to a certain extent, as if they are "white prostitution" without extra money. Some viewers of think that the star brought him negative effects, such as ruining a drama, which is unbearable. The excess income of

stars comes from the contribution of fans. This contribution is mainly due to the voluntarily paid by consumers themselves to obtain consumer surplus (psychological satisfaction such as happiness). From the economic point of view, is similar to the producer obtaining the largest consumer surplus through complete differential pricing (for example, each seat in a small theater is priced differently due to angle and distance), but it is completely different from the classic single product Compared with pricing, there are more diverse ways (for example, various peripheral products, concerts, endorsement products).

Some people think that stars earn too much. Absalom’s "Why do people feel stupid makes sense of justice easy to overwhelm" and "It's not that you have advanced ideas, but because you don't love him like your parents." The reason why stars earn so much is written directly and humorously. "A lot of people now say that stars take too much, and it’s too easy to make money! That’s nonsense. In my opinion, stars don’t take much at all, making money is not easy at all. The industry’s pyramid is there, you How much courage and luck do you have to climb to the top?” A very important question, how many parents would like their children to choose the path of acting? Is this an easy path?

(3) Can a star become a star? Is the "spiritual leader" of fans?

Benjamin pointed out that the development of the film industry needs the "blessing" of "spiritual", the creation of "star worship" and the rendering of "star charm" to attract more audiences and box office . This is a kind of "spiritual compensation". We must clearly recognize this cultural phenomenon, and we must not regard "man-made myths" as truth and stars as gods.

Let celebrities to teach sentient beings, is to make the celebrity load cannot bear. Stars are only performers, not human soul engineers. Many celebrities of are still very young and do not have enough life accumulation and ideological quality to guide others. Their words and deeds have received such attention, and they are also responsible for guiding so many people. It is really difficult for them. The world in which stars live is very different from ordinary people, and may not be suitable for ordinary people to learn. For example, because there are too many handsome men and beauties in the entertainment industry, they face too many temptations, and their love and marital status are more difficult to stabilize than ordinary people; because of professional requirements, their clothing consumption is far more luxurious than ordinary people; some stars, especially rock singers Other creative stars sometimes use drugs to stimulate themselves in order to seek so-called artistic inspiration; because of the special requirements of the profession, fierce competition, high social attention, and high pressure, the proportion of entertainers suffering from mental illness or even suicide may be higher than that of ordinary people. .

Parents, teachers, and the entire society, the education of young people is to be charmed, to get rid of the excessive halo of celebrities, and let them realize that celebrities are a profession that is unique to , which can be seen by more people and is easy to add to the halo. ordinary people. If they have good qualities, they can of course learn and motivate themselves (for example, whether it is acting or singing or dancing, it takes great effort to stand out, suffer a lot, and those with perseverance cannot do it), but don’t put stars As a beacon of life. There have been so many outstanding figures from all walks of life throughout the ages, why do young people want to use celebrities as spiritual mentors? It is indeed better to use outstanding figures that have been settled as role models in life. However, young people are more likely to feel distanced with characters and historical figures who are too "highly complete", and stars who are similar in age and beautiful in image are more psychologically close and affectionate, and they are more likely to imitate. But sometimes stars have behavior problems such as drug abuse and cheating, and fans will feel disillusioned in their lives.

(four) can a star be responsible for the actions of fans?

is a star, thousands of people who like him say that there are fewer, the more popular the star fansmore. For example, Xiao Zhan and Wang Yibo each have 20 million 30 million people following their Weibo (equivalent to the population of a medium-sized province in China or some small European countries). To what extent can these people be influenced by celebrities? is a fan of a certain celebrity, but a small piece of the fan’s social role. is influenced by celebrities, but also because they have been influenced by their parents, teachers, and society since their birth. A very small part of it.

"Thousand-Character Wen" says that " is trained by Fu outside, and it is the mother's ". It is the responsibility of parents and teachers to educate young people. If a person is not well educated in the society of his parents and teachers, can a celebrity educate well? If a person commits a crime, even his parents will not be sentenced to sentence. The person claims that he likes a celebrity and the celebrity is responsible for his actions Fans chase this star today and chase that star tomorrow, chasing multiple stars at the same time, and have to formulate a star accountability system to divide the responsibilities? Some netizens said that Jacky Cheung’s concert caught several wanted criminals, but these people are Genuine fans, risking being caught, have to come to the concert. Is it necessary to catch Jacky Cheung and sit down?

If some fans' words and deeds are beyond reasonable scope, harming the interests of celebrities or others. It is these fans who should be criticized, condemned or even punished first, rather than blame the celebrities for attracting and failing to educate their fans.

Of course, because of the increasing influence of celebrities, celebrities should also have higher requirements for their own behavior first, so as not to have a negative social impact. Secondly, the fans should be guided as positively as possible within their own ability.

Some celebrities are straightforward and criticize the bad words and actions of fans. This should be affirmed and encouraged. But each celebrity has a different personality, and has a different attitude towards fans and ways of interacting with fans. If hopes that the celebrity will have a great influence on the fans, what should he do if he leads in the wrong direction? The correct way is still to reduce the celebrity’s influence .

further said that in society, who has the ability to guide the thoughts and actions of tens of millions of people? Even many experts and scholars, their opinions often cause great controversy. Can celebrities have a higher level of thinking than experts and scholars? What a real thinker can give people is spiritual inspiration, not specific actions.

In short, don't expect any star to be the "spiritual leader" of fans. The vast majority of people in the world are not qualified for this.

(5) Are all stars a symbol created by capital?

Many people say that “capital makes stars” and think which stars are popular because of the large capital support behind them. I also analyzed the characteristics of the modern entertainment industry above. Stars cannot do without the support of capital. But every person is unique after all, and one's differences and initiative cannot be ignored at any time. For example, in a combination, some people are more popular and some are relatively less popular. After flying solo, the difference between good and bad development is more obvious. Some actors can't be supported by capital, unless they have a special background, capital will not support Ah Dou who cannot be supported. Whether

film and television dramas become popular (and whether the actors are popular), there are many accidents. Of course, the screenwriters, directors, actors, and the entire crew invest seriously and have a large capital investment. Most of the time it is the prerequisite for success, but sometimes small productions It will also be popular. Some big productions have invested a lot of money, but the audience just didn't buy it, and the box office failed miserably. cannot do without capital, but capital is not omnipotent. The value of

star lies in its uniqueness , which brings people a unique aesthetic feeling. The personal charm of a star is firstly derived from his professional ability in acting and singing, presenting works that bring artistic enjoyment to people. Secondly comes from the charm of his personal character and connotation.

said, "You become a fan, and you lose a fan. Xiao Zhan is a fan of the fans and gains the fans." This is a mistake about the root cause of the star's success. How did fans get attracted? Take Xiao Zhan, for example, he became popular because he played "Chen Qing Ling" and his fans skyrocketed, not because of his many fans, he played "Chen Qing Ling". Later he participated in "Our Song" and circled another wave of fans. After all, it depends on acting and singing skills. Another example is Yi Yang Qianxi, because last year's performance of "The Twelfth Hour in Chang'an" and "Young You" turned many people into fans. Which star's success or failure basically depends not on the work but on the fans? fans first come because of the work. Because the works are interested in celebrities, I will learn more about his personality and experience. Indeed, now "fansUnder the "silk economy", fans will have a certain reactionary force on celebrities. For example, some celebrities announce their love affair and get married, which leads to fans' fanfare and decline in commercial value. However, whether the celebrity can come back and recover, ultimately depends on the work. Butterflies come. "Fans come and go, and they are not stable. The magnetism that attracts them is still in the strength of stars.

now has the so-called selling "personality". Different "personality" can attract fans with different preferences to a certain extent, but "Personal design" alone cannot attract fans for a long time. If the team is used to create an unreal "personal design", there is also a risk of "personal design" being shattered. And now social media is too developed and celebrity exposure is extremely high. Through his own social media, he took the initiative to speak out, was interviewed and filmed secretly, appeared on reality TV shows, and his words and deeds were placed under a microscope and magnifying glass. If the celebrities could disguise their true character and emotions at all times under such circumstances , It’s also very difficult. Sometimes being over-concerned can cause the celebrity’s words to be over-interpreted or even taken out of context and misinterpreted. Is it necessary for us to judge a celebrity’s words and deeds in such a 360-degree manner? No one is perfect. Every sentence of death is so great that it can be made into inspirational quotations?

Under the commodity economy and market economy, people are commoditized, materialized, and symbolized. But we should still respect the value of human beings. People can hardly avoid becoming tools. Value can be used, but people are the ultimate goal after all. It is not a correct attitude to praise a star as a god or belittle it.

2. Problems with fans and fans

(1) Problems with fans

Because of the strong emotion brought by the entertainment industry, the emotions of fans can sometimes be too intense, to an irrational level, and even take out-of-bounds or extreme behavior. The most common fan behavior is to show someone else's favorite star. This kind of mood is understandable. It is similar to reading a good book and wanting to recommend it to others. I want more people to know and like it. However, it is easy to be disgusted by Amway who does not care. It is better to have the same hobbies. When the relationship is strong, you must restrain yourself and take your own measures. The bad behaviors of

fans include attacking or harassing/harassing the celebrity, assaulting other people, tearing each other between CP fans and Weifans, disliking star marriages, etc. Celebrities are often victims. Few of them can stop, and most of them can’t.

1. attack/harass the celebrities themselves. Yang Yue cited a few extreme examples in the article-celebrities were shot by their fans. On December 8, 1980, John Lennon, the greatest rock musician of the last century, was shot by his fans when he approached Lennon just for an autograph. The author of is not logically self-consistent. He said, "There are idols and fans." The composition of fans is screened out by the idol’s character and personality. "The fan who shot John Lennon was screened out by Lennon's "Character and Personality"? In order to prove this sentence, the author of gave some examples, including my own example, "As a veteran DJ, I also have A huge number of fans, many people have followed me for more than 20 years, but they rarely have exaggerated expressions, even come to participate in my activities, dare not get close to say I like you". The difference between

is, First, the number of fans, the number of fans of top-rated stars is huge, even if most of them are rational, there will be problems with one-hundred-thousandths of irrationality. Second, the attraction of stars, bet Sharon analyzed in "Send You A Compassionate Hat" that Guo Degang's fans are not as radical as Xiao Zhan's fans, "The main problem is the face." This is humorous, and the truth is true. The more beautiful is, the more attractive it is. (Including personal sexual charm and artistic charm of works) stars, fans are more likely to become fanatic. young stars usually have more fans in the younger age ratio (some stars can be loved by all ages), older stars Celebrities usually have older fans and relatively few irrational behaviors. This is not an idol’s character and personality issue. Even the works of art arouse strong emotions and are a sign of their success. Such feelings often extend As for the actors. Many stars, including Xiao Zhan, have a serious problem with "illegal meals". The stars are deeply hurt and exhausted physically and mentally. Many have issued statements condemning and reminding them, but there are always such irrational fans.

may be The charm of beauty is too great, and it is human nature to love beauty. In ancient times, Wei Jie was seen killingHelen, the warrior, the king's daughter buys a smile. The film and television dramas produced by the modern entertainment industry are blessed with plot persuasiveness, bringing the handsome men and beauties that only a few people could see in ancient times to everyone, and it is not surprising that it arouses enthusiasm.

2. Attack other stars. has always been common. A classic example is that in the 1980s, Leslie Cheung and Alan Tam fans pinched each other. At that time, they had been famous for a long time, should they have a mature team? They were also very distressed, and eventually announced that they would no longer accept awards or withdraw from the music scene. Stars themselves often have very good relationships with other stars or at least have no grievances. From normal acting cooperation to interaction, they can be criticized by fans as being hot. Even in a combination, there are fans who like one and attack other stars. People's feelings and preferences will be different. The so-called radish vegetables, each has their own love, one person's delicacy, others' poison, drowning three thousand, only take a scoop. This is understandable. Variety is the source of happiness. No star can unify everyone's preferences. Life is short, and it is not enough to spend on people and things you like. Why should you spend time and energy attacking those you don’t like.

3. CP fan and Wei fan tear each other. also had it before, and it was more prominent among the fans of Xiao Zhan Wang Yibo (still a problem that caused concern due to too much base). It is understandable to like their CP. The two of them have high value to join the play with empathy, true feelings, and mutual attraction. It is pleasing to watch together. But the extreme CP fan is a little bit irrational. You must know that Wei Wuxian and Lan Wangji are forever. Xiao Zhan and Wang Yibo are just colleagues working on short-term projects. Of course, they can become good friends because of their colleagues, but actors. I also want to continue to play other roles with other actors in CP. In an opponent's play, two people must be evenly matched and achieve each other. Those who are only fans and poisons, like one, and when the other is mentioned, they don't share the same meaning, and it is unreasonable.

4. I don't like celebrities getting married . Acting star is a profession, which profession is not allowed to get married? The psychological reason is that celebrities carry fans' sexual fantasies. But be sober, liking celebrities is different from liking people around you in reality. The latter is likely to develop into your spouse, and the proportion of the former becoming your spouse is close to impossible. If you like a star, he brings you beautiful and happy enjoyment, don't you want him to be happy? Because the star does not like him when he gets married, it is too naive and selfish. Also star A chooses star B as his spouse. Those who like A will scold B because they don't like B. This is also really strange, it's not you who choose your spouse. What right do you have to openly criticize others for choosing a spouse (who can understand who you think is worthy or not)?

But these people do not chase stars, and they may be paranoid in other ways. First of all, you have to be a sensible and sensible person in order to be a sensible fan.

Many fans' paranoia and fanaticism are social and educational issues. The focus of parents and teachers for young people is to cultivate a correct outlook on life, world outlook and values, basic principles of being in the world, such as observing the law, respecting life, respecting individual choices, being polite, "do not do to others what you do not want," "Gentleman Communicate without making bad noises" and have independent thinking ability, and cannot become "rabbit crowds" without brains following the trend.

agrees with Yang Yue's article "How to Prevent Contagious Brain Disability", "The root cause of brain disability is that you have never seen the world." His vision and mind are not broad enough, and the pattern is not big enough, so he is paranoid. Die, we cannot respect diverse choices. Now in this society, there are too many people with incorrect views, and they have brain disabilities on various issues. It's more than just star chasers. This time, the users of the AO3 platform cast their anger on Xiao Zhan. Various curses and insults have been shocking. It has reached the level of online violence, and it is even more paranoid. As Le Pen wrote in "The Mob", "Anonymous groups, and the resulting law does not blame the public, so that the sense of responsibility that always restrains the individual has completely disappeared."

(2) Problems in the rice circle

Fans like a star, mostly spontaneous and scattered, and now form an organizational "rice circle". There are also many analyses on this, and some believe that it has been used by commercial capital to form a hierarchical control relationship, mobilizing organizations to vote on rankings, buy endorsements, and anti-criminal. Liu Run analyzed that the rice circle is a self-organizing . The power of self-organization is very powerful. There is also a positive side. For example, Fanquan management is the best at fundraising, so Fanquan is very efficient in doing charity for stars. In the new crown lungDuring the epidemic, the star's rice circle donated a lot of money and materials, which were praised. But this kind of power can sometimes cause harm to fans and people outside the restaurant circle. On average, the members of the

fan circle are relatively young. Even if the college students are older, many of them are elementary and middle school students. Personally, I don’t agree with ’s voting on the rankings, which is a waste of time and money. The organization of this ranking list is to a certain extent based on emotional kidnapping and excessively squeezing the consumer surplus of fans. An actor and singer should speak based on their works .

However, should voting on the rankings be banned? Under the market economy, I am willing to fight and suffer. It seems that it cannot be prohibited by administrative power. Moreover, whether it is a child or an adult, there is always nowhere to vent the feelings, time, and energy, and they will find other fun after blocking this channel. If you are not allowed to chase stars, what about playing games? How about spending money to buy game props? What about other preferences that do more harm than good, such as smoking and drinking? Just like Dayu's control of water, it is difficult to restrict too much. This is especially true in the Internet age. How to rectify and guide the rice circle culture has indeed become a problem. This is closely related to the current changes in the profit model of the entertainment industry.

The profit model of the modern entertainment industry is highly tied to the "flow" of stars and personal market value. Behind it is capital interests, and even involves operations such as performance betting, which magnifies the success or failure of stars and film and television works economically. So sometimes there is a need to organize a meal circle and guide public opinion. This kind of guiding public opinion sometimes promotes the advantages of celebrities and film and television dramas, and sometimes discredit the celebrities or film and television dramas out of the need to suppress competitors. In addition to fans or fan circle organizations that have bad behaviors due to emotional and cognitive problems, also has hired black fans to cover up their behavior for commercial purposes as fans, which makes the fan group mixed (see Wang Mei’s What It’s a professional black powder and its impact"). "Professional black powder" has become a cancer of the entertainment industry, corrupting the entertainment ecology and even the social atmosphere, and requires the state to pay attention to, manage and rectify it.

The impact of capitalization of the entertainment industry has deepened, which is also caused by the rising status of the entertainment industry in the national economy, the increasing investment costs of film and television productions, and the increase in peripheral derivative benefits such as advertising. How to increase the investment in the entertainment industry and reduce the problem of putting effort beyond the work caused by excessive capitalization is also a need for research.

(3) Discussion of two nouns:

1. "Traffic star". originally just meant that the popularity of stars was very high, but now it sometimes seems to have a derogatory meaning. In fact, the digitization of "traffic", is inevitable in the era of digital economy where everything is quantified and measured and spoken by data. The past stars of are widely loved by the public, and they can also be regarded as the "traffic stars" of that era when they receive letters from the "flaky" audience. I believe that if the audience had the opportunity to vote on the list, they would actively participate and express their love and support. If there is no attractive ability, how does "traffic" come from? Of course, "traffic stars" must also continue to improve their skills (acting and singing skills), win the recognition of audiences with their work and become excellent actors Only with singers can we have a longer artistic life.

We don’t need to be too old and thin. We think that the young actors and singers are not as strong as in the past, and we need to give them time and opportunities to grow and prove themselves. There are many excellent actors at home and abroad who have changed from idol group to powerful group, and the transformation is successful. Dragon TV’s “Our Song” program allows “predecessor singers” and “new singers” to learn from each other on the same stage. Both generations of singers feel that they can learn a lot from each other, creatively adapt classic songs, and bring beautiful audio-visual enjoyment to the audience. .

2. "white whoring". The word is a kind of vulgarization of language and improper expansion of the meaning of the word. It may be that the entertainment industry capital deliberately guided the formation of this concept in order to encourage fans to spend money. The term "prostitution" is originally meant to be one-to-one, and the consumer will have to pay a high cost, but in the modern film and television industry, after film and television works are produced, the marginal cost of increasing the number of viewers is close to zero. Strictly speaking, there is no so-called "white prostitution." The audience is valuable not only money but also time (opportunity cost). The so-called "attention economy", the audience spends time and attention to look at an actor (will reduce to look at others), are all contributions. And from the beginning of "white whoring" (just watch without spending money), it is possible to like and turn fans. The length of time spent by viewers watching a star is highly positively correlated with its commercialization ability.

The audience's love for a star and whether they are willing to pay extra money should be a personal act, and should not be forced to fall into collective blind obedience. Moreover, the more time and money that is a collective organization in the fan circle that goes to the rankings and buys endorsements, the more time and money that fans pay for the surplus of consumers in a normal state, the fans will be unwilling to pay and misunderstand I have a certain right to the celebrity, beyond the evaluation and discussion of his works to the extent of interfering in his life and work. Even once has turned off fans and turned black, the intensity of its intensity is also terrible.

In short, the public loves stars, rooted in their love of beauty and art. A certain degree of star-chasing is normal entertainment consumption, while the modern entertainment industry is fueled by commercial interests and creates power for stars. However, society needs correct guidance, individuals need rational understanding, and control the love of celebrities within a reasonable limit. The "Buddha nature" is a bit better. It can't get mad, take up too much time and money, and affect normal life.

3. About the AO3 platform and creative freedom

(1) About the AO3 platform

, I found some information about the AO3 platform (combined with the translation of Chinese and English materials). Beyond the dash is my comment: the birth of

AO3 : May 2007 At the end of the month, LiveJournal (hereinafter referred to as LJ, founded in 1999), a blog and social networking site that gathered a large number of doujin authors (hereinafter referred to as LJ, was established in 1999, and was bought by the Internet service company Six Apart in San Francisco, USA in 2005) to provide LiveJournal services company Danga Interactive. Innocence put pressure on it, accusing it of pedophilia and child obscene content. The website operator closed the blog accounts of about 500 doujin creators with the tags of rape, incest, or pedophilia without warning (stripped through), known as "Strikethrough". On August 3, LJ once again banned some accounts without warning. These usernames were bolded and were called "Boldthrough". LJ explained that the decision to ban the account was made by its Abuse Prevention Team. They are authorized to decide whether works with erotic descriptions have enough artistic value to be retained (containing enough serious artistic value to offset the sexual nature of the material).

A website called FanLib was created at this time to recruit fellow authors, but the profit orientation of the website and the ownership of the copyright of novels using the website have raised many questions. In order to seek a creation-based publishing channel, the fan authors finally established a non-profit organization for Transformative Works (OTW) after discussion; this organization aims to record and preserve fan culture and works. OTW created the AO3 portfolio in October 2008. Warriors for Innocence stated that it wants to end the liberal idiocy on LJ because children are watching these blogs and are affected by unethical behavior. —— can see that some of the content in the fan works has caused controversy, not only in China.

OTM is committed to “proactively, adopt an innovative, multi-element approach to protect fan works, defends fan creations that are challenged by the law , and avoids the commercialization of fan creations."- shows that many fan works have encountered legal proceedings. .

AO3's principles : "AO3 works library adheres to the principle of maximum inclusiveness and minimum content review of , which has led to a lot of controversial content in its hosted content . According to the AO3 works library policy and abuse chairman Marty Bao According to Lehrs, only a portion (1,150) of the works submitted to the website were marked as'distasteful' by users. Stacey Langtaki, a volunteer on the Legal Committee of the Recreation Organization, said: "The mission of the Recreation Organization Is to advocate second creation works, not just the works we like品’. ""As long as the content is legal, AO3 Works Library allows users to publish works of any subject matter. The reason for formulating this policy is considered to be the response of AO3 Works Library to other popular fan works websites. For example: LiveJournal once banned the publication of pornographic novels ; FanFiction.Net banned multiple types of novels, especially writing works under the names of authors who expressly opposed the second creation. "-It can be seen that AO3 is the least censored and the largest scale of its kind. How can works published under the principle of "least content censorship" comply with the laws of various countries including China?

(2) About " In the novel

about the "Falling" and the AO3 website that caused the incident, many articles are biased and misleading. For example, the widely circulated article "Xiao Zhan Fans Attack AO3 Begins and Ends" states that "there was intense activity in various circles. Cultural discussion: Zhanjie and prostitutes are originally literary motifs. If "prostitutes" shouldn't appear in creation, then at least half of the world's masterpieces will no longer exist. "Someone cited a bunch of world literary masterpieces with prostitutes, such as "The Decameron", "The Miserable World", "La Traviata" and so on. Others said that the same humanities are also very common. For example, "A Journey to the West" is a fan of "Journey to the West". Wen, etc. What needs to be pointed out is the problem of "The Fall":

First, it is not whether prostitutes can appear in the creation, but whether it is appropriate to use the actor's name to create the same humanities. The prostitutes in these famous works , Which is the name of a real celebrity?

This aspect of legal analysis, such as the China News Weekly’s Weibo interview with legal professionals to analyze "what are the legal risks of creating fan works", "the fandom holds high the banner of freedom." That's right? The articles such as "Da Wang is a cat" have more cases and analysis in the article "A deep dive on the legal issues of the fan work "The Fall" that caused the big incident in the rice circle". The

fan art includes the use of literary and artistic characters and real people. There are two types of names to create. The former, if the literary works have passed the copyright protection period, there is no legal risk, such as "Journey to the West", otherwise there is legal risk. For example, in 2000, the writer Jiang Nan used Jin Yong’s works in Qiao Feng, etc. 66 The name of his personal property created "The Boy Here". In 2016, Jin Yong was sued by Jin Yong for a claim of 5 million yuan, which took 2 years. In the end, Jiangnan did not constitute copyright infringement but constituted unfair competition. Jin Yong received a total of 1.88 million yuan in compensation. Legal person Explain that "If you create with a real person as a prototype, you may be suspected of infringing on the privacy and reputation of the other party, and if the work contains elements such as obscenity, violence, blood, etc., it is suspected of illegal crime." From the above foreign websites, there are Strictly managed fanworks websites (such as FanFiction.Net) are strictly prohibited from writing works under the names of authors who express their opposition to the second creation. At present, most Chinese authors do not expressly oppose them. Some people suggest that in the future, novel authors will declare that they are against secondary creation.

Secondly, whether this novel is suspected of being “obscene”. Some people say that this novel does not write Xiao Zhan as a prostitute, but as a male with gender cognitive impairment, and the identity is a hair salon girl, and The relationship between the other male protagonists is love rather than money, and it also reflects social reality. Those who support the freedom of creation of this novel can look for this novel and think about whether they want to name themselves or their family members. , Was used in such literary creations. Where is the boundary of literary creation freedom, especially novels involving erotic descriptions, has always been a complicated issue. For example, "Mrs. Chatterley's Lover" was once a banned book, but it was later recognized It is an excellent literary and artistic work. Even from the perspective of artistic creation, literary and artistic works can be divided into superior and inferior. For the overall artistic integrity, there is a small amount of erotic content, or it is full of large-scale erotic content.

author uses Xiao Zhan The name may be out of affection on the one hand, on the other hand it may be for the purpose of attracting readers. In civil disputes, the people will not prosecute the officials. It is fine if Xiao Zhan does not sue, and some people want Xiao Zhan to apologize. Then Xiao Zhan is Should I apologize to the original author and encourage infringement?

(3) Regarding the freedom of creation

has caused great controversy on the quality of works on the AO3 platform and whether it should be sealed in China. "I have crawled 10,000 articles and told you what AO3 is. "The analysis post of "Jin Ping Mei" summarizes the proportion of sensitive words in the AO3 classificationThe average ratio between the public and the youth of the system shows how the AO3 Chinese content scale is. Some people think that AO3 is its "spiritual home", which embodies the freedom of creation, while others are shocked that teenagers regard such platforms as "spiritual homes" and believe that the country should block similar foreign websites even if it is not blocked for reporting. .

has an evaluation that points out why some Chinese people like AO3. "AO3 itself is not a website dedicated to pornography. It is a large-scale global storage site created by doujin (the basic principle of the website is to tag and write warnings). There will be a certain description of sex. The reason why this platform is It is widely accepted by fandoms in China because the censorship system of various online literary websites in China is very strict. , ranging from castration words to large ideas, and AO3 provides a relatively free environment. Let creators feel as comfortable as possible. AO3’s grading system is by far the best. Although it has many loopholes, at least a complete grading system including labels, reminders, warnings, etc. may not be possible after it is banned. Containing illegal content, on the contrary, will cause these content to be more harmful because they are published on unrated web pages." The problem with may be that China's formal large-scale literary websites have too strict censorship standards and lack a grading system, making some authors and readers reasonable The demand cannot be met.

From a legal point of view, some articles on the AO3 platform have reached the level of “obscene articles” in the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law", and transmission should be punished. However, some people think that AO3 also has excellent fan literature on the grounds of "bad law and illegality." It is an infringement of creative freedom by simply scribbling on many things (because the AO3 platform is not in our country, and it adheres to the principle of least censorship. It is impossible to rectify according to Chinese laws, and technically it may not be possible to block specific articles).

This kind of controversy involves values. It can be said that it is a dispute between cultural liberalism and cultural conservatism. The boundary of freedom, whether some descriptions in literary works are reasonable artistic needs or meet the standards of "obscene" can be discussed. But this kind of dispute still needs to be within the framework of the rule of law. Law professor Yu Xingzhong pointed out in the article "The rule of law is a civilized order", "The rule of law in requires moral, ethical, emotional and ideological assistance. In a civilized society, the rule of law cannot exist independently. The spiritual wisdom condensed in the long history of mankind They should also participate in it and complement the rule of law. However, these spirits cannot override the rule of law , otherwise they will return to the state of the rule of man.” Is the identification of infringement and obscenity in relevant Chinese laws and regulations to the extent of draconian laws (Internet There are some deletions on the post, to the point of being hated by people. But this is not the same as deleting an article that meets the "obscene" standard.)? Some people abuse the "bad law and illegal", but it is completely inconsistent with the rule of law. The point of spirit.

4. Regarding reporting

Many people say that Xiao Zhan fans should not report, analogy saying that two children fighting should not sue the teacher. This sentence itself is wrong. Children’s fights have varying degrees, and not all of them can be resolved by themselves. What if it reaches the level of school violence? Some children themselves do not have the ability to fight back? What's more, this matter involves the boundary of creative freedom, whether it is legal infringement, The country’s management of cultural undertakings and the standards for "anti-pornography and illegality" are very complicated, far beyond a fight between two children. Some people at

said, “For example, there is wine on the shelves of a supermarket. Someone rushes in and not only smashes the wine bottle, but also seals up the supermarket, just because minors cannot drink the wine.” If a fan blocks the platform through hackers, That "someone" is a fan. But in the 227 incident, it was not a "supermarket" that fans had blocked. Fans reported to the Cyberspace Administration of China and the Anti-pornography Office. Articles such as "The Secret of Xiao Zhan Incident: Public Opinion Mixed Stations Under the Absence of the Truth" have been clarified. Fans are not reporting the "supermarket" on the AO3 platform, but the report is linked to AO3 Weibo account for this article.

Bi Zhifei's views on reporting AO3 are quite reasonable. Zheng Fan's article in the "Procurator Daily" also pointed out that " is the duty of every citizen to fight against illegal activities, and it is worthy of affirmation of . Some fan works under the banner of fan, actually spread illegal content such as obscenity. As a law-abiding Citizens, reporting this is not only correct, but also worthy of encouragement. Therefore, should objectively evaluate the reporting behavior of Xiao Zhan fans. I personally think that onlyIf it is not a false accusation, it should be positive . Since AO3 is an overseas website, although it uses a grading system to mark the erotic grades of some works, my country does not have a relevant grading system. Therefore, some works on the AO3 platform are indeed very controversial and may have violated Related laws and regulations of our country. We have no law enforcement powers on overseas websites, so taking measures to block the spread in accordance with the law is a foreseeable result. Therefore, some netizens believe that Xiao Zhan’s fans should not report, and personally think that it is untenable legally. ”

There are two ways to resolve disputes over any problem: private remedy and public remedy. The former includes self-negotiation and self-retaliation. The latter includes complaints, reports, and court prosecutions to administrative agencies.

, A customer suspects that the quality of the goods is poor or counterfeit. In the former, he can complain to the merchant. If the merchant is satisfied, it will be resolved. If the merchant is not satisfied, he can also complain to the Administration for Consumer Rights Protection such as the Industrial and Commercial Bureau. The latter, he told the merchant that it was useless, so he had to complain directly to the administrative department. Or, like Wang Hai, he could go directly to the court to sue.

is like a person’s relative who was killed and beat the enemy himself. Even if it is killed, it is private relief. Even in ancient times, it is not allowed to be allowed, and modern society under the rule of law does not allow it. It must be resolved through the courts.

Regarding the issue of Xiao Zhan’s humanities written on the platform, private power Remedies include communicating with authors to withdraw, communicating with platforms, writing articles to denounce boycotts, etc. Public remedies include reporting, that is, lodge a complaint with the relevant department, or go to the court to sue the author for infringement of personal reputation rights, etc.

Remedies are unreasonable. For example, the court thinks that the murderer should be sentenced to death, but the court considers various factors and only sentenced it to life or a few years, or the administrative department should only block the problematic documents instead of blocking the platform. Even the text should not be blocked because it is an artistic creation. The former can be appealed, and the latter should have been able to apply for administrative reconsideration, or to sue the administrative department for improper law enforcement, or even violations of laws and administrative regulations, which violate the rights of citizens. But China , is indeed a serious lack of public remedies, and there is no way to sue. This has also led to people’s opinions on the exercise of the right to report, which is a legitimate citizen supervision. If everyone does not believe that public power can make reasonable judgments, That is a manifestation of the "Tacitus Trap." The key to is to improve public power, the transparency and credibility of referees, rather than criticizing the whistleblower. The key to the correctness of the

report is whether the report is true or fabricated. For example, a A person did receive a bribe of 1 million yuan, and someone reported it. The reporter should be affirmed; but a person did not accept bribes, and the reporter fabricated the bribery information in order to retaliate against him. This report must be wrong and serious. It may constitute the "crime of false accusation and framing" in the criminal law. The most contemptuous report of

is the whistleblower. The whistleblower is to put a person in a very small circle, such as family, friends, class, no more than a few or dozens of people Within the scope of, what you say will be reported to the official. And for an article like "The Fall" that has been publicly disseminated through Weibo, it has exceeded the minority and cannot be regarded as a whistleblower.

5. About who should stand up and what should be done

Knowing that Shangyan pupil Xuetujun wrote Xiao Zhan "has made history and became the first person in the history of China's Internet, who did not take the initiative to make a mistake, but was nailed to the fire. Frame idol. "Previously, celebrities who had reputational risk incidents that affected their personal development made their own mistakes. Drugs, cheating, prostitution, politically incorrect statements, etc.. Xiao Zhan has always been evaluated as a very good-quality and positive star (see "People" magazine, the second issue of 2020, "Xiao Zhan has a wilderness in his heart"). His fault, it is said that he did not guide his fans well and did not express his attitude. This article focuses on the analysis of the problem of not guiding the fans. He just became popular. How long does he and his team lack experience, and maybe the experienced ones can handle it better. What should he say? No matter what he says, it is impossible to satisfy all parties, and he is the biggest one in this matter. The victim, someone should apologize to him, not he should stand up and say something. Some fans of

have problems with the culture of the rice circle (not only Xiao Zhan's fan circle), and there may be problems with the management of cultural entertainment , And the users of the AO3 platform cast their anger on him, The implementation of cyber violence is even more problematic. It's just that Xiao Zhan became popular last year, and all kinds of coincidences happened to erupt here. It is possible that investigative reporters were busy investigating more important matters during the epidemic and failed to investigate and clarify the matter in time. The people who eat melons have some ambiguity and follow the trend. From dissatisfaction with fans irrationally chasing stars, to dissatisfaction with network administrators deleting posts and restricting freedom of speech, they are all poured out on Xiao Zhan. Just like the crowd in the movie "Wonderful West East" (played by Zhang Ziyi) Wang Minjia, everyone stepped on a foot, simply put to death and hurry.

Now it seems that the report itself is completely legal, and the report is that the Weibo account is not the AO3 platform. Whether the AO3 platform has been blocked by the relevant national administrative department is very doubtful (some people analyze that it may be too large to see it, not because it is blocked). I think the most important thing to stand up is for the relevant administrative departments to explain whether AO3 is blocked because it does not comply with relevant Chinese laws and regulations. If so, you can discuss whether these regulations are reasonable, whether law enforcement is reasonable, and how they should be improved. This is the right way to discuss AO3 issues. Unfortunately, the relevant departments may not stand up.

requires media with professional ethics to further investigate the truth of the 227 incident, why the situation of the participants has intensified, and what forces are driving it. We need more real experts and scholars to reflect on the 227 incident and discuss the issues that are highlighted and can be discussed for improvement in the 227 incident. For example, how does build a society where citizens have the spirit of the rule of law and morality, how to educate young people to establish correct values, how to correctly chase stars, whether the business model of the entertainment industry needs to be adjusted, how to manage the culture and entertainment industry, and the boundary between freedom of artistic creation and freedom of speech , Whether it is necessary to establish a classification system for literary and artistic works (film and literature), and how to prevent online violence .

Those who harm celebrities with extreme words and actions (for example, burning other people’s photos are called "cremation") and resist their commercial endorsements that harm the celebrity’s financial interests. Shouldn’t they be educated, reflect on, and apologize? ? It is impossible for a celebrity to sue all those who infringe on his rights, who will protect his legal rights?

The above-mentioned related issues, to name just one example, are about the freedom of artistic creation. For example, for literary works about homosexuality, the World Health Organization removed homosexuality from the list of diseases in 1990, and China removed homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses in 2001. Excellent film and television works such as "Philadelphia Story", "Brokeback Mountain", and "Friends" in the United States all reflect the situation of homosexual people and even take homosexuality as the theme. In the “General Rules for the Review of Online Audiovisual Program Content” released by China in 2017, “representing and displaying abnormal sexual relationships and sexual behaviors, such as incest, homosexuality, sexual perversion, sexual assault, sexual abuse, and sexual violence, etc.” are defined as The content of "rendering obscene pornography and vulgar and low-level interest" lists homosexuality and has not yet been revised (someone has made comments, such as the article "Resisting the "General Rules for the Review of Online Audiovisual Program Content" Discriminating against homosexuality and calling for equal rights for LGBT groups"). The director of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television once explained that "this subject matter is not untouchable. The key depends on whether the theme is to promote, admire and beautify, or whether it is really set for the needs of the story and the performance of the characters." In general, the relevant administrative departments have too much discretion in the management of film and television dramas, which makes creators and film and television investors face great uncertainty. For example, in 2019, the sudden release of the "Restriction on Antiquities Order" prevented many costume dramas from being broadcast, and investment was in vain. In fact, the quality of a play may not have a direct relationship with its subject matter and era. Many aspects of human nature have not changed much from ancient times to the present. Costume dramas can also be used to compare the past to the present, praising the beauty of human nature, and flogging the ugly . Dramas with realistic themes may also be made up randomly, divorced from reality, and have incorrect views. Market risks are predictable by investors, but the risks brought about by this administrative power are difficult for investors to predict and bear.

"Chen Qingling" asks "Which is black and white, which is right and which is evil", Xiao Zhan really encountered the real version of the poor and strange roads and never sleeps. In "Chen Qing Ling", Wei Wuxian was unjustified 16 years later. It was a fairy tale novel that can be reborn and will not grow old. But in reality, individuals are very fragile, and a person only has a lifetime. hopes that we can protect everyone's legal rights and respect everyone's life that cannot be repeated. Postscript of

:

1. Regarding whether the discussion can change people’s views

After this article is published, leave a message and privately write to mineQuite a few, some thank and agree with my thinking, some criticize and attack, and some think it’s useless to say anything about it, and it’s impossible to change anyone’s point of view. Just wait for it to pass quietly, and some say it’s not. Right and wrong, only position.

"There is no right from wrong, only standpoint", falling into the "consistent group spirit" and unwilling to distinguish right from wrong is the most terrible thing. "Human is a reed capable of thinking." Human beings are rational beings. How can they be human without thinking and irrational? Even though it is difficult for us to reach absolute truth, relative truth still exists. It's not advisable to start a word and talk nonsense because of others. Both parties in the original dispute (Xiao Zhan fans, AO3 users) and third parties (passersby, researchers, media, etc.) need to have more rational discussions, clearer facts, relatively objective and fair judgments, and face problems Constructive suggestions for improvement.

Whether the discussion is useful. You can read two articles

1. Discussions can change people's views

Say's law and Keynes's law-which one is more accurate?

2. Discuss beliefs that can’t change people’s views

mystical attributes

Caixin Wang Shuo wrote in the “Public Opinion Food Chain”, “Enlightenment is called enlightenment by influencing people who do not have opinions to form opinions; persuading dissidents to agree with your opinions , That’s called convert. "

People who don’t have a clear view of a matter are more likely to be guided by the point of view of an article, if the point of view seems reasonable. New information can also significantly change people's perceptions. For example, when one news comes out that someone has a problem, it has become a source of criticism, and another news comes out with hidden information. The "reversal" of everyone's opinion is based on the new information.

People who have a firm view of something, and this view is rooted in their own values ​​or even belief, which is more difficult to be changed by an article. People often selectively accept information, accept what is in line with and consolidate their views, and ignore what does not conform to their views. But this cannot be absolute. It depends on whether this person has an open mind, has a higher level of critical thinking, knows to examine one's own views, and if they are really wrong, they can adjust and correct their views instead of sticking to their old views forever . We can see that the opinions of many thinkers in the early and middle and later stages are consistent and varied, and even the later self criticizes and denies the earlier self. We ordinary people, 40 years old and 20 years old, will have the same view of the same thing? Even yesterday's me and today's me will be different. If a person's thinking is solidified and immutable, how can one progress and rise.

In the book "Lifelong Growth: Redefining the Successful Thinking Mode" by Carol Dweck, people are divided into learners and non-learners. The growth mindset of learners will push you forward. Non-learners The hardened thinking will limit your development. We still have to work hard to become the former.

In the process of writing this article and looking at the views of the two parties, I also learned some previously unknown information, and gained a deeper understanding of social phenomena and these issues. I hope to think together with everyone and build a more harmonious and rational society.

2. Regarding the discussion of the 227 incident on different platforms

, many articles have been published on different platforms. On some platforms, people who attacked Xiao Zhan left fierce comments, and even abused the authors of articles supporting Xiao Zhan and readers who posted messages supporting Xiao Zhan, causing him to withdraw from the platform and no longer discuss it. On some platforms, readers are more rational. It is hoped that platform operators can carry out a certain level of management. This is not the so-called "control and comment" and "whitewashing", but should retain rational discussion and debate, control various abusive and personal attacks, and avoid "bad money to drive good money." Currency" effect.

3. Excerpts from the comments of the readers of this article

Thank you for your patience in reading my long article. I am very pleased with the value of my thinking and analysis. Many of the messages are of high quality, and I have learned from them, and some have been absorbed into the article. The ideas are mutually inspiring. "Virtue is not lonely, there must be neighbors."

"From the perspective of economics, we should look at and analyze this incident objectively, and write it very pertinently, praise it! This incident has exposed too many problems and is worth pondering. At the beginning, the media’s irresponsible guidance and public opinion led to the rapid intensification of the situation. To be honest, I think Xiao ZhanThe studio’s apology statement is fine, and I have never understood why Fenghuang.com and several public knows have repeatedly asked him to come out and apologize. Later, the radical remarks and collective online violence of 227 groups, various big-character posters, and various ghost and animal videos on station b were really shocking and ruining the three views. I hope that people of insight can participate in rational discussion and thinking, and jointly promote the reasonable resolution of these problems, and I hope that the only real-name victim in this cyber violence will be treated fairly! "

" The problems exposed in this farce can be said to be shocking. Legal education for teenagers must be strengthened. The media should not just stand there with loud voices on social events, but should provide objective and rational analysis. 's media disqualification this time, regardless of right and wrong, disappointing . "

" The author's analysis is very neutral and professional, and finally got my three views back! I hope that some media articles can fairly guide the three views of minors! "

" "Trained by Fu outside, in the mother's ritual", I have never heard of a person's words and deeds that need the guidance and responsibility of acting stars. "(Thank you, I put this quotation into the text.)

"Why this event will turn into a social event, your article is very clear. 1. Elevating a star to a fan’s spiritual leader and life mentor, exaggerating the positive guiding role of a star to fans Raising fan's extreme behavior to idol disqualification ignores that large samples will generate extreme data and the star's vocation is not to educate fans. 2. From a legal perspective, it explains the rationality of citizens using the right to report when they encounter illegal situations. If you have opinions on the report, public power agencies should be urged to establish more reasonable rights protection measures instead of attacking those who legitimately use their rights. 3. Freedom of creation should be respected, but freedom should also be defined. Thought-provoking articles can have erotic descriptions, but articles full of erotic descriptions are not necessarily thought-provoking. 4. Behind the collective behavior of fans is that commercial interest groups manipulate the fan economy, and fans pay too much attention to idols to breed excessive possessiveness. 5. Behind the behavior of group bullying is the media incitement that pursues popularity while ignoring the antecedents, as well as the indifferent legal awareness and power and responsibility attitudes of extreme freedom seekers who emphasize freedom but do not want to be bound by rules. "

" I only think that since in a country with a legal system, who is right and wrong at must first be judged by law, and then must be balanced in terms of morality. All the speeches of the teams that broke away from this foundation lack fairness. "

" I am studying economics as a freshman, and I have been entangled in this matter for a long time these days, and I cannot always come to a comprehensive view. After reading the teacher’s article, I just want to express my gratitude to you. This article made me interested in my major (originally a willingness to listen to my parents’ reports) and gave me the motivation to learn economics and psychology well, Only by studying more can you achieve independent thinking and not follow the trend , thank you! "

" For me who graduated in economics, it is really great to interpret the relationship between celebrities and fans from an economic perspective! Economic rent, consumer surplus, producer surplus, familiar theories come back to my mind ! From an economic point of view, it is similar to that producers obtain the largest consumer surplus through complete differential pricing. This is really the case when you think about it!"

"I am deeply touched by the concept of'consumer surplus' in the article. I never felt that I was'chasing stars', on the contrary, I was just giving back. Because there are so many things from "Xing", whether it was the reconstruction of a normal life with his help last year, or some of the persistence and ideas that followed, he first gave me. After receiving these, I I thought of returning. This is actually an equivalent exchange in a sense. "

" Today, many people at told me that after reading your article, they suddenly realized , thank you very much for making many fans sober. "

" The author's analysis is very rational and comprehensive. I hold the same point of view as you, but see that the media only pays attention to fandom culture and fandom culture phenomena, and rarely talks about the violence suffered as a living "person". I always feel that the development of the situation has deviated from the original However, a large number of marketing accounts are still accusing innocent people, and I feel very depressed, feeling that the Three Views have been destroyed. Your article gave me hope, thank you! "

" Thank the author for treating people as adults from a human perspective. Poor Xiao Zhan couldn't live his life. He is also the child of his parents, so why should he bear such a disaster. His mother feels so distressed. "

" The troublemakers sit back and relax, those who follow the trend are afraid of not being chaotic, the listeners do not distinguish between right and wrong, the coveters sit back and reap the benefits, and the clarifiersFalling into the abyss, the implicated can't argue with each other, and the victims are flogged. "

" The truth is always clearer and clearer. All positions and expressions of should be based on at least an understanding of facts, and then the logic of law, ethics, economics and sociology should be used to evaluate . We oppose campus bullying and cyber violence. In the final analysis, we are not trying to be honourable, but to return everyone to reason, objectivity, and goodwill. We all live in this melting pot of heaven and earth, and being kind to others is also being kind to ourselves. "

Generally speaking, in addition to some people who are stubborn that their own understanding cannot be changed, some people are also confused but can't figure out the truth. It is still necessary to use theoretical tools to conduct rational analysis to help everyone clarify their understanding. As Marx said, "Once the theory has mastered the masses, it will become a material force. "

I forwarded this article today's headline Dong Ximiao and the Legal Reading Library, click to enter.

Other articles

1. Anti-Internet violence: We can forget and forgive, but we must know the truth.

Internet violence is really shocking! Is it a teenager or a job black? If you don’t believe in God or Buddhism, don’t you believe in human justice, the conscience of the world? For minors, campus bullying in China is at best a critical education, and the United States will enter the juvenile prison and go to jail. In a credit society, once a criminal record is left, going to school, applying for a job, or taking a loan will be accompanied for life. "The United States is the freest country in the world, but it also has the most prisoners in the world. According to statistics from the U.S. Department of Justice and international organizations, the United States holds a quarter of the world’s prison population, while the U.S. population only accounts for 4% of the world’s population. "

consulted the World Prison Population List (12th edition). In 2018, the total number of prisoners in 223 countries and regions was 10.74 million, of which 2.12 million were in prison in the United States, the world’s number one, China’s 1.65 million, and the world’s number one. Second, American prisoners account for 20% of the world, which is indeed high enough!

The freedom of the United States is also the freedom under the protection of the law and the freedom under the law. How can there be freedom without borders!

The behavior of some people in this incident, In the United States and China, does it constitute an illegal crime?

3. The official Weibo of "Ban Yue Tan" issued a Weibo community announcement on April 2 on the ecological governance of celebrity entertainment content. "This special action of the Blue Plan is specifically aimed at celebrities. The contents and accounts of fans, selling celebrities' privacy, malicious posts and insults, etc., were cleaned up in a centralized manner. ""Appeal to the majority of netizens to stay sensible when chasing stars, do not maliciously attack stars and other fans, and actively spread positive energy. "