The South Korean artist Jiang Zhihuan’s sexual assault case has recently revealed a batch of new evidence, which may reverse the first and second instance Jiang Zhihuan’s guilty verdict.
Jiang Zhihuan was drinking alcohol at his home in Gwangju with two female staff of the outsourcing company on July 9 last year. The two women reported to the police that they had been sexually assaulted and indecently assaulted by Jiang Zhihuan. Sentenced to two and a half years in prison, suspended for three years. After the judgment of the first instance, Jiang Zhihuan filed an appeal but was rejected by the court of second instance. After that, Jiang Zhihuan appealed to the Supreme Court again. Today, the media exposed the surveillance video of Jiang Zhihuan’s home on the day of the incident, and the mobile phone chat records of the two informants, saying that these evidences may help Jiang Zhihuan to come back in the Great Court. The
surveillance video shows that Jiang Zhihuan and the two informants were drinking and swimming together at home on the day of the incident. You can also see Jiang Zhihuan drunk until he lost consciousness and was helped by two informants back to the bedroom. Then the two informants wandered around Jiang Zhihuan's home wearing only underwear. The mobile phone chat records of the two informants on the day of the incident were also exposed. From the chat records, it can be seen that at 8:30 p.m. when the police believed that the case occurred, informant B was still chatting with a friend. She was at 9:9. I had a voice call with a friend again, and the other party sent a paragraph of "If it is true, then the headline news" text after talking to her, making people wonder what B said during the call.
Jiang Zhihuan’s legal representative stated in an interview that the two informants did not say that they were sexually assaulted when they first reported the case, but only that they were imprisoned, and later changed their words and said they were sexually assaulted. In addition, the two claimed that Jiang Zhihuan’s mobile phone signal at home was not good, but the chat records of the two can prove that they had been using their mobile phones to communicate with people that day, and the police could not detect them from them. Jiang Zhihuan's DNA, in view of the above, has to make people wonder whether the two informants falsely accused Jiang Zhihuan.
Quan Huimei/Text All rights reserved Mydaily prohibits reprinting
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-