Ayase High School Girls Cement Murder Case (End)

Hello everyone, thank you for your support in the previous article.

Yes, I actually understand that writing out the details of murder and abuse can best meet the curious needs of some readers. But having said that, after these curious plots, if the reader can't bring more thinking, then this description is meaningless.

is different from those unresolved incidents. In this case in Ayase, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, the details and the process of committing the crime have been excavated quite clearly, so even if I repeat these details, I try to reproduce them in writing. The crime process does not help the significance of the incident. So I might as well take the initiative to avoid these cruel facts.

However, when this article was reposted on some other platforms, the comments received in the comments were really irritating...

I think it’s okay. If these people want to read "a girl caught, various He gang raped, and finally stabbed the girl to death. Several people caught and shot them.” There are many articles on Chinese websites like this. Why should you come to me?

So I was chatting with my friends that day, and I felt that my readers were really little angels...

is all right, I won't put high hats on you. My goal today is to finish telling this story and start immediately.

=====================

At 10 am on January 4, 1989, Junko Gutian experienced 41 days of imprisonment and many inhuman abuses. After being beaten by four teenagers for more than three hours, he finally closed his eyes forever.

However, after the violence, the four teenagers thought that Gutian had just passed out in a coma. So they tied Gutian's legs firmly with tape to prevent her from escaping, and several people drove to the sauna to wash. According to a subsequent confession, Miyano had already realized that she had died while beating Gutian.

The teenagers stayed in the sauna for a whole day. When they returned home early the next morning, everyone realized that Gutian had died. But at this time they didn't feel any guilt, and no one wanted to call the police at all—and we don't know if the family members of Cou went upstairs to check on Gutian Shunzi during this time. If Minato’s parents and elder brothers were not able to help Gutian Junko under the supervision of the teenagers, then in the process from near death to death of Gutian Junko, Minato’s family actually bears an unshirkable responsibility. of.

But it was the second floor of such a well-educated family. Poor Gutian Junzi was devastated and tortured for 41 days. When she was dying, she was still looking forward to returning home and escape from this terrible hell on earth. However, the people around her, no matter how "normal" they seem to be in daily life, their approach in this matter is very intriguing.

Yes, I know some readers think of "Stockholm Syndrome". Then let's talk about Stockholm Syndrome along the way.

========= Stockholm syndrome ========

Stockholm syndrome manifests itself in hostage taking, kidnapping, illegal imprisonment, etc., between the victim and the perpetrator for a long time When alone, the victim's sympathy or even appreciation for the perpetrator is a psychological phenomenon. For example, in the "Mitsubishi Bank Hostage Incident" in Osaka, Japan in 1979, when the bank security saw the police trying to sneak into the bank from the back door to rescue the hostages, the reaction was not to cooperate with the police, but to shout to the bank robbers. "The police are here!" and stop the police from intruding.

And in another more terrifying "Fukushima Exorcism Murder", the victims who were originally "exorcized" have gradually been living with the perpetrator Eto Sachiko. This female murderer's "exorcism theory" generated trust, which eventually led to the tragedy of 6 deaths. Yes, you guessed it, Eto Sachiko is the protagonist of the "Female Murderer" we will write about next time.

As opposed to Stockholm syndrome, there is another thing called Lima syndrome. One is the capital of Sweden and the other is the capital of Peru. In the case of

Lima syndrome, the victim and the perpetrator have been alone for a long time, and the perpetrator sympathizes with the victim, helps the victim, and cannot bear to hurt the victim. This is Lima syndrome. This phenomenon appeared in 1996In the case of the hijacking of the Japanese ambassador’s residence in Peru in 1997: Peruvian anti-government guerrillas invaded the Japanese ambassador’s residence and hijacked all Japanese staff including the Japanese ambassador. But during the 4-month occupation, these guerrillas began to learn Japanese, read books about Japan, and even became good friends with Japanese staff. On April 22, 1997, when the Peruvian army forcibly broke into the Japanese ambassador’s residence, the guerrillas in charge of taking care of the hostages should have shot the Japanese immediately. However, they were unable to do so, and even gave up taking the hostages, instead rushing out and fighting with them. In a battle to the death, the government forces were all killed by the government forces. 71 of the 72 hostages were successfully rescued. Only one hostage and one government army died because of their injuries.

Another more famous example of Lima Syndrome, you can see in "Dog Day Afternoon" starring Al Pacino and John Cazale (the brother of the godfather), how the two bank robbers changed Become a hero who makes the crowd cheer on the street.

However, in the case of Junko Furuta, it is difficult for us to see such a moment of "human glory". The reason is that whether it is Stockholm syndrome or Lima syndrome, the factors that occur must meet the following characteristics:

1. The perpetrator's coercion and harm to the victim must have other demands: bank robbery, political asylum , Demanding the release of political prisoners, etc., rather than committing crimes against the victim;

2. The victim needs to truly feel that his safety is threatened;

3. There needs to be some friendly behavior between the victim and the perpetrator;

4. Hostage Completely isolated from the outside.

However, it is a pity that, except for the second and fourth, none of the four above are satisfied. So don’t use "Stockholm Syndrome" to try to explain this. The term Stockholm Syndrome is not a panacea.

As for the role of the family, it was actually very "embarrassing" in the case of Junko Gutian: They were neither the original perpetrators nor the intention to participate in the case, but in the end they became the criminal collaborators who helped the abuser. They are neither willing to help Gutian Junzi to escape successfully-otherwise his home will become the target of the police; nor are they willing to let Gutian Junzi really die at home-so that his family will not be able to escape. In such a dilemma, the Cou family chose to escape like an ostrich.

The bad boys headed by Miyano actually don’t know how to deal with Junko Furuta: At first, maybe they just wanted to vent animal desires, but after the sexual assault, too many people were involved in this crime, and Their "base" was also exposed, so the teenagers felt that they were potentially threatened, and vented the violence to Junko Gutian. In such continuous collective crimes, every individual is actually worried that others will betray themselves, so more and more people are instigated to participate in the crime, and at the same time, they unconsciously and unconsciously procrastinate indefinitely against Gutian. Straight disposal. This resulted in 41 days in prison and the death of Junko Gutian.

For Junko Gutian, the 41-day imprisonment for atrocities is actually tantamount to a hellish experience. From the initial belief that "I can let myself go home after satisfying these people", it has changed to "Whatever you can do as long as you let me go home", the transition to "Maybe they will let me go home when they are bored", until finally despair , Fell into a coma and died unfortunately. Her inner suffering during the whole process is unimaginable for us, but also unbearable to imagine.

========================

In the early morning of January 5, 1989, teenagers who didn’t know what to do with Gutian’s corpse, used blankets and travel bags She wrapped her corpse hastily, put it in the trunk of the car, and drove the car to a clearing near the factory. They brought the empty gasoline tanks from the factory, and threw Gutian Junzi's body into the tank with his travel bag, and poured cement. One detail of

is that Junko Gutian had been chasing a TV series called "Dragonfly" during his lifetime, starring Nagabuchi. But on November 25, 1988, when she was kidnapped, the TV series happened to air the last episode. She missed the last episode and often mentioned it during her imprisonment. inIt was in the travel bag that contained her body, and Miyano deliberately put the videotape of the last episode of the show. According to Miyano himself, "I was afraid that Gutian would become evil spirits and curse him." It's really speechless.

At 8 o'clock in the morning that day, the teenagers who originally planned to throw the gasoline drum containing cement and Gutian corpses into the sea drove the car to the seaside construction site in Jiangdong District, but they were afraid of revealing their license plate number and suspicious whereabouts. , He discarded the petrol drum in the corner of the construction site, and drove the car away. It should be said that if they really threw this gasoline can into the sea, then I am afraid that this matter will end unconsciously, and the whereabouts of Junko Gutian will probably always be a mystery.

After the affair was over, the teenagers thoroughly cleaned the trunk of the car, and returned to the second floor of the Cou’s house, packed all the items that Junko Gutian had been imprisoned in the car, and drove to the beach and burned them all. . It can be said that at this time in the Gutian Shunzi case, most of the visible evidence was completely destroyed.

==============East window incident ==============

18 days after Junko Furuta was killed, on January 23, 1989, Ayase Police in Adachi District The department found Miyano and Shinsaku and took them back to the police station for questioning. At first, the two people thought that the body of Junko Gutian was found, but from the voice of the police, they learned that they were because they gang-raped a 19-year-old companion girl in a hotel in December 1988. The victim reported the matter.

thought that this incident was nothing remarkable, so they admitted the gang rape, but always emphasized that "the other party is voluntary." So the police applied for a search warrant against the two people's homes and began to search their personal belongings.

On March 29, 1989, two prosecutors came to the Juvenile Detention Center in Nerima District, Tokyo and asked to meet Miyano and Shinsaku separately. In front of Miyano, the prosecutor took out a pair of women's underwear found in his house. So the prosecutor lied to him in a half-virtual and half-real way, saying:

"Are you killing someone?" The speaker of

was unintentional, but the listener intended it. After hearing these words, Miyano saw this specious "evidence" presented by the prosecutors, and his psychological defenses collapsed completely. He lowered his head and said, "I'm sorry, I killed it." The prosecutors were shocked.

, So step by step, he set out the whole picture of the whole incident of Gutian Shunzi's imprisonment, killing and corpse throwing. A few days later, Shinsaku, Minato Nobuharu, Watanabe, and other six unscrupulous teenagers who participated in the atrocities against Furuda Junko were all arrested by the police.

Miyano confessed the crime so easily, in fact, there is a reason: since he was imprisoned in the guard, he was tortured by auditory and visual hallucinations all night and night, and the guard repeatedly reported that Miyano was alone in the cell at night. Yelling, crying and laughing. Presumably, before the prosecutor arraigned him, his mentality had already collapsed.

On July 31, 1989, the Tokyo District Court held a trial against Miyano, Jinsaku, Minato, and Watanabe. As for the few people who were not prosecuted, it was because the prosecution determined that they were "forced to participate in crimes," and they were exempt from prosecution. The charges against the four were: abduction, indecency, rape, murder, and abandonment of bodies. The defenders of the teenagers argued that the death of Junko Gutian was not a murder, but "death from injury", which was an accident. Miyano even said that "I didn't want to kill her" and "I just thought that if the violence continued like this, she might die" - that is, he defended himself by "manslaughter".

After the first day of court, Miyano passed out in court.

On May 21, 1990, after nearly 10 months of confrontation between the prosecution and the defense in court, the judge announced in court the indictment filed by the prosecution:

"...this case has never happened in our country’s history. This is a major and extremely heinous crime, the defendant’s motives for committing the crime and killing have no room for consideration. For the victim, she has suffered abuse that cannot be considered by common sense..." The media present at

said that they had never seen the wording. Such a fierce indictment.

On July 19, 1990, nearly a year after the case was tried, the Tokyo District Court issued a verdict on the case:

Miyano Hiroshi, guilty of causing death and abandoning the body. The prosecution’s proposal for life imprisonment was rejected, and the sentence was changed to 17 years in prison;

was convicted of death by injuring and abandoning the body. Rejected the prosecution's proposalThe proposed sentence of 13 years imprisonment was changed to 5-10 years indefinite imprisonment;

Minato Shinji was convicted of intentional injury and abandoning the body. The prosecution’s proposal for imprisonment of 5-10 years of irregular imprisonment was rejected and the sentence was changed to 4-6 years of imprisonment;

Watanabe Koshi, found guilty of intentional injury and abandoning the body. The prosecution’s proposal of imprisonment for 5-10 years of irregular imprisonment was rejected and the sentence was changed to 3-4 years.

As soon as the verdict was issued, the prosecution immediately appealed on the grounds that the sentence was too light. One year later, on July 12, 1991, the Tokyo High Court revised the original sentence:

Miyano Hiroshi, changed from 17 years imprisonment to 20 years imprisonment;

made a concession to maintain the original sentence, 5- 10 years of irregular imprisonment;

Minato Shinji, changed from 4-6 years of irregular imprisonment to 5-9 years of irregular imprisonment;

Watanabe Koshi, changed from 3-4 years of irregular imprisonment to 5-7 years of irregular imprisonment;

The Tokyo High Court also stated its own opinions on this judgment: "Because the perpetrators in this case were all minors, a lighter sentence was imposed in accordance with the law. Although this sentence seems to be too lenient compared with the penalties for adult crimes, However, for the purpose of saving and educating young people, this court believes that this judgment is appropriate."

=========================== ======

Yes, if I am not wrong, you will definitely ask: Why not sentence to death? The reason for

is this: In the 1990s, Japan was extremely cautious about juvenile death sentences - in fact, not only juvenile crimes, but even adult intentional homicide cases, the use of the death penalty was extremely cautious. Guan Guangyan, who was sentenced to death in the "Ichikawa Family Murder Case" we mentioned earlier, also caused an uproar at the time.

The logic of the court is that in this case, a number of teenagers caused the death of a victim during the atrocities, so the defense of "harm to death" was supported instead of the "murder" proposed by the prosecutor. In comparison, Guan Guangyan, who killed the family of Ichikawa, killed 4 members of the victim's family alone. Judging from the number of victims, it is indeed the case of Junko Gutian that prevailed, but if we consider the pain and inner despair of the victim before his death, I think Junko Gutian is actually even more painful: because she was Abuse for 41 days.

If you are interested, I will introduce to you the "death sentence standards" for juvenile delinquents in Japan. This is a very dialectical argument that was initiated in the 1969 "Nagayama Norio serial shooting case." The verdict in this case has in fact established the death penalty standard in Japan from the 1970s to the present.

Of course, these are all things. In this case, Miyano, who received the longest verdict, was actually released around 2010 and returned to our world incognito. So, how did they walk in later life?

(There is no next time decomposition here, please rest assured.)

===========Ending===========

1. Family members of Junko Gutian. After the verdict was issued, the parents of the four bad juvenile defendants all offered to go to the grave of Junko Gutian to apologize, but all of them were rejected by Junzi Gutian's family. The location of Shunzi Gutian’s tombstone has not yet been announced. Her family didn't want anyone to disturb the poor girl who had fallen asleep.

Miyano’s mother sold her house and passed the proceeds of 50 million yen to Junko Furuta’s family through the lawyers’ team. The father of

God created a compensation account through the lawyer team and deposited a large part of his daily work income into this account as compensation to the family of Junko Gutian.

These are all voluntary compensations proposed by the perpetrator's parents.

2. Miyano Hiroshi

was released on parole in 2007, and then changed his name to Yokoyama Hiroshi, moved to southern Tochigi Prefecture alone, and then had short-term part-time jobs in Ibaraki and Osaka.

was officially released after serving his sentence in 2009.

In January 2013, he was arrested by the Tokyo Metropolitan Ikebukuro Police Department as a "suspicious fraud" for spreading false information such as the "Pachinko Gambling Winning Law" on the Internet, because he was only a member of the organization.Released after being charged. Currently living in Tama City in the west of Tokyo and making a living playing underground boxing (black boxing). Until now, still single. After the

incident, Miyano's parents both resigned.

3. God made

in 1999, he was released from prison for juvenile delinquents. Then I met a Chinese woman who worked in Tokyo and got married. Since

was constantly being searched for after his release, he was determined to develop in China. So began to learn Chinese.

In 2002, I joined a software company, but resigned because of disagreements with my colleagues and boss.

In 2003, his Chinese wife divorced him because of domestic violence.

In June 2004, he came to a family in Saitama. There lived Maruyama Katsuo and Ogi Yuzo, two of them were company colleagues, and the house was a shared dormitory provided by the company. After

opened the door, he punched and kicked Maruyama Katsuo, shouting "Dare to steal my woman" - at that time Maruyama Katsuo and Godsakujo were dating a bar girl. After that, Shen Zuo took out the metal bat from the car and said to Maruyama: "Do you know who I am? I am the god in the cement murder. If you are not obedient, I will use this to kill you!"

Yuanshan had to get into his van with Shenzuo, and then Shenzuo took him to the lounge owned by his mother, where he beat Yuanshan for several hours in a single room. That night, Da Mu received a text message from Yuanshan's phone, asking him to pick him up. After receiving Yuanshan, the two immediately called the police.

After the police came, the gods still had a very arrogant attitude:

"Even if I was taken away, the police would still be deceived by me."

"As long as I have a mental illness, how can I catch me? Go in, how can you release me."

"When I come out, you two will wait to die."

The police asked God to arrest him. During the trial, Yuanshan suddenly disappeared from the world. According to Oki, who lives in a dormitory, "Maruyama has always been very afraid of God’s revenge, and then he fell into constant anxiety. From mid-August, never again. I haven't seen Maruyama."

God acted very well-behaved aggrieved in the court about this matter: "I didn't say to kill him."

In March 2005, Shen Zuo was sentenced to 4 years in prison with 7 years of probation.

has now been released again and his whereabouts are unknown.

4. Minato Shinji

was released after serving his sentence in 1997. He immediately married a Romanian woman.

started participating in regional competitions as a Muay Thai fighter in 1998, but every time he played, the audience was full of boos. Retired soon.

In 2003, the family moved to Osaka and then to Aizu City in Fukushima, but their whereabouts were unknown.

Minato Shinji's parents both voluntarily resigned from the hospital after the incident, and the two were expelled from the Japanese Communist Party.

The Communist Party of Japan issued an announcement stating that the two crimes had nothing to do with the Communist Party.

5. Watanabe Kyoshi

was released after serving his sentence in 1995. In the juvenile prison, he was bullied by other juvenile offenders in the same institution, and he became phobic to the crowd ever since.

has become a claustrophobic youth since he was released from his sentence and stays home. Currently living with my sister and brother-in-law in Itabashi Ward, Tokyo. Unemployed, single.

6. Although Shinichi Ihara

participated in the gang rape of Junko Furuda, he was not charged. Nevertheless, under the in-depth exploration of various media, the facts of his involvement in the crime were announced.

married in 1999 and currently has two daughters. Occupation is a construction company employee. Because

is often discussed by neighbors and isolated by the community, the family often needs to move. Daughters are also targets of campus bullying at school.

7. Ai Iijima?

Many online rumors talk about Ai Iijima "participated in the abuse of Junko Furuta". The source of the rumors is that Miyano once admitted that he was in a relationship with a female artist when he was imprisoned and tortured against Gutian Junko. As an AV actress, Ai Iijima, who was also born in Tokyo, immediately became the subject of suspicion in the "online investigation".

However, this speculation actually came from a "best friend" and "colleague" of Ai Iijima who was drunk and used it to attract tabloid reporters. Its credibility can be imagined. Since Ai Iijima himself died of pneumonia in 2008, it is difficult to confirm this claim. I tend to think that this is a malicious rumor.

8. Young people affected by the case of Junko Furuta

Because of the direct impact of "no one will be sentenced to death", the rate of juvenile crime in Japan has shown an upward trend after the verdict in Junko Furuta's case: From 8.9 people per 100,000 in 1992, it rose to 125,000 per 100,000 in 1998. It can be said that the sentencing of this incident was too light and the failure of education reform has in fact led to a generation of young Japanese contempt for the rule of law.

Especially between 1997 and 2003, not only did the juvenile crime rate remain high, there was even a group of "angry 17-year-olds": the age of many juvenile criminals hovered around the age of 17. In just one year of 2000, there were 7 cases of crimes committed by a 17-year-old boy:

May: The murder of a housewife in Toyokawa City, whose name was not disclosed, was 17 years old.

May: West Rail Bus hijacking and murder, his name is undisclosed, 17 years old.

May: Murder at the Toyo Bowling Center, Shibata Daisuke, 17 years old.

June: Okayama metal bat murdered his mother, his name is undisclosed, 17 years old.

July: Yamaguchi murdered his mother, Yukio Yamaguchi, 17 years old. For the details of the case, see: The Osaka Sisters' Killing Incident

August: The Oita Family's Killing Incident, Keiji Inoue, 15 years old.

September: Kabukicho videotape store explosion, name is undisclosed, 17 years old.

have the opportunity to talk about this very thought-provoking phenomenon in detail.

=======================

write here today. Let’s stop here for the cement murder of Ayase Girls’ High School. Thank you for your appreciation.