160 million word-of-mouth on the first day? The ten billion actor Deng Chao's sincerity and the box office of "Galaxy"

took out the box office of the screen, and the box office on the first day after "Galaxy Tutorial" was officially released: 63.3 million. Plus the box office for screening: 160 million.

So far, Deng Chao’s cumulative box office has officially exceeded 10 billion, making him the 9th 10 billion filmmaker in the Chinese film market, and the 4th Chinese 10 billion filmmaker after Wu Jing, Shen Teng, and Huang Bo.

But I don't know if he is in the mood to celebrate now. Before the summer vacation, this movie between him and Yu Baimei was regarded as the dark horse of the summer vacation. After

withdrew from the archives of "Eight Hundred", "Young You", "Little Wishes" and "Hidden in the Blade", leaving a huge box office blank for the summer files, this film has the same tears as "I am not a medicine god" Movies with elements and social issues are regarded as the last barrier for the summer archives of domestic films.

Many people have already regarded it as the natural choice for the summer box office champion, so they copied the large number of advanced screening tactics of "I am not the god of medicine" to release the film's word-of-mouth effect as soon as possible, and create popular movies for the whole people, which becomes film marketing Reasonable choice.

But now the situation has taken a turn for the worse. After the official start of the painting, the Douban score of the film dropped from 6.5 at the beginning to 6.3, especially when it was met with bad reviews from professional film critics.

Under the influence of less than expected word-of-mouth, the film’s box office upward momentum was immediately interrupted, as if a highly anticipated player fell on the starting line as soon as he started running.

Now the industry has begun to explore: whether this summer box office champion, which was originally considered almost a certainty, has just lost the box office iron throne.

You must know that the box office of "Sweeping Drugs 2" next door has reached nearly 1.1 billion.

An embarrassing fact: because there are not many domestic seeded players left in the summer file, it is no longer possible for Hong Kong films to win the summer file championship, and this is almost unimaginable in the summer file of the past two years. .

For Deng Chao himself, this should have been a complete courage work between him and Yu Baimei. After the two comedies that were acceptable at the box office but were not successful in word-of-mouth, the news that came out of the previous click was: this time The movie, something different. But now everything is blurred again.

But why is "Galaxy Tutorial" not selling right after it started? How did the ten billion filmmaker Deng Chao's movie ambitions become a box office?

Deng has worked hard, but can't make a good movie?

Compared with Deng Chao and Yu Baimei's previous works, "Galaxy Tutorial" is almost completely reborn. One of the most obvious feelings of

is that the movie is no longer messing around, and the setting is deliberate. The focus of the

film is no longer a spoof, but a story of a father-son relationship spanning 30 years.

In the beginning, his father used to be a bridge design engineer. As a result, on the day of the torch relay of the Beijing Asian Games-

, the bridge designed by him collapsed in public.

​​He was imprisoned for his unit, and his wife divorced him.

When he saw his son again after being released from prison 7 years later, it was at the meeting where the dean of education announced that Ma Fei had been expelled from school.

Everyone feels that there is no hope for his son.

At this time, his father stood up and made a bet with the dean: Ma Fei will be admitted to the top ten at the end of the semester, and will become the best child in the school when he graduates.

's propositions about fatherly love and education are rarely mentioned in previous Chinese commercial films. With the setting of "Wandering Earth", the guest appearance of "Space Wolf" has increased the appeal of the content of space rescue.

No matter how you look at it, Deng Chao and Yu Baimei have a big win this time.

is a movie with too much win, and one thing is often indispensable: design.

This may be largely derived from the creative psychology of Deng Chao and Yu Baimei this time: I can't bear it anymore, I must turn over.

and how full the emotions are, and holding back the energy to make the audience cry, even if it is not the original intention of the main creation, at least it is a subconscious. The result of

is that there are too many complicated things in a father-son relationship.

is about education, growth, and family. It's about the times, about ideals, and about fathers. After the film

was officially released, some viewers suspected that their tears had been calculated under the collective questioning of film critics.

Looking back, many tear-gas plots are unnecessary, at least, it is not very logical.Yes, for example: Father goes to sell blood to buy computers for his children. The problem with

is that even though my father was blinded when he first came out of prison, with his own knowledge, he could earn 800 yuan from the contractor in ten minutes.

My son wants to buy a 586 computer, which is quite expensive. Let’s not say that my father is doing everything possible to satisfy the reason and unreasonable, because later he didn’t find out that his son did anything big with the computer.

is like a mountain, but he is selling blood and moving bricks on the construction site, and he wants to sell watches when he has nothing to do. How much money can he make? That was the era when real estate took off. He is a top architectural design genius, making money, is it so difficult?

is just easy to make money to buy a computer for his son, is it sensational to shoot? Not sensational. Then sell blood. The

villain setting is also extremely unreasonable. In "In the Name of the People", Li Jianyi, who played Inspector Ji Changming, played the role of the teaching director. Although Ma Fei's performance has improved a lot, he insisted on giving children five lectures, four beautiful and three love essays, so bad to the end of the universe. Is it really necessary? There is a scene in the

movie. Ma Haowen looks at the white flying debris and asks the teaching director of the world: "Do your students really love to learn?"

But is this question necessary?

How can so many students in the world love to learn? The dean doesn’t care whether students love learning, he only cares about grades.

But in order to create dramatic tension, I worked hard.

In order to be sensational, the father and son must meet a group of gangsters inexplicably. In order to highlight the greatness of the father, the children must be allowed to run and the father stayed and beaten. What is incomprehensible is, why don't father and son run together?

​​plot sensationalism is not enough, the golden sentence should also be sensational.

For example, "What I care about is not whether you got the top ten, but whether your mind is spinning or sleeping!"

and "You can do everything on this earth if you keep thinking about it."

The dialogue is inflammable in vain, it is indeed very flammable. But with similar dialogues repeatedly, it is difficult to escape the suspicion of being beaten up.

From the plot to the golden sentence, under the deliberate operation of the director, the sensational points are piled up, but the tear-point design that is too hard will inevitably make the story distorted.

In order to complete the dramatic reversal of the story, Deng Chao and Yu Baimei directly gave the reversal plot that all the audience thought was the most unreasonable: before, it was from the bottom to the fifth. They went out to travel and watched an aerospace exhibition for half a month. The final exam was admitted to the top ten in one fell swoop.

Apart from saying that Ma Fei is a child prodigy, the audience could not find any other reasonable explanation, but if he is a child prodigy, what is the meaning of father?

But for Deng Chao and Yu Baimei's creations, this is a reversal that must be completed. Reasonable reversal and unreasonable hard reversal must be reverted, because this is the climax of the story.

is under the huge creative ambition, and the ending part has completed another incomprehensible reversal.

The son of an astronaut, because of the “space war wolf”'s incisiveness in the newspaper, asked his father to sacrifice his life for his own reputation and future to clear his long-cherished wish.

I think here is another reflection of Yu Baimei: whether the education of focusing on independent thinking will definitely cultivate a perfect personality.

is not saying that this setting is not good, but if you want to be ruthless, you will be ruthless. If your son is so ruthless, then you should give a tragic ending, right?

but at the end it was forcibly completed.

The son escaped from space and returned to Earth, and said sorry to his father. The grievances of his father were wiped out. How is this the end of mixed flavors?

In the final analysis, in this turn-over battle between Deng Chao and Yu Baimei, the creation of the two people is too hard and too full.

must continue to create conflicts, must be extremely sensational, conventional methods are not enough, just go to pop songs, if not enough, go to long narrations.

To reverse the story, Ma Fei was asked to remove the safety rope from his body in space, spin and jump in space, close his eyes and repair the spacecraft, and return to the space capsule within one minute without any damage. The biggest problem with

"Galactic Cram School" is that it chose a most realistic theme, but the way to solve the problem is full of surrealism. The end result of

's excessive efforts can only be: too much is too late.

"Galaxy", whose reputation has collapsed, can still win the summer box office championship? mayIt's a bit difficult:

don't need to doubt, Deng Chao and Yu Baimei's goal is to recreate a popular movie like "I'm Not the God of Medicine".

has the same thing in that both have achieved good box office results through screening. The difference between

is that the former won a high reputation with zero negative reviews in the click-to-play, which prompted it to advance all the way, and finally won 3.1 billion box office last year's dark horse myth.

Although the latter is superior to the former at the box office, it has suffered a serious two-level differentiation of word-of-mouth. The early operation is fierce, see Douban 6.3.

In the case of a bad reputation, can "Galaxy" win the summer championship?

must first understand why the box office of "I am not a medicine god" can explode.

At the moment, crying films are far more emotionally resonant than laugh films, especially for realistic themes like "I am not a medicine god". To make the audience cry, the audience must first be convinced of this story.

This is also the best part of "I'm Not the God of Medicine". Even in the most sensational passage of the film, the words of the old lady are completely logical, and they are not blunt, deliberate, or piled up.

And "Galactic Crambling School" is just guilty of the rigidity, deliberateness and stacking of the theme first.

Deng Chao’s father is a scapegoat for his unit, abandoned by his wife, inexplicably beaten by gangsters, hit by a car, and lost even his son in a flood. This setting is simply a magical blockbuster, it’s hard to believe it all. it is true.

Another key to the success of "I'm Not the God of Medicine" is to hit reality. Although the answer given may not be correct, it can be justified.

The problem with "Galaxy" is that the film repeatedly asks the question of the gains and losses of education, asking "what kind of education is truly successful?"

If "Galaxy Tutorial" is not trying to deny exam-oriented education, what is the film doing? Well? If you want to deny exam-oriented education, what are the alternatives?

but they are not capable of answering this core question. Since there is no answer,

can only use a forcibly thrilling and reunion ending to force the end of the movie. Therefore, under the premise that the logic of the story and the logic of the characters are not hard-core enough, even with Deng Chao’s infectious performance, Unable to face the doubts of some audiences, and once the audience's doubts become a tide, it will be difficult for the filmmakers to adapt the direction of public opinion.

Once you lose the word-of-mouth resonance and empathy with the audience, is it still realistic to copy the box office myth of "I am not a medicine god"?

The ambition and box office of Deng Chao, a tens of billions filmmaker

I think the root of Deng Chao’s box office’s embarrassing journey this time comes from: "Where is the target you want to shoot after you pull the bow to the full."

is in the Chinese market, For a realistic-themed drama movie to successfully mobilize the interest of Chinese audiences, the key to success is, of course, whether it can achieve empathy.

Can you say that Deng Chao doesn't work hard? In order to promote the film, he even took Sun Li and his child's family on the red carpet, waiting to be jealous and he played someone else's father. Online and offline publicity can be described as a dedicated effort.

He is not only hardworking, but he also competes with himself as always.

, as the former team leader of a tired male logging team, he began to find his own way of transformation. After bidding farewell to crazy comedy, Deng Chao has also tried a number of "literary opera" roles in the past two years, shifting the focus from continuous funny to shaping and plumping the image of a flesh and blood character. From "Scorching Sun" to "Shadow", audiences can see the results of this transformation.

And "Galaxy Tutorial" was supposed to be a complete turnaround in Deng Chao's self-setting. After the reputation has rebounded, I will cooperate with Yu Baimei again, which is to climb up wherever he fell.

shouldn't deny that "Galaxy Tutorial" is a work of conscience, but a work of conscience can only prove intentions, not a good work. The problem with the

movie is not that the problem is too difficult to talk about, but that the ambition of the creator is too big. Because

has a strong desire to express and deep personal feelings, and mixed with huge desire to turn over and commercial calculations, the final result is that the movie has a kind of strenuous feeling of pulling one's hair away from the ground desperately.

It is undeniable that Ma Haowen’s idea in the film is correct. What is the purpose of education and the way of education needs to be considered. Just as Deng Chao and Yu Baimei have no problem with the direction of their efforts.

Deng Chao’s most popular movies so far are comedies, such as "Mermaid" 3.386 billion and "Riding the Wind and Waves" 1.046 billion. His box office and word of mouth are not directly proportional.

The poor reputation of "Passing Through Your World" is 813 million, "The Breakup Master" is 665 million, and "The Villain Angel" is 648 million.

's best-known "Scorching Sun" could not make it into the top ten of his personal box office.

But he has always been an actor who is ambitious and accustomed to competing with himself. This is the moving part of "Galaxy Tutorial". The reality it represents not only belongs to the protagonist in the movie, but also belongs to Deng Chao and Yu Baimei. It represents a more down-to-earth creation that returns to reality.

Unfortunately, Deng Chao may have forgotten. When he was in his twenties, he said, "I don't understand, why is crying more noble than laughing?" After the laughter comedy could not bring the sense of honor that Deng Chao wanted to the filmmaker, he turned and looked for it. Tears from the audience. As the main creator of the film, Deng Chao put this question in front of the audience-what is the target of the film? The audience’s tears, box office, and word of mouth are still a good movie itself.

We have always known that Deng Chao is a very hard-working filmmaker, but this kind of excessive effort, this kind of excessive eagerness to prove his psychology, will instead make him unable to make better movies? The most pressing question for

is: Can "Ten Billion Movie King" Deng Chao still win the summer box office championship?

As of 12:00 on July 19, at noon the second day after the film was officially released, the box office of the film was only 172 million. The most realistic question now may be: Can the film box office break through 1 billion?

We know that Deng Chao is like the line in the film: Never stop thinking, never admit defeat.

Then the only suggestion I can give is: Deng Chao, relax.