, in fact, has been running through Nolan’s attitude and way of thinking, the distortion of time and space, black holes, wormholes, red singularities, multi-dimensional spaces, etc., these theories really exist, although some are not true. Theoretical data is the most supportive, but this is how people’s imagination can be seen. Nolan’s works can’t just look at one of his works. In fact, they can be integrated, such as the realization of multi-layered dreams in Inception In fact, it exists in reality. It is only expressed in an exaggerated way. If it is too exaggerated, it will not be believed. Therefore, it can be released. However, the imagination and penetration of some directors, and the soundtrack given at fixed times, are correct for the problem. His views and future imagination will be integrated into each of his films.
"Interstellar" is a completely anthropocentric space opera: when the earth cannot carry human development, human beings develop endlessly into space to solve the problems faced by development itself. This is the paradox in the proposition that movies with this theme cannot avoid. The "love" in the film finally saved mankind, and the mysterious civilization in the high-dimensional space was also confirmed by the protagonist as human beings themselves-evolved human beings. This kind of expression, I think it is the director and screenwriter's attempt to arouse the audience's cheap touch and blind pride. In the hypercube, Cooper's lines are full of human arrogance and arrogance, which is in stark contrast with the awe of the vast universe that he once revealed at the beginning of the movie. No effort was spared in the design of the bridge section. It can be said that it was carefully deduced, and all the ins and outs seemed complicated, but they were in order.
Murphy and Tom have to be "antagonistic" because of the need of the plot, because after the cornfield is burned to lead Tom out, Murphy can "attentively" discover the phenomenon of gravity in the room, if the two brothers and sisters start If the relationship is very good, then the next segment will be dimmed, and there will be no dramatic scene of burning corn, and there will be no sense of urgency and suspense that Murphy is racing against in the room, so the whole story will be lacking. There is a kind of suspense, so that there is no artistic rendering effect.
Finally, Cooper came back. The 30-year-old Cooper got together with his daughter. Because of jet lag, her daughter is over a hundred years old. Seeing her daughter who is full of children and grandchildren lying in bed is dying, the kind of sadness makes me worry when I watch . Anne Hathaway thought that mankind was finished, and she was cultivating embryos alone on another planet. This movie is really worrying and moving.
Furthermore, seeing the scene of Anne Hathaway in the back of the film made me understand a lot about Dr. Mann, the sadness of being alone and hopeless on a strange planet. Anne Hathaway can also cultivate embryos, and Dr. Mann can only dormant endlessly until the end of life. It is not to blame Dr. Mann for not choosing his hands, but unable to choose. He was afraid that Cooper would know that the planet they were on was impossible. For the survival of mankind, Cooper will return the spacecraft to the earth, so that he cannot go to another planet to explore, mankind will be finished, and he will be finished. When Dr. Mann came to space, he might also be ambitious and hopeful. When he was desperate again and again, he would definitely seize the chance when he encountered a little opportunity. The mess that went to him, only the true face of despair would be revealed. This is also the most powerful part of the film, not only contains love and salvation, even the portrayal of human nature is so vivid!
In the climax of the film, Nolan still uses his iconic parallel and cross-editing multi-line narrative, supplemented by fragmented shots, echoing the first half of the film, with subtleties. But Nolan's personal style is slowly changing. From "Interstellar" we can see that he has been seeking change and self-breakthrough. He proved to us that he is not a director who only made one movie in his life like Woody Allen. I feel that there are two things that make the movie the most brilliant. One is the robot TARS, which has the feeling of the combination of C3PO and R2D2 in Star Wars, and the other is the tsunami scene when entering the first planet registered in the wormhole. , Very awesome, TARS is simply too powerful after transforming. After
finally fell into the five-dimensional space, TARS's sentence "Our mission is not to change history" can also open up multiple plot questions. As for how mankind will be saved in the end, my feeling is that Anne Hathaway escaped from the black hole and landed on the last planet. At the end, she should have just landed. Taking off the helmet and things like greenhouse vegetables not far away indicate that this is OK. Live in. Daughter borrows the number from the black holeAccording to the unification of general relativity and quantum field theory, the problem of Anne Hathaway's return was solved, and finally all human beings moved to that planet. The space station
should be just a springboard in the process of human relocation. The reason why the earth cannot live is because of "fusarium wilt." This virus consumes nitrogen and infects plants. Every few years this virus mutates to infect more plants. When the hero left, only corn was left uninfected. But NASA's laboratory reports that corn will not last long, and everyone can only run away. The dust explosion is a side effect of the death of plants. It is not a big threat. The film explains that humans have moved underground. The main problem is that there is no food without plants.
finally escaped with Plan A, but the professor of Plan A only completed half of it. The robot found the other half. The protagonist told his daughter the other half by flipping the second hand of the clock, thus completing Plan A. In fact, I liked the first part of the whole movie very much, although some places used extremely crude methods to disgust the audience, because Nolan was never a person who demanded details. What he liked was only showing off the details he wanted to show off.
However, we can see that the director may be making a very transformative attempt on the individual (of course the latter part also reflects some), we found that Nolan did not continue to adopt it, perhaps from Quentin Taranti With the complex narrative skills that Nuo learned there, we found that if you are willing to spend the time, you can write the entire coherent story without much effort, without labeling ABCDE and spelling it out—just like we did before. Trying to get out of some forms of showing off skills, and to outline the world with a more kind and concise attitude is one of the successes of this film.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-