Recently, it has been reported that the new movie "The Monkey King" (Dare to ask where is the way) will start filming. I wonder what people think about this? Although I disagree with some of Liu Xiaolingtong's remarks and behaviors, his acting skills are good as an actor. So far the best film and television drama version of Wukong, still has to be boiled down to the 86 version of Journey to the West. So acting as a motion capture should be basically reliable. The only problem is that I don’t know if people are older, and if they do those actions, they can’t guarantee their energy. But the title of this movie, I don't think the six-eared macaque is suitable for a separate movie.
Although the ideological core of "sweeping out two hearts" in this story is sufficiently connotative, there is a problem in independent films: the villain of the six-eared macaque, in fact, lacks a memorable personality and sufficient sense of existence. Recall the impressive demon kings in Journey to the West, all of them have unique styles and personality and magical moves: such as the luxurious five treasures of the gold and silver boy, the thousand-eyed centipede described the weird thousand eyes and surrounding Wukong The golden light array of the scorpion, the poisonous horse of the scorpion, and the white cow form of the bull devil are full of sense of existence, and it is not repeated with others, and readers are easy to have an impression at a glance.
But the six-eared macaque, to put it bluntly, is Wukong 2.0. There are not many personality descriptions and psychological activities. Many lines are even the same as Wukong. The only thing that can talk about personality is that the nature is more violent. So changing his story, and as an independent film without any preparation, I always feel that it is hanging and it is not easy to play. And watching the recruitment of actors, the chaos of the tree spirits and giant spirits in Muxian'an, I don't know how to deal with it. In short, look forward to it reasonably, and hope that the quality of the film can alleviate these concerns. When the movie comes out, I guess I will go to see it.
After taking Teacher Six to play with the stem for so long, the flowering stem is finally over. It would be embarrassing not to go to the cinema to support it. After all, Teacher Six didn't do anything illegal and disciplined. It was nothing more than being stubborn and unpleasant. In addition, he wanted to maintain the two-faced style of the Westward Journey culture by accepting the endorsements randomly. Look at the current film and television market again. It's smoky, and all ghosts and monsters dare to act. The acting is embarrassing and stiff. In contrast, comparing Teacher Liu to those people is an insult to Teacher Liu. Although this may be a bad movie, it's better to be bad on Teacher Six than bad on the flow of young students.
But there is always only one classic thing, only once. The classic can only be reproduced and cannot be deliberately portrayed. Even if the film "True and False Monkey King" is filmed well, it will always be portrayed in the audience's mind. The Monkey King, before the filming of the movie, he began to carry out some commercial publicity, which felt that he was using the audience's respect for the old artist to generate income. The 86th edition of Journey to the West has become an insurmountable classic in the hearts of the public. Even if the original team is invited to come, it is impossible to deduce the demeanor of the year. It can only be said to be a sheep’s head and selling dog meat, so let’s not talk about it for the time being. Is the movie good? Everyone hears that this movie is played by Liu Xiaolingtong, and everyone will respect him and the spirit of his 86 version of Journey to the West.
Even if the show is bad, it will support the box office, because what is portrayed in our hearts is the Monkey King who played by teacher Lingtong. I really don't like to play other people's banners, and other people's classic works should be regarded as a mode of making money. This will only make the audience disgust, rather than like it. Why is the 86 version classic? Because at that time, the big square TV set, because it took six years to complete the filming, and because the actors were very real, it was said to be a classic. This version has been portrayed in the hearts of the audience, and now it is performing, there is no such classic, no realness, only fancy special effects. However, Teacher Lingtong is willing to re-interpret and bring back memories to the audience. We only need to respect. The classics cannot be deliberately carved. Only the enduring works are the authority. Personal opinion, don't spray if you don't like it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-