Some people say that watching movies is a "texture". I have watched a lot of movies and become less and less sensitive to famous directors and celebrities. On the contrary, they are more concerned about whether the movie tells stories and whether it can resonate. Claim.
's evaluation of a film is often very "sensual" , even if a certain lens angle is not good, a certain actor performs a play, this film may become a bad film in the eyes of the audience, let alone those professional film reviews People are unanimously optimistic about literary and artistic movies that have a particularly bleak box office.
is a person who doesn't pick a movie very much. As long as the subject matter, director, starring, topic, and popularity account for the same, he has to look at him in a hurry. However, it is difficult for some films to overcome the urge to "fast forward", even in theaters that cannot fast forward. 's return is not in the eyes of most audiences. The fundamental reason is that they don't take the audience seriously.
I thought about it for a while. It's been a long time since I watched a domestic low-cost movie. The last small-cost movie was called "The Last Sunrise" by netizens as the prequel to "Wandering Earth". Some works of are known to be hot copycats when they look at their names, and they are pornographic films when they look at the posters. Apart from wasting the audience's time and ticket money, I really don't know how to correctly describe why they exist.
wants to quickly gain the attention of the film and television circles as a newcomer. The foreign approach is to shoot soft science fiction, experimental movies, and stylized short films, but in China, this road does not work.
To be fair, due to the limitations of cost, vision, control, acting skills, etc., it is difficult for low-cost movies to be a blockbuster. It is also difficult for new directors and young actors to rely solely on their works to be able to be in the entertainment industry. One of the reasons for getting ahead.
Therefore, under the limited cost, everyone swarmed around hot spots, took shortcuts, and played sideballs. It was difficult to confuse the majority of the audience when shooting things. In the end, the vast majority of low-cost movies were either "theatrical lines". "One-day trip" failed products, either rely on seductive posters and provocative story outlines on the video site to cheat more views.
The impetuous environment affects the mentality of film and television people. This impetuousness is passed on to the audience through the whole process of film and television production. But for the audience, whether the film is good or not, you will know when you watch it. No matter how good and perfect the hype is, it is difficult to trigger a positive "word-of-mouth effect" and fall into the quagmire of low-cost bad films. Can't get out again.
feels that the more newcomers in the film and television industry, the more low-cost movies, the more they should strive for excellence, emphasize stylization and self-expression, and gain a good reputation by relying on good works. The films "Nezha's Demon Boy", "The Unknown Man", and "I'm Not the God of Medicine" prove that as long as your vision is high enough, your ability is good, and your desire to express is strong enough, you can still be in a mixed domestic hospital. Unimaginable success in the line.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-