"Avengers 4" Iron Man snapped his fingers and died with Thanos, but why did Camora not disappear?

In recent years, film technology has developed very rapidly. Novel film shooting methods and various strange post-processing technologies are also emerging, such as CG technology. This technology is used in film shooting more and more widely, sometimes The pictures they produce can even be fake and real, so that the audience can't distinguish between the real and the fake.

Please enter the picture description. CG movie refers to the film itself is shot in real scenes and performed by real people, but interspersed with a lot of virtual and special effects shots. In this kind of movie, although the characters have prototypes, there are actually many scenes and The characters are virtualized through computers. In the previous film shooting, most of the use of this technology was due to the limitation of the scene or the characters, but nowadays, there has been a film that specifically uses CG technology to shoot.

For example, the "Lion King" released this year, although it is based on animation, the plot is not much different from the classic animation, but what is attractive is that the film is made entirely CG, because of the successful application of this technology, almost Every animal is formed by synthesis in the later stage, and there is no sense of violation at all. Under careful observation, we can even clearly see the hair on each animal, and these animals are lifelike. When Xiao Xia was watching this movie, she felt like she was watching "Animal World".

In addition to "The Lion King", there have been many movies similar to this before. Movies such as "Ready Player One" and "Avatar" have more or less applied CG technology. Now the emergence of these full CG movies makes We see that the development prospects of this technology are very broad. Although the technology of

is constantly improving, we can't help but wonder if the virtual technology of these movies develops more and more rapidly, when they develop to the peak, does it mean that all actors will be unemployed? We must know that in the "Lion King" movie released this year, we did not see any actors, just some animals.

Xiaoxia thinks it is really possible, because in this era, many science and technology are developing rapidly, and many people are worried that machines will eventually replace humans, thereby reducing jobs. As an actor with a higher income, the cost of shooting many movies has increased. For example, in "Avengers 4: Endgame" released this year, Iron Man played Robert Downey Jr. paid as much as 1 Millions of dollars can not help but surprise people. Therefore, if CG technology can eventually replace some high-paid actors, then the cost of film production will drop a lot. Even when the application cost of CG technology is no longer high, all actors may face the risk of unemployment.

On the other hand, it seems impossible for Xiaoxia to be completely unemployed for all actors, because even if the film is to use CG technology, it cannot be separated from human performance. As mentioned above, CG technology itself is a real scene. It was filmed in China, and it was based on real people, and this technology is destined to be inseparable from many actors.

At the same time, even if the filming leaves the actors, the audience will not only want to see some animals synthesized with CG technology? What's more, the actual shooting of these animal performances is done by people.

In short, people cannot be replaced in the filming process. Even if CG technology can eventually replace some actors, it will not put all actors at risk of unemployment. The character dubbing of the movie needs people, and the capture of special effects also needs people to complete. People play a key role in the filming process. In addition to this, Xiaoxia believes that rather than saying that the development of film virtual technology threatens the work of actors, it is better to say that these technologies also spur the development of actors themselves. Because if the actors themselves can strengthen their self-cultivation and form a unique movie style that is irreplaceable, then even if CG technology is applied to them, it will also add luster to them. In film history, actors such as Jim Carrey, Stallone, and Schwarzenegger have become the souls of many movies. If the director wants to replace these actors with CG, regardless of whether they will agree or not, Xiaoxia believes that the audience will not agree. of!

Therefore, Xiaoxia still believes that even if the film virtual technology develops to its peak, the actors cannot be completely unemployed! What do you judges think? Please leave a comment below!